The 77% was how many of the people who fell ill used THC pods. It doesn’t matter that there are lot more nicotine vapers, if 23% of the victims didn’t use THC pods (and don’t lie about it), but otherwise have exactly the symptoms, you can’t really conclude that THC pods is the cause of all that. There must be an explanation which explains all of the cases, not just 77%.
“Can’t conclude”? Who is concluding? Only you. I’m merely saying that assumptions that the problem is shared even 77-23 is grossly inaccurate.
Here’s the thing: a certain tiny percentage of people just get sick, and scientific instrumentation and practices can only be so accurate. That 23% was taken from a much much larger population than the 77%. You have a tiny population with a larger percentage and a large population with a much smaller percentage.
The problems being seen aren’t just bigger with THC vapes, they’re hugely bigger. So much bigger that it is not impossible for the 23% to be statistical backscatter. They might not be. I don’t know how accurate the testing is, how often these things come up randomly, or if there is another factor to be looked at that produces a better connection than “vaping linked”.
there are a lot of pieces of missing information.
1. How many e-cigarette users are there compared to THC vape users? Also how many vape users reporting these problems compared to non vape users? These are critical numbers. If it was one-to-one the 23% number would be accurate. There are a lot more ecig users than THCvape users though. The question is how many? If the disparate was is large enough that 27% rapidly turns into less than 1%. 1% may still be statistically significant. I just don’t know. I’d like to though.
2. What actual devices and materials were used?
We’ve got some information on that but it is by no means complete. For one all ecig devices are being considered equal here but this is not the case.
3. How actually uniform are the problems? Should separate subclassifications be made? “Lung injury” is vague. Not as vague as “vaping linked” but causality is still possibly being assumed.
Some are apparently suffering lipid pneumonia symptoms, but others appear to have totally different problems.
Yes, they used a term like ‘a lot’ or something similar to describe the vitamin e content of the THC pods. I agree that this is a bit strange, but they seem to say that some people have fallen sick while vaping THC pods with a very little vitamin e.
Enough is the word. “Very little” is as bad as “a lot”