In the last sentence of the 1st paragraph, the "I" in "as far as I know" should be changed to a "we". Don't want to randomly switch into 1st person singular.
"I think it's defined as" should be "we think..." in the "biggest issues" part.
Also, "I assume there is some form of grievance process" should be "We", or the sentence eliminated. (Doesn't provide any input).
I don't know that the summary was really intended for "formal submission to j0ker". It was a summary in this thread. However, I don't have problems including it as long as everyone reviews it thoroughly. I don't want to bias anything with the summary... it was just my way of organizing what I was hearing from the group.
The 1st sentence... change it to:
"The pre-vet thread (PVT) is for people that have not turned but will turn soon."
What about the "joined in 2011" that I saw you guys talking about before? I don't think it applies (I don't remember if we threw a party for anyone that scheduled one that didn't join in 2011 ... like for low post count people) but I'm not sure.
I'm beginning to like the "Operation Yellow Bird" option more and more.... find a way to include everyone. Or maybe we can create a "Post-Vet Thread" (not abbreviated PVT tho!) so that they could party with us too if they already turned. As explained, doesn't affect the contest as the contest people choose to define it.... they can still open it up or not... as they define the contest and don't necessarily tie it to us.
"I think it's defined as" should be "we think..." in the "biggest issues" part.
Also, "I assume there is some form of grievance process" should be "We", or the sentence eliminated. (Doesn't provide any input).
I don't know that the summary was really intended for "formal submission to j0ker". It was a summary in this thread. However, I don't have problems including it as long as everyone reviews it thoroughly. I don't want to bias anything with the summary... it was just my way of organizing what I was hearing from the group.
The 1st sentence... change it to:
"The pre-vet thread (PVT) is for people that have not turned but will turn soon."
What about the "joined in 2011" that I saw you guys talking about before? I don't think it applies (I don't remember if we threw a party for anyone that scheduled one that didn't join in 2011 ... like for low post count people) but I'm not sure.
I'm beginning to like the "Operation Yellow Bird" option more and more.... find a way to include everyone. Or maybe we can create a "Post-Vet Thread" (not abbreviated PVT tho!) so that they could party with us too if they already turned. As explained, doesn't affect the contest as the contest people choose to define it.... they can still open it up or not... as they define the contest and don't necessarily tie it to us.
Last edited: