Guess it's safe to assume the
dna 75's aren't bottom feeders
now that I come to think about it, I don't think i've ever built a
mod that wasn't a bottom feeder
yeah the dna75 is a bottom feeder too. it's the baby brother to my dna200, winds up almost an inch shorter, it's a single 18650 and it uses a conventional squonk bottle layout of course. I really wanted to wait till I got the dna200's into production and out there before starting on the dna75's, but since the new 510's winded up causing a little bit of a delay and re engineering on the 200's I decided to finish up my production plans for the 75 and try to pump out a few to sell while I wait for the materials I need to finish the 200's. the dna75's are easier to build and will cost less than the 200's, introductory pricing is $440 + shipping in a standard wood or built from your own supplied wood. like the dna200's, if I build some with more exotic woods that I provide then there may be an up charge depending on the cost of the wood.
these dna75's actually are a pretty cool
mod, built with the same precision and design philosophy of building as compact as practical. to me the main reason the dna200 mod outshines these is because for less than an inch of additional height you wind up getting DOUBLE the battery life and the potential for more power, but if you like a really compact mod then these dna75's are pretty cool, assuming 75 watts is enough for you. it def is for me
this same basic mod design shown here could be built as either a dna75 squonker or it could also be built as a 2 cell dna200 non squonk box too for use with an RTA, price would be about the same because the difference in the cost of the chip is made up for by not having to do the fancy squonk hole. just depends on what chip is installed and whether a squonk hole is cut or a second battery wired in. here is a preview before the squonk holes are cut in these 2, bodies are unfinished, just roughed into shape. shown next to my dibi for size comparison, I also sat a 22mm atty on them, again for size comparison