You brought back a 4 month old argument that was pretty much resolved, where the OP admitted to being intoxicated and agitated.
You brought back a 5+ page thread where you only replied to the FIRST post in the thread. Everything you said had already been said. Many times.
I understand that yes, you're free to post wherever you want, but maybe you should use a little restraint when you feel like replying to such an old thread. If you're having problems deciphering the opinions on items promoted and the way others are not recommended around here my advice to you is that you should remember that this is a forum of unique individuals. What works for party A may not work for party B. Party A might think Boge 2.0 cartos are crap while party B, C, and D will live and swear by them.
I see that you're sort of new to this, so my final piece of advice is that nothing is going to work for everyone. There is no "THIS IS THE BEST" in this industry and that all you can really do is try what tickles your fancy.
I wish you the best in your vaping journey.
It caught my interest - no other reason or restraint needed.
This is a false characterization. My disagreement isn't the expression of opinions, but the displacement of useful information with rants and false information (such as real costs).
This is a false characterization. I never claimed 1 brand will work for everyone. I claim the opposite - that useful and truthful information is needed to help the user.
This is a true characterization. I favor the forum use to relay factual information of benefit to the user over rants, false information, and promotion of 1 product over another when the needs of the users vary greatly.
