"Pixie Dust" regrows severed finger..Awesome!

Status
Not open for further replies.

leaford

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2008
6,863
432
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
I hate to burst your bubble, but the guy didn't regrow a severed finger, just a fingertip. He didn't lose any bone or the nail, just skin and a bit of flesh. And skin and flesh regrow. So there's no miraculous regrowth, just normal healing, so the most we could concllude is that it might promote or spped up normal healing.

Whats more, this is only ONE guys story, and there's been no published research on the pig powder. If this stuff even does so much as help skin regrow faster, why hasn't the researcher, Dr Stephen Badylak, published anything on it? A case study, a lab report, anything? He didn't even write up a case study on the guy who went to the newspaper about it.

Scientifically speaking, this incident is useless. It's not a part of any organized study, and even if it were, there's no point of comparison. Unless the guy had cut off a fingertip before, no one can even say if it healed any faster than it would have without the pig powder. That's why science works by performing experiments, studies, and trials; to establish for certain whether an effect is even occuring.

Dr Ben Goldacre has a nice post about this story: “Pixie Dust helps man grow new finger” – Bad Science
 

LisaLisa

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 4, 2009
3,473
34
I hate to burst your bubble, but the guy didn't regrow a severed finger, just a fingertip. He didn't lose any bone or the nail, just skin and a bit of flesh. And skin and flesh regrow. So there's no miraculous regrowth, just normal healing, so the most we could concllude is that it might promote or spped up normal healing.

Whats more, this is only ONE guys story, and there's been no published research on the pig powder. If this stuff even does so much as help skin regrow faster, why hasn't the researcher, Dr Stephen Badylak, published anything on it? A case study, a lab report, anything? He didn't even write up a case study on the guy who went to the newspaper about it.

Scientifically speaking, this incident is useless. It's not a part of any organized study, and even if it were, there's no point of comparison. Unless the guy had cut off a fingertip before, no one can even say if it healed any faster than it would have without the pig powder. That's why science works by performing experiments, studies, and trials; to establish for certain whether an effect is even occuring.

Dr Ben Goldacre has a nice post about this story: “Pixie Dust helps man grow new finger” – Bad Science

If you watched the video, the guys says that his nail was totally gone. And, it did grow back. So one guy on a blog thinks that it didn't happen, is proof that it's made up? I don't think so.

This was also in last months issue of Discover magazine, which is a very credible magazine that reports on science topics.
 

Houdini

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 12, 2009
2,107
39
64
Las Vegas
I think he was exagerating a bit when he said he lost his whole finger tip. Look closely.
chop1.jpg


Chop2.jpg


That piece of finger would have healed by itself. I'm not saying the pixie dust didn't help it grow (like the title of the video) but I don't think it caused it to grow.
 

leaford

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2008
6,863
432
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
If you watched the video, the guys says that his nail was totally gone.
And we all know that no one ever lies on video, so...

Oh, wait, people DO lie! So, maybe we can't just take someone's words for it, and maybe we should expect some PROOF. And if you looked at the pics, you can see it was just a fingertip.


And, it did grow back. So one guy on a blog thinks that it didn't happen, is proof that it's made up? I don't think so.
But one guy on a video who claims that it did happen is proof that it isn't made up? One guy who was the researcher's BROTHER. His brother. Do you not see a conflict of interest there? A potential motive to exaggerate, or to be overly-impressed with the accomplishment?

You ask for no real evidence beyond one person's word to back up an amazing, extraordinary claim, but want absolute proof from anyone who suggests that what actually occured has an ordinary explanation?

But in any case, I'm not saying that it "didn't happen" I'm saying it was a fingertip, not a finger.

This was also in last months issue of Discover magazine, which is a very credible magazine that reports on science topics.
Last month? Try last YEAR, and just because they're a pop science magazine does not make them either 100% reliable or accurate. Have you watched the Discover channel? ;) They're not a scientific journal, they report on science, they don't conduct research.

And here's what someone else at Discover Magazine had to say about it:
Man?s Finger Heals Normally?No Eye of Newt or Bladder of Frog Required | Discoblog | Discover Magazine

"Spievack’s injury really didn’t look that serious, and fingertips are notorious for growing back, anyways."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread