Nice! so now we can start painting a bigger picture here.
i found this health & safety bulletin from 3M, it really sheds some light on the subject. http://www.3m.com/market/industrial/ceramics/pdfs/health_safety_bulletin.pdf
"SteamMonkey" talks a bit about the different types of wicks here on this Reddit post.
i found the information to be rather interesting. SteamMonkey claims that 3M does not want the Nextel fiber being used as e-cig wick but cant figure out why. this was posted 10 months ago so maybe 3M changed there mind about it. http://www.reddit.com/r/electronic_cigarette/comments/1epnbj/monkey_university_5202013_wicks_201/
I think 3M adopted a CYA stance on this product for e-cigs due to several people selling it without following the "Heat Cleaning" or "Heat Treating" instructions listed on their Data Sheet in the beginning. The untreated material does have some rather "unpleasant" chemicals associated with the manufacturing process that must be burned off at high temperature for an extended period of time in order to render it "safe". If you browse rba's website you will find a video that shows the difference between "untreated" and "treated" in a cut test. Alot of the early XC-116 that hit the market was untreated and might explain 3M adopting a "not for e-cig policy".