p18650 vent holes

Status
Not open for further replies.

dk2

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 20, 2010
421
12
cheers
search youtube for lipo explosions and you'll get some idea of what Switched is talking about. Even with a large unit like the SB, you're just going to create a rocket / blowtorch in your hand.

If you have a thermal runaway it won't matter if they're laying on a table with nothing around them, it's gonna be bad.

For a couple of dollars more I always buy the best batteries I can get my hands on and, when something better comes along, I switch.

I not only do this with the $10 batteries we use for vaping but also for the $259.00 batteries I use in my helicopters. Expensive, sure. Explosive, not if I can help it.

*An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure*
That's an old saying because it's true.
If it wasn't they'd have quit saying it a loooong time ago..

Yes everyone should buy the best safest batteries that are available.
 
Last edited:

forcedfuel50

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
The 18650 Precise has a fair amount of clearance between the battery and the case. I made it a bit looser as theres a "fair" amount of diameter difference in the 18650 battery brands. I remember reading about a couple of mods that didn't take the 3000 mah red Ultra fires due to being to wide, so i didn't want that to be an issue with the Precise, so i sized it accordingly.

On as side note, yes there are youtube videos for batteries failing, but those batteries were intentionally set up to fail. Has anyone ever heard of batteries failing in a mod using 18650's or stacked CR123a's? The only ones i have ever heard failiing are those damn stacked CR2's.
 

Switched

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 18, 2010
10,144
2,544
Dartmouth, NS Canada
David you can design your mods with all due safety in mind, but at the end of the day can you project with absolute certainty how that mod will be used? No! That is what the discussion is about.

There are still folks burying their head in the sand wrt battery safety. There have been many threads that have demonstrated to folks that we are using batteries outside of their design characteristics and limitations, and some of these have resulted in catastrophic failures. The good thing about these unfortunate incidents, is that manufacturers have re-visited battery safety and are making their batteries safer. To me that is not a bad thing. They are answering the call not unlike you answering the call for an "all mechanical" device.

DealExtreme: $4.15 LC 17335 3V 1000mAh CR123A Battery 2-Pack these are the batts he intends to use in the P18. A simple read of the comments on that page should have lead him elsewhere wrt choice> They are unprotected yet the OP intends to use 'em in stacked application. So why order a protected 18650 for single cell use and order unprotected batts for use in series. Does that makes sense to you? The other way around would have been marginally better, but at least would have increased the margin of safety somewhat.

Ultrafire 18650 3000mA exploded - CandlePowerForums

These are incidents we know about, how many go unreported? The fact that it is occuring should raise concerns and cause sobering reflections. In defense of the gentleman, he didn't know better. BTW those were un-protected 18650s. Could this unfortunate accident have been prevented? IMHO yes.

(snipped from a previous post)

I will answer your last comment first. Yes all batteries are dangerous. The batt was installed in a sealed metal flashlight which = PIPE BOMB

  • He used an unprotected charger
  • He used unprotected batteries
  • He stacked batteries of dissimilar voltages.

<<He charged two cells overnight, then charged the third cell the next day. When all three cells were fully charged he put them in the light and turned it on. It exploded almost immediately.>>

  • Stacked batteries should always remain as pairs
  • Should be marked top and bottom in a set and go into the device in the same fashion always.
  • Should always be charged as pairs
  • Only use PROTECTED batteries when stacking or using in series
  • Only use chargers with overcharging protection.
  • When in doubt, it is safer to toss the battery than experience catastrophic failure
  • Everyone that vapes should possess a multi-meter, especially those who vape HV and stack batteries
  • When in doubt pull out the multi-meter
I purchased a Porsche and intend to have it for a long time. I'm not about to skimp on oil quality to save a few bucks:)

Edit: The only reason I commented on your post Dave is to increase my post count.
 
Last edited:

VaporMadness

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 26, 2010
1,521
7
CA, USA
On as side note, yes there are youtube videos for batteries failing, but those batteries were intentionally set up to fail. Has anyone ever heard of batteries failing in a mod using 18650's or stacked CR123a's? The only ones i have ever heard failiing are those damn stacked CR2's.

Yes, don't have a link handy, but somebody burnt up their leg pretty good when a battery started venting in their MOD in their pocket. Think it was in a Chuck (remember pics of it all fried up), don't remember if this was with a single batt or a stack, protected or not.

