What do lightbulbs, audio amps and atomizers have in common? Their output is typically indicated by the manufacturer in watts, even though watts give no indication of the brightness of a light bulb, the loudness of an amplifier or the heat of an atomizer. They should be measured in lumens, sound pressure level (spl) and degrees (C or F), respectively. The technically savvy understand that the efficiency of the device under test, the translation between watts/lumens/spl, etc (linear or logarithmic, etc.), dictate the actual performance of the device. For instance, a 100w audio amplifier is certainly not twice as loud as a 50w amp, because spl is not linear. A 75w lightbulb may be brighter than a 100w bulb if it is more efficiently designed, etc.
Therefore, does anyone have any data to indicate whether 3.5v going into an atomizer is significantly different from 4.5v going into the same atomizer with regard to heat? This would require a controlled test with a thermocouple mounted on the coil and all other variables controlled to be identical. I'm interested in learning about the measurable differences in performance, as opposed to perception from using (which is not to discount perception, I am just curious to see if anyone has perfomed this test).
I will certainly look into it myself, once I'm working in a lab again (laid off last week).
Therefore, does anyone have any data to indicate whether 3.5v going into an atomizer is significantly different from 4.5v going into the same atomizer with regard to heat? This would require a controlled test with a thermocouple mounted on the coil and all other variables controlled to be identical. I'm interested in learning about the measurable differences in performance, as opposed to perception from using (which is not to discount perception, I am just curious to see if anyone has perfomed this test).
I will certainly look into it myself, once I'm working in a lab again (laid off last week).