The second link he gave has it all. Steam monkey's new store.
Ok I've looked at them, thank you. Should I get the 400 or 500 mesh or does it matter?
The second link he gave has it all. Steam monkey's new store.
Ok I've looked at them, thank you. Should I get the 400 or 500 mesh or does it matter?
400 Mesh works pretty well with higher PG juices, I have had some wicking issues with higher VG juices. 500 wicks better IMO, and is worth the extra $$.
aj, how could 500 wick better than 400 with vg?
odd. they say use 325 for vg (but then again zen says use 325 for vg). btw, i'm running your peice of 500. nice![]()
This thread has grown so much and has gotten away from its original topic of what wicks best (capillary action) I have seen all kinds of setups but science is science. And denser, no center hole wicks better. I no longer use any wick less than 75mm and most are in the 100mm range.
From the beginning:
If you want juice to flow going down by gravity, a loose wick with with a big hole flows the best but that is not true wicking. That is gravitational flow.
Wicking (capillary action) defined as a fluid rising against gravity is best with a tight dense 400 ss wick with a very small center hole.
I am now using # 500 ss on all my lines and it is twice as efficient at wicking as #400.
In a simple lab test I put 3 inch same dia wicks in 2 inches of VG and 3 more in 2 inches of PG and 3 in 2 inches of kerosine. This new test I used 325, 400, 500 SS mesh. The kerosine only rose 1/16 in on the 325 and not measurable with PG or VG. I put a little dab of cotton on the top tip of each wick to see when it got wet. With kerosine the cotton got wet almost immediately on both 400 and 500, pg took 2 min to wet the cotton on 400 and and less than a minute on the 500, the VG took about 30 seconds longer on each. Using small jars with a hole in the metal cap for the wick I made mini kerosine burners. Even with prewetting the 325 it would not maintain a flame. The flame on the 500 was twice the size of the flame on the 400 and consumed the kerosine in half the time. All were 45mm rolled by 3 inches long, rolled tight on a thin paperclip. All rolled mesh to 2.5 mm dia,
In an earlier lab experiment I did a three #400 wicks 35mm, 45mm, 55mm, rolled to 2.5 mm dia and on the kerosine lamp test each progressively maintained a larger flame.
From my simple tests I concluded.
More density in the wicks provided more wicking and therefore more juice to the coil
comparing oranges to oranges
PG will rise higher in a 400 mesh than on a 325 mesh.
Vg will rise higher in a 400 mesh than on a 325 mesh.
On the same 400 wick PG will rise higher than VG because of cohesion forces, but it will not rise higher on 325 than on 400,
And now all rise higher and faster on 500 mesh, and now even better with 635
What would be a good size hole that would be in between what the lavagen has compared to a ZAP? I want to enlarge my hole but I do not want to go as big as the Zap. The smallest drill bit I have is the same size as the Zap. I don't have my bits with me as of this writing but I think it is a 1/16th.
The way it is atm is just a tad bit restrictive for me.
Thanks for the input. I will go out and check this week.
I have another question. After messing with the Lavagen, I decided to try out the Lavatank since I have never owned one before. Is there a good sized O-ring that anyone knows of to put inside the top cap where the carto meets the cap? Not sure if it is suppose to do this but when using a carto in it last night, I am getting some juice coming up through the tip when I vape. I never get this on a normal tank and figured it was because there is not an air tight seal where the carto meets the top of the inside of the Lava Tip. Is it designed this way? I am guessing I am getting some small amounts of juice coming through the cap section and it condensates to the mouth hole.