There are many expletives springing to mind, but shortsighted midweeks seems appropriate.
Mice don't feckin smoke because they enjoy it!!! Nicotine gets all the blame so that Big P can sell
ineffective solutions, then when they don't work they can blame Nicotine, "It's not your fault, it's Nicotine you see, it's so addictive. Don't worry, just buy some more crap".
Try asking a mouse about throat- hit or whether they enjoy a smoke after a meal or with a pint
and see what they have to say about it. The hardest addiction to beat is picking up something,
sucking on it and feeling that hit which tells us all is well. Do none of these do-gooders realise
that we enjoy the process?
I've done a number of informal blind tests with users not knowing what strength of Nicotine is in
the ecig they were using and a larger than expected number could not tell when they were using zero nicotine. I think it's time I tested that phenomenon more scientifically.
Quote: "We would of course have to weight benefit versus risk, and it would take years of studies to establish such a threshold."
Some people haven't got that long.
So in 5 years time when they have the wonder vaccine and they realise that despite suppressing the body's receptiveness to Nicotine (who shouted frontal lobotomy at the back of the class?!) they find that smokers need something to replicate the sensation of the act of smoking because that is a significant part of the pleasure, then they will look at inventing a gadget to do that. They'll probably call it an 'electronic cigarette' or something equally ridiculous!
JC