[edit] Not sure f this is the incident I'm remembering?
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/thag-built-chuck/75702-my-chuck-blew-up-literally.html

Here's another report, http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/modders-forum/18959-lithium-battery-failure-boom-im-okay.html
 
Last edited:

Switched

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 18, 2010
10,144
2,544
Dartmouth, NS Canada
Yeah, he was using "Evergreen" CR123 batteries. So avoid those at all cost...lol. I've been hammering it before, but again, i truly recommend batteries such as the AW brand. That's not to say they can't runaway vent too, but i'm not aware of any in a mod.
... and rightfully so. Many vendors have or are jumping on that bandwagon as well.
 

Switched

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 18, 2010
10,144
2,544
Dartmouth, NS Canada
OK,

Now that I know what you are asking, I am not fussy about anything that is not protected.

That being said, LIMn (IMRs) are safer chemistry as well as LifePo4. IMRs are overkill in this application. Are you going for 6 or 7V because your link is for 7V applications? What I plan on using are the same batts I am using in my Chameleon:

  • AW 18650 2600 mAh and the IMR 18650 1600 mAh for 3.7 Volt applications
Hope this helps.
 

Drozd

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Nov 7, 2009
4,156
789
50
NW Ohio
Thanks....Going for 7.4 Volts....So in your opinion which ones are the better Batts IMR Stacked or ICR Stacked?

depends on the atty... but at 7.4V your atty to amp draw breaks down like this:
joye 510...................3.22A
standard 3.0Ω carto...2.47A
slb 510....................2.31A
801........................2.11A
901.......................2.00A
4.5Ω HV atty..........1.64A
5.2Ω HV atty..........1.42A

the ICR AW 16340 max drain rate is still 1.5A whether they're stacked or not...

So in my personal opinion I'd stack the IMR....with their 4.4A max drain rate
 

Switched

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 18, 2010
10,144
2,544
Dartmouth, NS Canada
What he said, with a caveat. Not everyone vapes with a stock atty at 7V, they pop rather rapidly. I plan and plan on using 5.2 Ohm attys.

Stressing a protected battery is not as bad depleting an unprotected one. This is indeed new territory.

An HV 4.5 Ohm not XHV 5.2 Ohm atty at 8.4 still only draws 1.9A. Even with a fresh set of batts off the charger the 3.5 Ohm atty draws 2.1A.

I know we can't predict for every possibility. I prefer dble protection over vent holes.
 

KonaNeil

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 29, 2009
808
457
Big Island, Hawaii
Low resistance atomizers are now common as are batteries that will properly yield and sustain the desired current to drive them. With these tools in hand, why are many here still interested in running batteries in series? Am I correct that we would all agree that use of stacked batteries is inherently less safe than use of a single battery? Please understand, I'm not being critical. I truly do want to know.

BTW (though slightly off topic): My AW IMR14500s came in from Hong Kong yesterday. Used with a 2 ohm BE112 in my Super6, this combination makes for as vivid and intense an experience as I need. For those planning to use these batteries with their S6's; get out your screwdrivers. These IMRs are VERY short.
 

Drozd

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Nov 7, 2009
4,156
789
50
NW Ohio
Low resistance atomizers are now common as are batteries that will properly yield and sustain the desired current to drive them. With these tools in hand, why are many here still interested in running batteries in series? Am I correct that we would all agree that use of stacked batteries is inherently less safe than use of a single battery? Please understand, I'm not being critical. I truly do want to know.

BTW (though slightly off topic): My AW IMR14500s came in from Hong Kong yesterday. Used with a 2 ohm BE112 in my Super6, this combination makes for as vivid and intense an experience as I need. For those planning to use these batteries with their S6's; get out your screwdrivers. These IMRs are VERY short.

for me it's because of the different wattages (and heat) that I can get at different voltages...
I see a point and place for both regular and LR atties at 3.7V so likewise there are certain combinations of atty + juice at 6V and 7.4V that I enjoy at times...
 

BrockJ

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 12, 2009
1,394
3
Dallas, Texas
For those planning to use these batteries with their S6's; get out your screwdrivers. These IMRs are VERY short.

Shorter than the regular 14500's or shorter than the protected 14500's?


I use the 16340 IMR's with LR cartomizers and I cannot imagine them at 5, 6 or even 7 volts... They're more than enough for me...

Untill low resistance atties improve their lifespan there's no point in throwing your money away buying them, some LR atties pop within the first five minutes.

There are people getting much better performance out of the LR's than that..
Could it be the brand or where you're getting them from?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread