All we need to do is have the rossum stash bunkers' coordinates [emoji16]That seems like a fairly safe bet, and it would behoove people to get their ducks in line before then.
All we need to do is have the rossum stash bunkers' coordinates [emoji16]That seems like a fairly safe bet, and it would behoove people to get their ducks in line before then.
I go to the doc and complain about a grouchy hip joint, a long standing issue that had only become noticable in recent years. Xray shows a condition. Doc offers pain killers even though I didn't ask for that. I say, hell no. Didn't go back to that doc. (Exercise nearly eliminates the issue.)There's a process occurring in the US regarding liability for the rapid rise in opioid abuse and overdoses. States and municipalities have sued the drug makers over their marketing and misrepresentations regarding their products that resulted in overprescribing of opioids to patients who became dependent on them. The liability was meant to reimburse states and cities for the cost of medical care needed for all those patients that needed treatment. Sounds a little like the MSA, right?
Then it goes further. The pharmacies get added as defendants for filling all those prescriptions. OK, maybe they should have seen a pattern, especially the national chains that had tons of data that could have raised red flags. But they're not done. Then they tack on individual pharmacists working in those stores for filling the prescriptions. So the pharmacists decide to sue the individual doctors for writing the prescriptions. Mind you, no one has identified a particular patient or prescription in this mess, just the whole lot are responsible.
Following that chain of logic, the doctors can then sue the patients for asking for the prescriptions in the first place. If the patient never complained about pain none of this would have happened. Then the patients can sue the drug makers for making the opioids that got them dependent. Which sorta brings us back around to the states, representing their citizens, suing the drug companies to begin with.
I'm not suggesting or certainly defending what the drug makers did when they pushed so heavily that their products could be prescribed with a lower risk of abuse than the old fashioned opioid pills already in use for decades. It was a money grab and they do bear responsibility. Yet if you follow the above line of logic, essentially everyone believes they can blame someone else for the problem, and our legal system allows an endless cycle of lawsuits to be filed and argued, while not a dime is going to any individual actually harmed by those marketing practices. The end result will be billions of dollars paid in settlements, which to the drug companies is just part of the cost of doing business, all of which will end up either in the pockets of all the attorneys or in the general revenues of states which won't use the money for its intended purpose in the first place.
Of course then there's the unintended consequence of people who truly have severe chronic pain losing access to any relief because no one want to manufacture, dispense, or prescribe the drugs because they're afraid they'll get sued all over again. This is the "justice" system we've allowed to develop because no one wants to be responsible for their actions.
All we need to do is have the rossum stash bunkers' coordinates
Um My High School mascot WAS an Aardvark. No I am NOT kidding!We used to get a good laugh comparing what answers we lied about on surveys at school about the curriculum and teachers. Got a petition circulated with 75% student signatures to change our mascot to an aardvark. See a pattern?
The one thing I can say with certainty is we’re all going to die. Prep accordingly.
They better allow vaping wherever we end up or I’ll be ...... for eternity.
Considering there are so few that make any ties whatsoever to the increase in vaping that happened at the same time the decrease in smoking happen I kind of doubt they'll ever admit they're wrong at least not until the ones that are alive and practicing now die or go out of practiceJust now thinking, maybe, with the inevitable lack of available products which will occur from a heavy handed enforcement, there will be an uptick in smoking rates. If honestly documented and analyzed, there could be a backlash from true health advocates down the road asking what the hell went wrong here!?! Maybe then a real discussion could be made for harm reduction policies instead of the prohibitionary course we seem tied to presently...
The claim they've filed for some e-liquids. Have you seen anything that suggests they filed some for nic base as well?Nude Nicotine has disclosed they filed a PMTA. If it is accepted by the FDA then their products should remain for sale for a year beyond May, assuming Congress doesn't interfere.
They have given an opening to write and ask about nic for mixing. That should happen. I wonder, if a particular eliquid is approved it's manufacture could be licensed. Could it be licensed to shops? Sell them an approved all-in-one flavor and let them have the profits from mixing. It might save a lot of shops who depend on mixing.The claim they've filed for some e-liquids. Have you seen anything that suggests they filed some for nic base as well?
Am I recalling correctly the FDA has already said they don't plan on restricting flavorings before they are added to commercial liquid? How would it be different for PG and VG? And if those three are not covered how do they distinguish nicotine? I don't know the answers but the FDA probably does.I sort of don't want the government like thinking too hard about nic for mixing, in case it's not on their radare but let's face it, it probably is. I mean....Anna