Chief,
Thank you for posting these articles. No matter how one feels or thinks concerning this information, it is very good to have access to this information, to be informed one way or the other. Knowledge is power, negative and/or positive. We need to know this stuff no matter the outcome. I've seen stories on the news concerning these findings and automatically write it off.
Again, thank you.
Btw, when I die, I want a body that's all used up.
This one was also useful to me. I will tend not to be such a Richard Cranium in public and at other people's houses. Again, thank you.
And oh yeah, I guess I'll start cracking the window in the Jeep.
I quit reading this when I saw they were quoting Glantz, he is the main person reporting junk science.
KAS
I wasn't going to post it but, that study seems to be the topic of the dayI quit reading this when I saw they were quoting Glantz, he is the main person reporting junk science.
KAS
just in case anyone was wondering what they are talking about.
Bloomberg School of Public Health pretty much sums up my attitude. A portion of that entire article was published in my local paper, a sister publication of USA Today.
Oh, ok. Still, it's good to know so when Jackie's family comes over tomorrow and someone gives me smack about why am still vaping, "hey, haven't you seen the news.... blah blah blah..." I am informed.I quit reading this when I saw they were quoting Glantz, he is the main person reporting junk science.
KAS
Back when there was still a Soviet Union I drank 1/5 of Stolichnaya Vodka. I figured the more you know about the enemy, the better...
Dual users make up a significant proportion of overall vapers, Glantz said.
"E-cigarettes are widely promoted as a smoking cessation aid but for some, they actually make it harder to quit, so most people end up doing both," Glantz said. "This is the dominant use."
Yeah, I'd love to know where those figures came from? Which bodily orifice? Because there was a lot of "he said" in that article, without actual NUMBERS.
I have never heard that e-cigs make it harder to quit, either. Not in my own experience, and most certainly not "out and about". Most of the e-cig users I know are either trying to quit, and in process of doing so, or actually QUIT.
LOL, I think I am starting to hate Glantz. He really is.... special.
Anna
"E-cigarettes are widely promoted as a smoking cessation aid but for some, they actually make it harder to quit, so most people end up doing both," Glantz said. "This is the dominant use."
Yeah, I'd love to know where those figures came from? Which bodily orifice? Because there was a lot of "he said" in that article, without actual NUMBERS.
I have never heard that e-cigs make it harder to quit, either. Not in my own experience, and most certainly not "out and about". Most of the e-cig users I know are either trying to quit, and in process of doing so, or actually QUIT.
LOL, I think I am starting to hate Glantz. He really is.... special.
Anna
I have a new made up word for Glantz to add to fraud, liar and pseudo-scientist. It is "agendavangelist". He has his agenda and he evangelizes about it.
He is the worst kind of quasi-scientist. Along with having no medical education at all (his degrees, including his PhD are in engineering) he's also been named in sexual harassment cases. Only in California could a guy like this get anyone to listen to him.
Don't you love it when an unsubstantiated claim "for some" becomes, in the very same sentence, an unsubstantiated claim "most people". Then to top it all off the claim goes to "dominant use". If I was a jackass, my name would be "Glantz".
One of the greatest, most reliable predictors of future anti-social/violent behavior.
Last edited:
Don't touch the belly.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
