Petercro
I use a primer bulb like the kind found on small gasoline engines and I put a tube threw the atty power line to add air flow also. .
I would like to see that bulb in action
Petercro
I use a primer bulb like the kind found on small gasoline engines and I put a tube threw the atty power line to add air flow also. .
Edit: Regardless, you don't want you tube to go past the bottom of the cup because you will hit the heating coil. If you get it to the nickel foam, it is far enough. All you need to do is get the foam wet, and it will hold a few hits worth of juice. That depends on the atty model. The 901 may only hold 3-4 drops(like the 510), but the gynormous 801 will hold up to 15 drops just in the nickel foam. Which is one of the reasons I started out with it when trying to design a 'from the bottom' juice delivery system. (that and it has a big hole)
The only way around this would be to use a non-conductive feed tube (that won't melt) if you can find such an animal. I'll have to ponder that one.
Scottbee (or anyone) do you know if the 901 allows for bottom feeding?
Yes it does. And one side hole vent.
And I believe Teflon has toxic liabilities when heated to extremes - did Dupont receive criticism for using it on pans and Dupont factory workers suffered health issues from exposure? Don't have time right now to Wiki that temp range, so it might still work.
There are high temp silicones available - still waiting for factory samples for a cart mod and atty core insulation test I am running
Yes, Teflon can release toxic fumes when heated to high temperatures. The exact transition temperature is in debate.. but it is generally believed to be above 500 degrees F. WAY, WAY, WAY beyond the temps that you will see at the base of the coil pot.
So, you're thinking of choosing a design where the bottle feeds a cart/carto like the mrpuffer?
The tubing I have is high heat silicone but I was going to use a short piece of brass pipe through the batt connector up into the atty. So the consensus is that I should abandon this idea and just go with the more standard cart feed? Design wise, I'd really like to come up from the bottom but I can re-route stuff to top feed if that's the best way.
Looking for a consensus on invention is a sure way to do it the way it was done before. Let your mind wander.
Looking for a consensus on invention is a sure way to do it the way it was done before. Let your mind wander.
Personally I think the bottom feed is the 'step forward' in the whole juice delivery system. The cart feed systems are going to be easier to do, but I would think the flooding would be a major PITA with that method.
With any kind of pump it's going to take a while to perfect the technique of pumping, and using top feed, every time you flood it, you have to tear it down and blow it out.
With the bottom feed, the pump is going to soak the nickel foam/wicking and then suck all the extra back. Even if the bottle is pressed too hard and you fill the atty half full of juice, it's all going to come back down on the pump release. Seems like, it would almost be impossible to flood with a (sealed) bottom feeder. The key is the 'sealed' part though. If there is an air intake below the atty (like the JB), then the negative pressure of the released bottle is sucking back air instead of juice.
Just my .02
But considering that every atty has air intakes below the bottom, wouldn't that imply that it is a prerequisite for an atty to work? Has anyone tried sealing up the bottom intakes to see otherwise?
All of the air that you inhale comes through those bottom two holes (510). If you block them off, you simply won't get any air or vapor unless you provide some other pathway for the air to enter the atty.
The center bottom hole can also be an air pathway, but it is plugged by most battery configurations.