The Elephant in the Room

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bored2Tears

Super Member
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2014
713
1,076
Western South Dakota
How about "Warning: diacetyl and / or acetyl propionyl tests results 100 X higher than recommended safety levels for inhalation" or something similar.

My sincere hope is that most likely there are not that many liquids that will be at unsafe levels and need such a label. Self regulation might dictate that as an industry we'd stop selling it if the particular flavoring is that dangerous.

And, I would argue that I still want the freedom of choice to vape that liquid anyway....but at least I was put on notice.
 

Bored2Tears

Super Member
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2014
713
1,076
Western South Dakota
Simple disclaimers could be added.

Examples that I have found on common household cleaners:

Keep out of reach of children (on all things under my sink)
If swallowed ______ (on some things under my sink)
If eye contact, flush with water (on some things under my sink)

Have you ever tried to read the stuff on a Windex bottle? You have to read through the liquid. Makes my eyes tired trying.

Common sense disclaimers but they have to be put on products because you know someone has done one of these.

I understand and agree with this, but what I really want to know is whether or not it's safe to use as intended...for inhalation. If it contains chemicals at levels known to be unsafe for vaping, I'd like to know it.
 

Robino1

Resting in Peace
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
27,447
110,404
Treasure Coast, Florida
I understand and agree with this, but what I really want to know is whether or not it's safe to use as intended...for inhalation. If it contains chemicals at levels known to be unsafe for vaping, I'd like to know it.

I get that and I agree. I would like to know but since I can not be certain with some flavors, I avoid those. But I am a simple person and have found something that I like and have no problem vaping it all day - every day.

I am addressing the labels in regards to kids and comparing it to other possibly hazardous materials that are commonly found around the house. How these are being addressed by companies.
 

Ryedan

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 31, 2012
12,869
19,652
Ontario, Canada
Hasn't teen smoking been at record lows for the past few years?
Couldn't vaping be the reason for that,since vaping in teens has increased in the past few years?

I found this on teen smoking:

okq6nq.jpg


From a peak in 1997 there was a pretty dramatic drop through 2007, when ecigs started to be exported to the US. Since then teen smoking has been dropping at a slower rate. No, I'm not suggesting ecigs caused the slow down :p. This chart ends at 2011. I saw another chart that went to 2013 which had a noticeable drop from 2012, but that can happen one year due to to other reasons than a change in smoker numbers. If I find it again I'll post it.

So from this data, vaping has not yet had an influence on this.
 
Last edited:

Plastic Shaman

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2012
268
190
Albuquerque
I get that and I agree. I would like to know but since I can not be certain with some flavors, I avoid those. But I am a simple person and have found something that I like and have no problem vaping it all day - every day.

I am addressing the labels in regards to kids and comparing it to other possibly hazardous materials that are commonly found around the house. How these are being addressed by companies.

Those chemicals aren't meant to be ingested so their labels aren't really comparable.

I actually don't see an issue with the labels that will be required by the FDA.
 

Bored2Tears

Super Member
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2014
713
1,076
Western South Dakota
I get that and I agree. I would like to know but since I can not be certain with some flavors, I avoid those. But I am a simple person and have found something that I like and have no problem vaping it all day - every day.

I am addressing the labels in regards to kids and comparing it to other possibly hazardous materials that are commonly found around the house. How these are being addressed by companies.

Sure...I understood what you're getting at . And I think it's safe to say that this type of labeling will eventually be required too. I am still in the "finding my all day vape flavor" mode, and was trying out a lot of stuff from a lot of vendors. Labeling as I suggested would make it much easier for me to avoid the flavors. But a lot of vendors are giving only flavoring descriptions...not specifying that there is a note of custard in the flavor. Even if they mention custard, I don't know how predominant it is. If it's at a safe level, I might still vape it.

I went through a period of complete misunderstanding about cinnamaldehyde.... (might be misspelled). As I interpreted everything, the study that created the cinnamon hysteria was off base. But it still makes me nervous to have to try and interpret some science that is over my head.
 

Ryedan

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 31, 2012
12,869
19,652
Ontario, Canada
I think e-cigs are a part of that, but there is also the continually increasing cost of cigarettes, increased laws prohibiting use of cigarettes in certain areas, anti-smoking campaigns...

I don't think cost of cigarettes has much to do with consumption. I posted this chart earlier in the thread, but so people don't have to go back and forth, here it is again:

6pp7vb.jpg


Note that since 2008 taxes went up at an all time high rate, but that period from 2007 through 2011 saw a significantly slower rate of decline for teen smoking than previous years. Or maybe after 2007 only the most enthusiastic teen smokers were trying it and cost has less effect on them.

Cost really does not seem to have any influence on adult smoking numbers.
 
Last edited:

Plastic Shaman

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2012
268
190
Albuquerque
Smoking industry should die.
What about vaping industry? Should it die when the last ex-smoker dies?

Well, besides the fact that you know neither will happen, I think it's dependent on the long terms effects of vaping.

If there is none or a very small amount of side effects, then I don't a reason why. Likewise, yes if there are serious consequences.
 

Jman8

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 15, 2013
6,419
12,928
Wisconsin
So, I see a lot of vapers pointing out the flaws in the reasoning and misperceptions of those opposed to e-cigarettes. However, I really don’t see people talking about the issue that a lot of critics bring up; minors and vaping. I spend a lot of time in shops and checking places out. I have seen many people under 18 vaping and trying to buy e-cigs. Most of the shops in my area are fairly ethical and won’t sell to minors without ID. Even so, I have seen parents who are willing to make these purchases.

I think that the opponents of vaping may have some legitimate points in this matter. My evidence is anecdotal, but I’m willing to wager that there will be studies that show that a number of children are starting to vape. Now, I don’t believe that these products are marketed towards children. Also, I don’t believe that e-cigs are the root of the issue. The fact is that none of us started smoking by accident. We all started smoking for our own reasons, no matter how misguided (I thought that it would make me look cool). The coming generations will continue to do these things for their own reasons, regardless of the existence of e-cigs.

Still, there is going to be a growing population of children vaping. Perhaps the percent of young people who will start using tobacco products will be greater with the advent of vaping. Additionally, there is growing population of adults who have started vaping who never smoked, so I don’t doubt that there is a certain allure to vaping. I’m just curious how other people feel about this. Any comments, thoughts, or death threats are greatly appreciated (I’m kidding about the death threats).

I've read around 33% of posts in this thread. Was glad to see Pamdis post on p.1 of this thread.

IMO, this is the biggest issue of them all with regards to vaping. I often say flavors is the biggest issue, but that's because it is one that will be dealt with (for sure) in my lifetime, and has realistic chance of being overcome soon. The kids vaping one is unrealistic to be met with rigorous, reasonable debate, anytime soon. This isn't my first rodeo, and so far I see emotion far outweighing rigorous debate on this topic.

I strongly believe kids should be allowed to vape. I further believe, and am very prepared to argue, that disallowing kids (as a whole segment of society) to vape is precisely at the core of "what is the problem with vaping."

I am very (very very) aware that I speak from a minority position on this topic. At same time, I do not back down from this debate unless censorship tells me we don't discuss this here. Then I will concede as I realize the majority of adults are very childish on this issue. Incredibly childish.

Kids are going to vape, as OP notes. Your policies, and hypocrisy, will not change this fact. You did 'bad things' when you were 18, but now no one after you should be allowed to do similar things. That equals hypocrisy. Thank God real life doesn't operate in that fashion. Kids are going to vape.

What makes us look bad as a community is not the kids issue. ANTZ logic, rhetoric and trappings are what makes vaping look bad. I say we should allow kids to vape, but that can, or likely will be, spun into a claim that says Jman8 says kids should be vaping. I don't think I'll ever say "kids should be vaping" or anyone should be vaping. But do believe I can be accurately quoted with "everyone should be allowed to vape."

The argument that supports kids being allowed to vape goes way way way deeper than vaping. Most (so called) adults I've met aren't prepared to have that discussion, as is very apparent by their arguments. Most are comfortable with the status quo. I've learned to accept the status quo and not get bent out of shape over these sort of discussions that amount to changing very little. I've learned to accept the idea that planting seeds is the best that can likely be achieved at this point in time.

There many nuances that can be had in this discussion as it relates to vaping, and kids. One that has been noted on this thread already is that it is presumptuous to think kids are automatically going to vape nicotine. When that is removed from the discussion, and yet kids are still vaping, I like to use that as a starting point for why do you really take issue with kids being allowed to vape?
 

rbrylawski

Sir Rod - MOL
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 11, 2014
8,211
34,162
Tampa, FL
I've read around 33% of posts in this thread. Was glad to see Pamdis post on p.1 of this thread.

IMO, this is the biggest issue of them all with regards to vaping. I often say flavors is the biggest issue, but that's because it is one that will be dealt with (for sure) in my lifetime, and has realistic chance of being overcome soon. The kids vaping one is unrealistic to be met with rigorous, reasonable debate, anytime soon. This isn't my first rodeo, and so far I see emotion far outweighing rigorous debate on this topic.

I strongly believe kids should be allowed to vape. I further believe, and am very prepared to argue, that disallowing kids (as a whole segment of society) to vape is precisely at the core of "what is the problem with vaping."

I am very (very very) aware that I speak from a minority position on this topic. At same time, I do not back down from this debate unless censorship tells me we don't discuss this here. Then I will concede as I realize the majority of adults are very childish on this issue. Incredibly childish.

Kids are going to vape, as OP notes. Your policies, and hypocrisy, will not change this fact. You did 'bad things' when you were 18, but now no one after you should be allowed to do similar things. That equals hypocrisy. Thank God real life doesn't operate in that fashion. Kids are going to vape.

What makes us look bad as a community is not the kids issue. ANTZ logic, rhetoric and trappings are what makes vaping look bad. I say we should allow kids to vape, but that can, or likely will be, spun into a claim that says Jman8 says kids should be vaping. I don't think I'll ever say "kids should be vaping" or anyone should be vaping. But do believe I can be accurately quoted with "everyone should be allowed to vape."

The argument that supports kids being allowed to vape goes way way way deeper than vaping. Most (so called) adults I've met aren't prepared to have that discussion, as is very apparent by their arguments. Most are comfortable with the status quo. I've learned to accept the status quo and not get bent out of shape over these sort of discussions that amount to changing very little. I've learned to accept the idea that planting seeds is the best that can likely be achieved at this point in time.

There many nuances that can be had in this discussion as it relates to vaping, and kids. One that has been noted on this thread already is that it is presumptuous to think kids are automatically going to vape nicotine. When that is removed from the discussion, and yet kids are still vaping, I like to use that as a starting point for why do you really take issue with kids being allowed to vape?

In many ways I agree with you. But I don't think an underage person should be able to just walk in a vape store and purchase Vaping gear and juice. I think it should require parental consent and/or accompaniment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread