I'm not aware of any NETs that also contain WTA.
I'm not aware of any NETs that also contain WTA.

I do understand where everyone is coming from. It irritates me to no end when a vendor claims "NET" and they're actually using TA (and there's more than a few of them). They aren't lying necessarily (again IMO), just misrepresenting.
This is why the distinction must be made. Yes, for all practical purposes TA/TE is an NET, but on its own, it is a mere ingredient that allows for it to be discussed "on-topic" in this thread, but discussed with an asterisk. For the most part, TA/TE will almost always (at least from a noticeable standpoint) exist in the realm of hybrid.
Part of the reason that I think it's really not an issue (as to whether it should or should not be discussed) is that the discussion, reviews, analyses, critique, and most banter--all integral and essential parts to a forum of eliquid--will never, save for VCV (the one exception), be able to be talked about beyond, "it's ashy," "it's dirty," "it's oily," "it's tastes like perfume," "it's dry." Try to write more than a few lines on straight TA/TE (no, not you, Bill or VaporMizer! LOL).
As an aside, TA is used in small percentages of many commercially made cigarettes--maybe to mask all the other mess added? Maybe because most cigarette manufacturer's products need the help?? I dunno. But, it can be considered an ingredient used for the purposes of consumption, but as an enhancer, not the starting point. If a juice's only claim to being an NET is its TA/TE (not VCV), it will be a hybrid at best. No need to add more sub-categories.
Last edited: