My wife has been instructed to bury me with one of my stainless steel or titanium mechs and a liter of nic base.They better allow vaping wherever we end up or I’ll be ...... for eternity.
Last edited:
My wife has been instructed to bury me with one of my stainless steel or titanium mechs and a liter of nic base.They better allow vaping wherever we end up or I’ll be ...... for eternity.
I agree 100%! The only thing worse than lying to others is lying to yourself.An "ex-smoker" who bums cigs is lying to himself.
Please elaborate on this.We are all responsible, we pushed for it, we raised so much ruckus 'they' had no choice but to come up with the MSA.
I've never understood how a government agency can force a manufacturer to lie.I understand what their idiotic reasoning is behind it. I still wonder if there is a way to legally challenge it. Then another question is who would challenge it and where would the money come from. I would be willing to donate for such a challenge. IMHO the FDA has severely overreached here but that's no suprise.
Man. I am an older person. I haven't posted on this forum in ages. But today, I tried four of my usual online shops to replace a bit of hardware and was told nope. We can't ship to you, you is in Arkansas.
Man. I am an older person. I haven't posted on this forum in ages. But today, I tried four of my usual online shops to replace a bit of hardware and was told nope. We can't ship to you, you is in Arkansas.
... It has always been my opinion that lawsuits from anyone who started to smoke after the original Surgeon General's report (1964?) should have been thrown out. "You knew (or should have known) it was dangerous, but you started anyway; now the consequences are all yours to bear."
Exactly. Like labeling my car ‘produce’ because I use it to bring home groceries.I've never understood how a government agency can force a manufacturer to lie.
Nope, zero nic juice does not contain nicotine, and neither does a brand-new "delivery device".
I agree. The societal concept of personal responsibility and its legal equivalent, assumption of risk, are dying concepts.
There's a process occurring in the US regarding liability for the rapid rise in opioid abuse and overdoses. States and municipalities have sued the drug makers over their marketing and misrepresentations regarding their products that resulted in overprescribing of opioids to patients who became dependent on them. The liability was meant to reimburse states and cities for the cost of medical care needed for all those patients that needed treatment. Sounds a little like the MSA, right?
Then it goes further. The pharmacies get added as defendants for filling all those prescriptions. OK, maybe they should have seen a pattern, especially the national chains that had tons of data that could have raised red flags. But they're not done. Then they tack on individual pharmacists working in those stores for filling the prescriptions. So the pharmacists decide to sue the individual doctors for writing the prescriptions. Mind you, no one has identified a particular patient or prescription in this mess, just the whole lot are responsible.
Following that chain of logic, the doctors can then sue the patients for asking for the prescriptions in the first place. If the patient never complained about pain none of this would have happened. Then the patients can sue the drug makers for making the opioids that got them dependent. Which sorta brings us back around to the states, representing their citizens, suing the drug companies to begin with.
I'm not suggesting or certainly defending what the drug makers did when they pushed so heavily that their products could be prescribed with a lower risk of abuse than the old fashioned opioid pills already in use for decades. It was a money grab and they do bear responsibility. Yet if you follow the above line of logic, essentially everyone believes they can blame someone else for the problem, and our legal system allows an endless cycle of lawsuits to be filed and argued, while not a dime is going to any individual actually harmed by those marketing practices. The end result will be billions of dollars paid in settlements, which to the drug companies is just part of the cost of doing business, all of which will end up either in the pockets of all the attorneys or in the general revenues of states which won't use the money for its intended purpose in the first place.
Of course then there's the unintended consequence of people who truly have severe chronic pain losing access to any relief because no one want to manufacture, dispense, or prescribe the drugs because they're afraid they'll get sued all over again. This is the "justice" system we've allowed to develop because no one wants to be responsible for their actions.
There probably is no easy way for the shopping cart scripts to handle denying only liquids to certain areas while still allowing hardware without paying a programmer to set up something customized.Things are in a pretty much chaotic place, with the various States enacting onerous laws. Different vendors do different things to try to not be in violation.
But some are truly bizarre, such as not shipping say hardware to States that have a flavor ban. Uh, just what flavor is pyrex??
In a way I don't blame the vendors. These laws are so vague that it's easier to just not deliver anything than take a chance. As an example I wanted to buy a couple mods and a few RDAs from AREliquids. When I tried to checkout it says they don't deliver to Kalifornia. In the area I live there are no bans all. There are only a couple places in Kalifornia where there are bans. I could have had the stuff sent to my son in Arizona and then to me but it wasn't worth the hassle for me. This whole vaping situation is ridiculous but it's really going to get worse in May.Things are in a pretty much chaotic place, with the various States enacting onerous laws. Different vendors do different things to try to not be in violation.
But some are truly bizarre, such as not shipping say hardware to States that have a flavor ban. Uh, just what flavor is pyrex??
That seems like a fairly safe bet, and it would behoove people to get their ducks in line before then.This whole vaping situation is ridiculous but it's really going to get worse in May.
I've not only got my ducks in a row, but I also have a few geese, a turkey, and a couple of chickens.That seems like a fairly safe bet, and it would behoove people to get their ducks in line before then.
But oh all those fun toys to play withI've not only got my ducks in a row, but I also have a few geese, a turkey, and a couple of chickens.
EDIT: Oh, and an enormous credit card bill.