So, apparently I missed a whole discussion of the petition, well online vape petitions since I didn't see any specific references to this one, on the CASAA members fb group. I wasn't aware there was a CASAA members fb group that is different from the CASAA media page. I had seen Carl Phillips mock petition asking vapers to stop signing vape petitions before. It's a lot of the same "petitions don't influence the decision makers" and "give people a false sense of doing something worthwhile."
It still leaves me with the same questions:
What are we doing to actively fight the deeming regulations?
Supporting HR2058 will help mitigate the results of the deeming, but I don't see it as opposing the deeming itself. I almost see it as "you're right, it's tobacco, but at least give us the same chances you gave all of the other tobacco companies." That is not how I feel, though it would be better than nothing.
Why do people see petitions as just a petition, and not the social media awareness tool that they can be?
Even if someone does nothing else vape activism related and they ONLY sign and share the petition, if someone else that they share it with decides to do more, like join CASAA and respond to a CTA, isn't that a net gain?
How do we reach those non-vapers/non-smokers that might actually support our cause if they knew more?
I don't know, I'm not giving up, I believe the petition can do good and I thank all of you who continue to support it.