Well its still being given a run for its money by big brother that's what I do know.
Well its still being given a run for its money by big brother that's what I do know.
I chain vaped pretty much constantly from the time I first found an ejuice I liked, until I had been vaping 2 or 3 months. I had to start at 6mg I was chain vaping so much, but after the cigs were gone, I had to go up a little to 8mg, then to 9mg, and right before my appendix went kerblooie, I was at 9.5mg. Then I had that month-long smoke-break after the appendectomy, and when I started back to full-time vaping, I went up to 10mg, and have pretty much stayed there ever since; it seems to work, and I don't chainvape so constantly.
It's only too much if it makes you feel sick; 18mg and 12mg did that to me, so I went to the lower nic so I could vape as much as I liked, anytime the thought of a cigarette crossed my mind. After a few months, that incessant need eased.
Andria
The official fda assessment:
E-cigarettes have not been fully studied, so consumers currently dont know:
the potential risks of e-cigarettes when used as intended,
how much nicotine or other potentially harmful chemicals are being inhaled during use, or
whether there are any benefits associated with using these products.
However, they know the effects of cigarette smoking, from years of studies.
Yet they have never banned them.
As long as the tax money, keeps flowing to the government, they never will.
Don't you just love the FDA........always looking out for our health....![]()
How many people know niacin is short for nicotinic acid?
However, they know the effects of cigarette smoking, from years of studies.
Yet they have never banned them.
As long as the tax money, keeps flowing to the government, they never will.
Don't you just love the FDA........always looking out for our health....![]()
what I dont get is tax revenue is generated buy ecigs every owner every ecig industry employ payes taxes. Smokes are sold a stores that carry other stuff as vape shops spring up I would think eventually the jobs and industry created buy ecigs would eventually out do cigarette revenue.
Question is it normal to chain vape when you totally stop with the cigs even if you have been Weening yourself off?
How many people know niacin is short for nicotinic acid?
A better question is how many knew this before learning it on ECF? Me thinks the crickets would be deafening![]()
Has anyone here compiled a list of the LD50 of all the various B vitamins? Seems it would make a powerful defense against the "Nicotine is a deadly poison" argument if even one is close to nicotine's modern corrected LD50.
I cant help but thinking if we keep doubling in numbers each year and in the near future Vapers out number smokers with all of the extra stores exct.... that would follow local and federal would lose little in the long run besides all of the obvious benefitsThe problem is that there is so much money for the governments in cigarette sales, for several reasons.
The feds tax them at about $1 a pack.
States tax them at between $0.45 to $6.50/pack.
Then there's the Master Settlement Agreement, where BT pays the states some amount per pack (don't know the actual numbers, it's complicated). 7 billion last year, though.
Not to mention the carry-throughs. If your state has a lottery, you will notice that a LOT of the folks come in to pick up their daily pack also buy lottery tickets at the same time.
Would they make the trip just for the tickets (as opposed to the cigs, which they NEED to have)? Not all of them!
There's just no way the e-cig businesses, if taxed appropriately, would come anywhere close to that revenue stream. And they know it. So their options are either to kill it, tax it outrageously, or spend less money. (Just kidding about the "spend less money" part).
If we cloned a genetically altered juice we could make it more healthy
Now wait a minute! Your trying to confuse me by mixing up stuff I posted last night in a different thread with this... And it's working!![]()
I cant help but thinking if we keep doubling in numbers each year and in the near future Vapers out number smokers with all of the extra stores exct.... that would follow local and federal would lose little in the long run besides all of the obvious benefits
The problem is that we can't keep doubling, at least not for very long.
I think the latest estimates are that last year, perhaps 25% of smokers were actively vaping.
If so, and if the rate doubles every year, at the end of next year, 100% of smokers will be actively vaping.
Despite that being a good thing, it's a disaster for state governments (and a pretty big hit for the federal government).
There's no way that income tax, business tax, normal sales tax, reduction in unemployment, etc. will make that up, even if every other store on the block is selling vaping gear.
Then it looks like we fight or lose because our goberment needs money and is growing everyday and need more!