IMO Grimmgreen has it won.
Derek
ha ha... what?! thank you , but i feel like mine is a little inferior to a few of these other ones , i love mgrimes designs ... and i really like this one..
IMO Grimmgreen has it won.
Derek
We will also have a 2nd and 3rd place ... Just in case, the 1st or 2nd is to intricate to duplicate via lazer etching! I'm not familiar with vector art or raster programs. If you could help explain this to me, I would really appreciate it!
Thanks bud!
you really cant unless the poster clues you into what application they used to create it.
CaSHMeRe, shouldn't you address multiple listings, and more than one entry per user in the final poll? If I'd known I could design an infinite number of variations to increase my chances of winning I would have.
BTW I like most of the designs, but they are usually too busy for a logo or not good for engraving. Gradients, text effects, and multi-colored submissions probably would NOT transfer to the engraver. Grimmgreen's design is a good example, it looks good on a computer, but no engraver can handle the text outlines and gradient, also the letter spacing is off.
It also MUST be vector art. Many are using raster programs.
Also look at all the pro logos out there, they hardly EVER use a symbol, it is usually only the word, like "SONY". One of the most important lessons I've learned in logo design is to keep it simple.
CaSHMeRe - For the poll, I'd only pick designs suitable for engraving. That way peeps who vote don't choose one that WONT work well with an engraver. Like I said, many submissions look great but are not suitable for engraving.
I also noticed many designs do not include the "V" in "V2", but simply went "squared". Mine was like this at first too, but I changed it because the product is actually called "Prodigy V2", not "Prodigy2"
how do I find out which ones are vector and which ones are raster?