still doesn’t make causality. This is the same issue the Corning breast implant lawsuit managed to end run “I did this thing and this happened” sounds like causality, but it isn’t. How many people who DONT vape THC have these issues? It will be more than zero. There’s all sorts of different things that call BS on a single cause here. Time of onset, clustering, symptoms, all sorts of stuff.While it is possible there are separate problems going on, the evidence to date has found vaping something seems to be the only activity or exposure the cases appear to have in common.
which illness? Part of my suspicion in this is It was maentioned somewhere that the symptoms often aren’t similar with each other. Some are lipid pneumonia, some are things that look like various chemical poisonings, some look like particulate damage.In all cases, other medical causes to explain their illness have been essentially eliminated.
but it happens. Remember “unknown origin” is questionable here. The problem is someone said “vaping!!” How many of these things happen due to things that aren’t vaping? How often?There have been no reports made public of any cases of otherwise healthy young adults falling ill with an acute respiratory illness of this magnitude of unknown origin.
assuming there’s only oneGiven the degree of attention this has received, and the dramatic presentation of the illness,
exactlyI would expect reports to exist if this were not related to some inhalation injury
why? If we picked a different one like blonde haired people or people identified as witches by their neighbors? the victims would be different because The base criteria would be differentiate but would it be just as compelling?related to a vaping product.
I get the impression there is more than 2. People with lipid pneumonia aren’t even a majority. I could be wrong about this. My information is limited and this whole thing is based on the concept that there are different lung symptoms. “Lung problem” is not a single problem.As to the possibility there may be more than one substance as the cause, that cannot be ruled out from what has been made public. But it seems unlikely two separate agents are causing the same types of illnesses described. Maybe if there were two different syndromes being reported then they could be attributable to different agents, but that does not appear to be the case here.
Last edited: