Do you have a ball park figure on the retail cost?
Very nice design btw...
not yet no - i will update that info once we are a bit closer to having an actual idea.
Do you have a ball park figure on the retail cost?
Very nice design btw...
Looks good Mik!! Once again I applaude Janty for innovating!!
I like it. But the two turn offs for me are the 801 atty/cart (you know I can't seem to get this damn system to work!), would rather a 510 or do like Pure Smoker - make two models to select from. Also wonder why you can't make a reomovable off-the-shelf batt like the JS. You could still have the housing and the usb electronics in the housing.
Just my .02.
BTW - I just took delivery on my JS. Are you guys coming out with an updated model!!?? Hate to think I missed a major upgrade by a few weeks. You guys are getting like Apple!!
yeah but at 6V it makes more vapor, doesn't it (i've never tried a 5V, so im no expert)
But I hope you have a strategy for dealing with folks who are overcritical, never satisfied, persistently negative and can argue days about the most trivial things, and this sort of thing can seriously consume bandwidth when designing a product or taking it to market.
mik, do you know when the baby j will be ready to be sold?
october? november?
I agree completely.
It's kinda sad when Janty unveils a design targeted to a certain demographic, only to have people who don't really belong to that demographic (and probably wouldn't purchase the product anyway) tear it down verbally. I really hope Janty sticks to their guns and doesn't cave in to a bunch of folks on a forum who aren't really interested in that particular model, and just want to complain about how it's not what they would want.
I mean, shouldn't it be okay for Janty to come out with a few different models that appeal to different groups of people? If that particular model isn't something I'm interested in, I'm not going to whine and complain about it. I'll wait for the next product to come out that may be more my style. For example, it looks like Janty has at least three models in development right now, the Cameo, the Baby J, and the new improved Stick. If you don't like the Cameo, does it make sense to complain about it when the new Stick is the model you may be more interested in? Isn't that like walking into a Hyundai dealership and complaining that the Accent doesn't have the features you heard about on one of Ford's concept cars?
Oh well. Rant over.
So - yes, very exciting i think, but what do you think?
/Mik
I hate to bring this up again, but this should not be the attitude of a major e-cig industry player(Hiding their product to avoid customs detection). To insinuate something like this really diminishes your credibilty as a legitimate business. We're sinking back into what drug cartels do to hide something "illegal". Again, this should not be our industry outlook. I'm sure the ECA would have major problems with a statement like this. If you truly want to have an item that has no issues, then incorporate a true dual function battery(as most other mods do) into the design. As we agreed yesterday , this may not be the appropriate thread, so this will be my final word, but it distresses me to see this theme continuing to pop-up.
No, I didn't. And I'm not talking about the folks who gave constructive feedback. I'm talking about the ones who were basically just here to be negative.Hey AngusATAT, did you forget that Janty asked us a question?
Yes, but it was more like positive, negative, and ranting. Not constructive.He did and we responded, positive and negative.
It didn't have to be all positive.If all was positive how can they learn to make improvements?
I'm sure they wanted constructive feedback, not ranting and complaining that this particular model in no way was what they considered to be the perfect PV.If they don't want to know, they would not ask the question.
You may want to take another look. Mik didn't say they weren't going to scrap the idea. He said they would consider making a version of it without an mp3 player.I think by them asking us, they saved them self a lot of money by not putting this MP3 player/e-cig on the market.
Mik:
... Sorry, but even if this might come as a shock to you, im not interested in making a "metal type device". I find them ugly...
>
Wow.
Well, if you can't find the beauty in a perfectly-turned down piece of stainless, chrome or aluminum like the Super T, the AdapteveR, the Vapre51, the Silver Bullet, the Pure Smoker mods or any one a dozen mods cranked out by Cisco we don't have much to talk about. If you want to compare yet another piece of plastic from Janty as compared to the magnificent powder coating of the Chucks and instead extol the virtue of thermoplastic then I'm afraid you and the braintrust @Janty have not listened to your customer base.
We wanted an improved JS. The solid feel and luxurious look of metal would have been a step in the right direction. Many of us LOVE the feel/size and stealthiness of the JS. We just wanted something a bit more substantial. There was no need to re-invent the wheel. The wheel only needed to be trued. K.I.S.S. should have been the M.O.
I respect your opinion and understand your purpose here in the forum, Mik. I just whole-heartedly disagree with you. From the looks of the "Would you buy a Cameo" poll, I'm not alone.
Here ya go, Mik. A whole new niche. Custom made e-cigs. Anyone who is so into 'their own needs, and anything else is crap' mindsets... Have a custom design division. Here you go, one all metal, ___, ___, and ___ (fill in your own blanks) $1000. 00 and free shipping. Six weeks from order, to fulfillment, to your door. I like it!
Here ya go, Mik. A whole new niche. Custom made e-cigs. Anyone who is so into 'their own needs, and anything else is crap' mindsets... Have a custom design division. Here you go, one all metal, ___, ___, and ___ (fill in your own blanks) $1000. 00 and free shipping. Six weeks from order, to fulfillment, to your door. I like it!