The myth of second hand vape
- Thread starter p.opus
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
I think it was that guy in back to the future
Yeah... the Only Good that came out that Movie was this Song.
Yea good idea then we can slap them down where it applies;-) He should most defiantly sport a Provari. O wait is a captain implying its a he? Not very unoffending of me to assume captian justice is a male after all Captain Justice is a many times female maybe the rendition should be transgendered
the government has to demomise it first.
it will will be a gateway drug for the children.its just as bad as analogs.your battery will blow up
in your face.it contains anti-freeze.it harmful to those around you,your children,and most
important of all your pets.
we dont know the long term effects.(they have been studying the ingredients for 20 or more years.)
yada yada yada.
after that it will be like,ok you can do it but we'll have to regulate and tax the bejeebers out of it.
regards
mike
I guess I'm just a sucker for Upbeat Songs that have a Horn Section.
I'm a Rock n' Roller. And will be to the Day I Die. But I also Love Jazz.
That and Waffles.
I think this is what you meant.
If it was, why do you think it is Important that Government does "Demonize" something like this?
That would depend on which form of nicotine delivery is taxed at a higher rate.
Currently that would obviously be combustible tobacco, and it theoretically should always stay that way.
So in light of that I would say no.
They would much rather we continue smoking.
No way is that true. If that was the case they would just start raising taxes on cigarettes, and charge a crazy high price for them proving they have no real concern for our health and only their greed for more money.
Next your going to suggest some states will legalize other smokable stuff and place a high tax rate on it also.
Last edited:
All I know is when the a Country is 16 Trillion (That TRILLION with a "T") in the Hole. And all it's States are Bankrupt. Or Teetering on Bankruptcy, it Doesn't take much of a Reason to Tax Something.
And something that Looks like Smoking Shouldn't be an Exception.
Controversy sells. It may not be a bad thing if there's a public debate with lots of mudslinging. My conclusions are provisional and I appreciate the debates in these threads for offering different source material and perspectives.
I figure I could add by saying that there's a benefit to asking tough questions. One of the first designs for a space capsule burnt up three astronauts because no one thought to ask about or accept the possibility of a short wreaking havoc in an oxygen rich environment. It took a tragedy to learn to blend the air. Seems like a no-brainer now.
I figure I could add by saying that there's a benefit to asking tough questions. One of the first designs for a space capsule burnt up three astronauts because no one thought to ask about or accept the possibility of a short wreaking havoc in an oxygen rich environment. It took a tragedy to learn to blend the air. Seems like a no-brainer now.
Last edited:
I think this second-hand vape myth is nothing but a propaganda peddled by ANTZ to stigmatize, and ultimately ban, all nicotine. They're the same people who get their jollies sticking their noses into our private lives just to make themselves feel superior to the "other guys."
Saying that vaping "poses no public hazard" is not the same thing as saying that it is 100% safe. Nothing is 100% safe, not even oxygen ( http://indianapublicmedia.org/amomentofscience/can-oxygen-be-toxic/). According to some theories oxygen is in fact a key cause of cell degradation (i.e. aging), which eventually leads to death:
So, nothing is 100% safe, and when something is termed safe it actually means that it does not cause undue harm. The OP clearly showed, by way of easily understandable math, "second hand vape" (even in exaggerated amounts) causes no more harm than eating a small amount of potatoes, and it is therefore safe. In fact, the trace amounts of nicotine a "passive vaper" could inhale are so miniscule that even any potential positive effects of it are nonexistent.
Active vaping is another matter, and not the topic of this thread. Vaping might be more hazardous than breathing pure air, but existing studies seem to indicate that the amounts of pg, vg, and nicotine inhaled in normal vaping aren't particularly dangerous, and in any case there is nowhere on this planet where we can actually only inhale pure air, certainly not in cities.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
(http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~wilkins/writing/Samples/shortmed/nelson/radicals.html).
So, nothing is 100% safe, and when something is termed safe it actually means that it does not cause undue harm. The OP clearly showed, by way of easily understandable math, "second hand vape" (even in exaggerated amounts) causes no more harm than eating a small amount of potatoes, and it is therefore safe. In fact, the trace amounts of nicotine a "passive vaper" could inhale are so miniscule that even any potential positive effects of it are nonexistent.
Active vaping is another matter, and not the topic of this thread. Vaping might be more hazardous than breathing pure air, but existing studies seem to indicate that the amounts of pg, vg, and nicotine inhaled in normal vaping aren't particularly dangerous, and in any case there is nowhere on this planet where we can actually only inhale pure air, certainly not in cities.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Could it possibly be that when one inhales a substance which contains PG, VG, flavorings, preservatives and colorings that they exhale something other than water vapor? Look at all the people in this forum stating they have an allergy to PG or VG. Many school districts have banned milk and peanut butter just because of the possibility a child may be allergic. Perhaps when studies testing those who have allergic reactions to PG or VG are conducted, concerning exposure to second hand e-juice, we will have more clarity. There is such a thing as liability, which businesses and government agencies have an interest in.
Certainly NOT all of the States are Bankrupt.
Virginia runs a balanced budget every year. That is why I wish we would issue our own currency...
Anyway...
Delaware, Florida, Virginia, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, and Utah have bond ratings of AAA (greater than the US)
25% baby on top of normal state sales tax, which depending on the locality in Co could hit 10%. So 30% sales tax.. Not chump change.
Now how many other states do you think will get in on that? Honestly? The states are stupid if they don't. The states have raided big tobacco. The states are jumping on the casino band wagon... why not ....
- Status
Similar threads
