Actually you can't (sit with a tampon in your The only reason I'm not allowed is ignorance from head office, and fear of litigation... shame really.
If they are so afraid of litigation then suit them.
It is far, far more than second-hand vapor anyone is concerned about. The whole reality of metal tubes from China, filled with untested liquid, serving nicotine addicts, sold over the Internet to anyone, is fraught with reasons to reject e-smoking. On another thread, there is even concern for e-waste in landfills!
This comes down to two propositions not everyone accepts: Intent and impression.
The intent is to deliver addictive nicotine. Don't argue about using non-nic liquid. That won't fly. The intent of an e-cig is to deliver nicotine. And government has a right to pass judgment on something like that.
The impression is that we are smoking. Other smokers see an e-smoker and think they, too, can light up their favorite Newport or Marlboro. Wrong. So a pub or bar owner says "I don't need the confusion" and bans e-smoking the same as tobacco smoking.
Intent and impression are two major problems for e-smoking. The world is waiting for creative solutions to resolve both.
The argumentation of metallic tubes from china is just not valid at any level, regulation is the important part, if that metallic tube is regulated there is no problem, even if the metallic tube is for serve nicotine addicts or you can take a look at this plastic tube filled with gel nicotine serving nicotine addicts:
Smoke-Break® currently undergoing FDA-allowed clinical studies and with a 71.1% of succcess rates for keep people off analogues.
As for the 0% nic liquid, is something to take in count we like it or not, because everytime more people are getting to the point of use ONLY 0% nic, I don't think the 0% nic will work for everyone but if it works for a percent of e-smokers then is something to take on count.
If Smoke-Break is traying to get a FDA approval for their plastic tube filled with flavored gel nicotine for INGESTION by nicotine addicts, why not JC do just the same? is it the fear to get banned? come on people, we all know that if this things got banned a lot of people will keep using them anyway (just like Australians and Mexicans do), so, what is the BIG deal with trying to get things right? I don't see BIG pharma or BIG tobacco trying to kill Smoke-Break, the e-cigarette's manufacturers haven't taken the next step just because NOBODY is pressing on them to do it, not the authorities, not the consumers, so they can do whatever they want, when someone push on them they gonna do everything on their hands to get regulated and keep their revenue, you can add to the BIG list the e-cigarette's manufacturers, they are not our friends either, they want our money, nothing more, if they were our friends they will be concerned about get regulated just like Smoke-Break is doing.
