FDA unofficial when will the deeming regs be released office poll.

Status
Not open for further replies.

skoony

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2013
5,692
9,952
68
saint paul,mn,usa
there have been several references in these forums
lately indicating the FDA would be announcing their deeming
regs this month. being its almost the end of the month
and no announcement as of yet i decided to conduct
an ad hoc poll to see what my fellow ECF members think
the release date will be.
i'll guess first.
Friday 07/03/15 is a Federal holiday for the 4th if July
so my prediction would be Thursday 07/02/15 at 4:30 pm
EST.
i would like to hear your predictions and thoughts.

regards
mike
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KattMamma

Painter_

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 21, 2013
615
1,669
In my happy place
Never, after their extensive research they found that e-cigs are as closely related to tobacco as maple syrup is to lumber and e-cigs do not fall under the tobacco rules. Furthermore, they found in their studies that adults can make their own choices when it comes to consumer products and choose not to pursue the issue any further.

Sorry, I fell asleep at the keyboard and was having a happy dream.
 

skoony

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2013
5,692
9,952
68
saint paul,mn,usa
How would "Overlords" work for you?

Or maybe "Child Protective Services" would suffice.
Wait, perhaps that should be "Human Protective Services" instead.

Since Child Protective Services already exists, and does some good work sometimes.
the Department of Goodness and Happy Thoughts.
all is well regards
mike
 

SeniorBoy

VapeFight.com Founder
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 21, 2013
1,735
5,160
Las Vegas, NV
vapefight.com
My guess remains the same and has never changed. The fourth quarter of 2015. Along with Bill's valid point about OMB, I would expect to see more FDA bribed scientific studies released before the final rule appears in the Federal Registry. ALL carefully planned by the FDA to garner as much "support" as possible. I would also NOT expect POTUS to nominate a new FDA Commissioner until after the final rule is published and becomes the law of the land aka the "nanny state". A confirmation hearing hopefully means Public scrutiny and the desk killers don't want that kind of push back, which in their own twisted view, adversely effects the final rule and what Congress may decide.

Just my 2 cents.

:)
 
Last edited:

caramel

Vaping Master
Dec 23, 2014
3,492
10,735
How would "Overlords" work for you?

Or maybe "Child Protective Services" would suffice.
Wait, perhaps that should be "Human Protective Services" instead.

Since Child Protective Services already exists, and does some good work sometimes.

I think @DrMA is calling them the right names.
 

10x sugar

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 13, 2013
547
682
OC, NJ
Never, after their extensive research they found that e-cigs are as closely related to tobacco as maple syrup is to lumber

...or maple flavored candy or maple wood furniture or maple kitchen cabinets!!!

I love this analogy :wub:! I'm a gonna steal it and use it all the time now!
(if that's ok with you Painter):)


Sugar
 

EBates

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Nov 4, 2013
3,858
4,659
Texas
This date sounds about right. At about the same time, the President will be threatening to veto the 2016 budget, and congress will be talking about shutting down the government.

Go Congress Shutdown This House Of Ill Repute Called Govment (purposely misspelled cause it ain't government)!
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,973
San Diego
I submit that "nanny" is a too weak euphemism. Nannies generally do what you pay them to, they don't get a mind of their own and come after you with SWAT teams. A stronger word is needed.
How would "Overlords" work for you?

Or maybe "Child Protective Services" would suffice.
Wait, perhaps that should be "Human Protective Services" instead.

Since Child Protective Services already exists, and does some good work sometimes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread