Me tooI’m truly glad I’m stocked up into my mid 90’s but feel bad for those that aren’t or don’t know. I’ll keep crossing my fingers for those folks that this crazy tax doesn’t pass.
Me tooI’m truly glad I’m stocked up into my mid 90’s but feel bad for those that aren’t or don’t know. I’ll keep crossing my fingers for those folks that this crazy tax doesn’t pass.
Oh cripes.Came across this on elr.
House panel to take up $10B vaping tax Wednesday
House committee has already sent it to the house for a vote. It is a given it will skate through both. My concern is how fast they can implement it. I personally need 3 more weeks.Oh cripes.
It seems there's a startlingly similar bill in the Senate, with roughly 19 co-sponsors:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-116s2463is/pdf/BILLS-116s2463is.pdf
I'm not convinced it's a given, and even if it does make it through both houses, the POTUS would still have to sign it.House committee has already sent it to the house for a vote. It is a given it will skate through both.
The Senate version has an effective date of 180 days after enactment, while the House version becomes effective in the first quarter that starts at least 90 days after enactment.My concern is how fast they can implement it. I personally need 3 more weeks.
Oh crap! Not good!Oh cripes.
It seems there's a startlingly similar bill in the Senate, with roughly 19 co-sponsors:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-116s2463is/pdf/BILLS-116s2463is.pdf
Thank you!I'm not convinced it's a given, and even if it does make it through both houses, the POTUS would still have to sign it.
The Senate version has an effective date or 180 days after enactment, while the House version becomes effective in the first quarter that starts at least 90 days after enactment.
My brain went there as soon as I saw the post on elr.Tin-foil hat mode:
The moment this tax is signed into law, the CDC will announce that they've come to the conclusion that legitimate, mass-market nicotine vapor products have nothing to do with the recent spate of lung illnesses, and that vaping most likely is much safer than smoking.![]()
Oh cripes.
It seems there's a startlingly similar bill in the Senate, with roughly 19 co-sponsors:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-116s2463is/pdf/BILLS-116s2463is.pdf
Time to step the the calls to the white house and tweeting folks. I Vape I vote. We need to make sure Trump knows that if he signs this he is in big trouble with a substantial number of vapers.I'm not convinced it's a given, and even if it does make it through both houses, the POTUS would still have to sign it.
The Senate version has an effective date of 180 days after enactment, while the House version becomes effective in the first quarter that starts at least 90 days after enactment.
But Trump does not need to know that. He just has to think it would cost him votes.While I agree we should shout loud and proud personally when considering a vote vaping would not be at the top of my priority issues list.
Or that it would gain him votes if it passes in both Houses and he vetos it.But Trump does not need to know that. He just has to think it would cost him votes.
Trump knows that he would lose even more votes from the antz if he went against it so I don't see that tactic working, sorry.
While it would not be a deciding factor for me, it would be at the top of my list because any politician willing to put public health at risk by restricting vaping (whether it be through willful ignorance or to promote their own agenda) cannot be trusted and should not be in office.While I agree we should shout loud and proud personally when considering a vote vaping would not be at the top of my priority issues list.
Karl Rove once said that one of the Biggest Mistakes a candidate can make is trying to get Votes on Secondary Issues from voters who aren't going to Vote for Him/Her on Primary Issues. And visa versa.
And that it is Almost Always better to "Play to the Base" when it comes to Single Issue Voters.
Especially when there are no vaping advocates in Washington including anyone I know of running for president.While I agree we should shout loud and proud personally when considering a vote vaping would not be at the top of my priority issues list.
We vape, we vote. Again, I ask. For who?Especially when there are no vaping advocates in Washington including anyone I know of running for president.