For f***'s sake that stupid c-clip!!! I've opened it before for cleaning, but this time it took a hour lol, as I had forgot how to do it with the screwdriver...It finally came off and now I remembered the "way" again... Then another hour to get it on, but still not getting on! Tried with another screwdriver than the one to get it off, and "nailed" it in second try! Love the design, but freakin' hate c-clips... Though a saved set of threads, makes up for it, imho...
Anyway, I had to clean it both because well, it's a mech, but also because I wanted to make some VD tests to see if there's a difference between the one-piece-contact 1:1 switch c-clip smpl, vs 2-piece smpl, vs 2-piece magnet smpl(mine's also with copper pin)... Granted, the 1:1 switch smpl is in copper and the others in SS but nonetheless, as I couldn't get a SS 1:1 on FT/FC... However, as the 1:1 switch of the copper smpl also fits the SS tubes, then I changed switch and tested that also(SS with 1:1 switch). Btw, the 1:1 switch is a clone of the newest smpl switch which only has waves two places and not all around and is much more stable than the 2-piece-contact switches with waves all around, but I haven't yet tried a 1:1 switch with waves all around. Maybe the less waves improves stability? By stability, I mean repeated results, btw...
Anyway, here's the results, and I only did a standard 1ohm test this time, and 5 presses and most consistent selected... It's an old abused 25R used... I have 4 unused 25Rs, and 2 30q's, i'm gonna take into rotation and ditch the others very soon though...
SS, 2-piece contact, spring: 0.19v
$9.92 SMPL Styled 18650 Mechanical Mod - stainless steel + brass at FastTech - Worldwide Free Shipping
SS, 2-piece contact, magnets, copper-pin: 0.15v
focalecig.com - SMPL Style 18650 Mechanical Mod - Silver
Copper, 1-piece contact 1:1: 0.11v (and much, much, stabler button!)
focalecig.com - SMPL Style Mechanical Mod - Copper
SS, 1-piece contact 1:1(blend of the two mods above): 0.12v
Also tested the first smpl with and without spring, and the result where pretty much identical or 0.01v different, depending on which result chosen. Also, the magnet smpl I had to do 10 turns, because it was more unstable than the others...
Wiggling the button paused the display shortly and came back repeatedly, but I couldn't really see anything else much with regards to values changing more than before. I only tested it on one "not 1:1" switch smpl(the one with magnets -- EDIT: Crap, should have tested this on a smpl with springs I guess, since "springs and current" where the topic for this test... Sorry!)... I guess it could make the negative contact slightly turn at an angle to either side against the battery and which would shortly break/change the current and vd drop because of sparks. Also, it would change which side in the middle hole, which connects the two pieces, have contact. The "gap" is so small that I believe there's always contact, atleast 99% of the time...
I remember Froth once stating that his clone smpl's vs originals, where about 0.3v apart, because of less good tolerances on the clones. He uses(atleast used too use) pretty low builds, same resistance-range like me, so that's why the big difference also, and not a 1ohm test like here...
Lastly, VD tests, in general are not of much use, but they are however very useful in correct context, as a personal tool for measuring efficiency between owned mods, for better battery/cycle-life and not having to workaround a bad mod by lowering resistance which drops even more current. Also for not getting hot switches on low ohms as much.
I say 'personal', because the values are not interchangeable, as most of the drop is the internal battery resistance itself and not the mod, but when using same cell, it's perfectly possible to compare between your own mods...
Sorry for long ramblings, lol!
