I smoked while using the gum and patch. So yeah, I found them completely useless. vaping is the ONLY thing that has gotten me completely off cigarettes.
I find this to be very common for vapers. I am not one of those vapers. The only thing that has gotten me completely off of cigs is cold turkey. Three times. Now that "three times" is a little humorous until you realize that I once went cold turkey longer than any vaper alive today has quit smoking via vaping, so currently, for me, cold turkey is the method that I KNOW will completely get me off of smoking longer than any vaper/ex-smoker has quit smoking. I find that matters.
I do find that vaping has consistently reduced my desire / cravings for smoking, and am now a moderate smoker. I like that label a lot. Perhaps some day I will not, and will choose, I think rather easily, to stop smoking and continue to only vape. Or I may choose to go cold turkey altogether from nicotine usage at all, as I have done previously.
I see this relating to this topic because people say that if a child starts vaping (nicotine), they may develop dependence/addiction and a dependence on nicotine is inherently bad, or equals bad parenting / protection toward a child. I think that point could use further exploration, and fortunately we (society) is choosing to study just how harmful (or risky) is it to be dependent on nicotine even if not smoking. While the ideal of "don't be dependent on anything ever" is a wonderful proposition, it is so extremely rare that I encounter a person not addicted/dependent on something that I no longer feel like we are discussing reality of life on earth when such an assertion is put forth. Kids are very likely (like 99.9% likely) to be already well addicted to sugar before they try nicotine, that it would seem odd/irrational to claim the nicotine addiction will be that which messes them up for life.
With proper gear, and free reign of juice (with whatever level of nic in it), I believe anyone, of any age, would be able to either greatly minimize the effects of smoking on their system, if not eliminate it. So if the current state of affairs around smoking/cigs is going to be about the same going forward, then it would seem highly imprudent to not have greater access to vaping gear to all persons who are observably in a segment of the population that takes up smoking. If zero 15 year olds in the last 10 years are taking up smoking, then I would see little (though some) reason for making sure they have equal access to vaping. Yet, in reality that I've lived in for around 45 years, 13 and up (to 18) is age when many, if not overwhelming majority of people start smoking. But you can't smoke if you are under 18. And yet, under the paradigm of "you can't smoke if you are under 18," there are smokers in that subset of the population who are routinely able to obtain cigarettes, as if no law that the adult population passes really PREVENTS minors from smoking.
Just as no law will prevent minors from vaping. But minors that are vaping will be not purchasing on the open market. NRTs are available on open market. Some even offer their product to 12 and up, thus establishing that a minor is very much permitted to use nicotine, as if there isn't a dispute to be had here and instead is seen as a form of protection toward minors.