SE, NJoy vs FDA -- Discussion

[Grammie]

Thanks Julie (and all the others that checked the docket for us).

 

[Our House]

Thanks Julie and Sun and everyone else. Will look forward to the TW case now.

 

[jj2]

Thanks Julie................

 

[JerryRM]

Thanks Julie (and all the others that checked the docket for us).

As far as I know, Grammie, SunVaporer, Treece and Julie are/were the people who checked the docket for us.

 

[The Wiz]

As far as I know, Grammie, SunVaporer, Treece and Julie are/were the people who checked the docket for us.

You right Jerry. Treece doesn't post much here but she does alot of good for the vaping community!

Thanks again JJ!
Wiz!

 

[JerryRM]

...and you are thanked, Julie.

 

[Rosco]

...and you are thanked, Julie.

yea...what Jerry said......is what I would say....were I to say it, which I will. TYJ.

 

[JerryRM]

"+1" would have been easier, Rosco.

 

[Rosco]

"+1" would have been easier, Rosco.

yea, but I thought I got credits for each letter in my posts.

 

[Vocalek]

yea, but I thought I got credits for each letter in my posts.

So that's why you're ahead of Jerry by 490?

 

[Rosco]

I know Jerry has thanked Julie more times than I, so I suspect I've been posting in my sleep...again.

 

[thorn]

so............based on the outcome of the case, can Flonase for example (or other 'drugs') be sold -on the shelf- under new names so long as they do not state therapeutic claims (or if they say they are "smoking alternatives")?

 

[Thulium]

so............based on the outcome of the case, can Flonase for example (or other 'drugs') be sold -on the shelf- under new names so long as they do not state therapeutic claims (or if they say they are "smoking alternatives")?

No. Regardless of therapeutic claims, drugs and devices that are clearly intended to affect the structure or function of the body remain under the regulatory purview of the FDA. This ruling is specific to tobacco products. Judge Leon and the Appellate Court agreed with the Supreme Court finding in Brown & Williamson that "traditionally marketed" tobacco products--that is, tobacco products that are marketed for recreational non-therapeutic use--are not subject to regulation under the FDCA because that would effectively ban products that Phillip Morris the government does not want banned.

After this court case began, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act was signed into law giving the FDA special authority to regulate tobacco products, which the FDA now agrees they will apply to electronic cigarettes along with other currently unregulated smokeless tobacco products, premium cigars and pipe tobacco.

 

[JerryRM]

Thanks Julie for a job well done.

 

[kai kane]

TW has voluntarily dismissed (without prejudice so it can refile if necessary).
... And with that, the docket watch is finally done.
:

Ah yes, let's all raise a Toast to Julie and all the rest who have served this momentous occasion!
And a final THANK YOU and MAHALO NUI LOA Julie for keeping us up to date on every move made during this long travail!
(and thanks to Jerry for being our official Instigator!)

 

[Grammie]

Thanks Julie, have a great weekend!

 

[Our House]

Thanks Julie (and others). A long thread-checking journey is over.

 

[Vaporologist]

Puno hvala, Julie!

 

[BCB]

Thanks to Julie, Sun and Treece for watching the case(s) for so long and so faithfully and keeping us informed. Thanks to everyone else for explaining what it all meant. It's been a very interesting journey. Vape on!

 

[Vaporologist]

Oh, and thank you Jerry for always thanking Julie...