Utah legislation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jacinda222

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 21, 2010
183
70
Salt Lake, Utah
WooHoo!

:toast:

I was so nervous that I forgot to say half of the things I wanted to (it made me so mad when they were spouting all the BS and I really wanted to debunk some of it). After I was done I was afraid that I'd screwed up royally, so when they put it to the vote I was very happy and relieved that we won!

There were probably 20 students there from BYU who were there to support the bill, as well as several other supporters--they were handing out buttons and everything. I don't know if there were any other vapers there, I just ended up sitting in the middle of the enemy.

Thank goodness for the Representatives that could see sense!
 

Rosco

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Dec 23, 2010
7,124
2,013
73
KCMO:>)
WooHoo!

:toast:

I was so nervous that I forgot to say half of the things I wanted to (it made me so mad when they were spouting all the BS and I really wanted to debunk some of it). After I was done I was afraid that I'd screwed up royally, so when they put it to the vote I was very happy and relieved that we won!

There were probably 20 students there from BYU who were there to support the bill, as well as several other supporters--they were handing out buttons and everything. I don't know if there were any other vapers there, I just ended up sitting in the middle of the enemy.

Thank goodness for the Representatives that could see sense!

Command Performance. Thank you so very much Jacinda. :thumb:
 

JustJulie

CASAA
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 30, 2009
2,848
1,393
Des Moines, IA
Jacinda, you were simply wonderful. :wub: Thank you so much for speaking for all of us and making sure our voices were heard.

I hope people realize what a HUGE victory this was. Keep in mind that Ray had packed the room with his people, people he had lined up to speak well in advance. And despite the fact that we had one day's notice, Utah vapers brought home the win.

:toast:
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Great job, Jacinda!!

Kudos should also be given to afrazier5, Placebo Effect and CASAA Director Ron Ward. Aaron & Greg were out there rallying the troops & gathering intel for the past couple of weeks, Ron was working his .... off all last weekend and this week and all three of them spent time on the phone convincing some Committee members of the errors of this bill. The Committee members you heard asking all of the right questions and who didn't seem to "buy" what the antis were selling were ALL fully schooled by these awesome CASAA members! They knew their stuff and were able to teach the committee members the right questions to ask. Not to mention all of the CASAA members helping behind the scenes. Awesome job everyone!!
 
Last edited:

Jacinda222

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 21, 2010
183
70
Salt Lake, Utah
Kudos should also be given to afrazier5, Placebo Effect and CASAA Director Ron Ward. Aaron & Greg were out there rallying the troops & gathering intel for the past couple of weeks, Ron was working his .... off all last weekend and this week and all three of them spent time on the phone convincing some Committee members of the errors of this bill. The Committee members you heard asking all of the right questions and who didn't seem to "buy" what the antis were selling were ALL fully schooled by these awesome CASAA members! They knew their stuff and were able to teach the committee members the right questions to ask. Not to mention all of the CASAA members helping behind the scenes. Awesome job everyone!!

Yes, big fat huge thank you to all of you! I was actually surprised that most of the members of the committee didn't seem at all convinced by all the BS that was spouted by the antis. Wonderful job!
 

Placebo Effect

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 19, 2008
1,444
1,562
Yes, thank you to everyone involved. Seeing this go down in flames made me smile. Last year a more restrictive version of this bill passed the House, and now it can't even get through Committee.

Here's a rundown of the events. Quotes are not necessarily 100% correct, but I tried to be precise.

- A similar bill passed out of the House last year, but did not progress in the Senate.

- Paul Ray brought a jar of tobacco “candy” products to the meeting. The takeaway of this speech? Unlike cookies, tobacco should not be kept in a jar.

- Paul Ray claimed that e-cigarettes were “precluded” from the bill, but they were not. He later said that the bill did ban “any kind of flavoring being put into the vaporizers,” but he failed to mention the online sales ban. Later, he says that the online sales restriction was removed, but from my reading of the substitute bill, it was not. E-cigarettes, while separately defined from "nicotine product" in the bill, are still products that don't contain tobacco.

- Ray’s brought the following people for presentations: Amy Sands with State Health Department (who runs Tobacco Prevention and Control Program), Barbara Crouch (pharmacist and clinical toxologist – director of Utah Poison Control Center), and Art Hansen (principal of Bonneville High School).

- Amy Sands spoke about tobacco killing 5 million people per year worldwide, implying that smokeless tobacco and e-cigarettes are a part of that problem.

- Barbara Crouch said that the majority of accidental poisoning exposures nationwide involve the ingestion of cigarettes or cigarette butts.

- Barbara Crouch: “The flavored e-cartridges contain potentially lethal amounts to a child, and do not have child-resistance enclosures. So even a few drops from an empty cartridge may be enough to produce a toxic effect in a child.”

- Art Hansen – “Unfortunately through my 25 years of education I’ve seen way too many overdoses in schools. One in particular a couple of years ago where a student was given a prescription patch, he put this patch on his tongue during class, and he started feeling ill. The kid that gave him the patch quickly took him out, trying to get him home. He collapsed and had a severe overdose. I sat there and watched him convulse and seize for about 15 minutes.”

- Representative Mike Morley: “Are these products in any way useful for people who are trying to get off of smoking? I look at it and I say, ‘Yeah,’ in fact, they don’t look like candy to me. They look like a multi-level marketing, you know, alfalfa pills or something. They look gross (laughs). But the question, if someone was going down the road and had a craving to smoke, obviously I would prefer that if it would help them not smoke in their homes or cars with children inhaling those carcinogenic type fumes, and that’s already here and that’s already legal and that’s already happening, would it not be a benefit to have an alternative that would maybe prevent that type of activity?”

- Morley: “I become concerned a little when we start to try to parent our parents. … Where some are legal and some are not, I’m just trying to draw a distinction and say, ‘Gosh, if you have an option to maybe not smoke if someone’s addicted and be able to sustain that behavior and [not be allowed for sale to anyone over 19] it would seem to be very much the same as any product.”

- Rep. Francis Gibson: “Let’s just say it’s not a replacement for smoking. You’ve talked about the nicotine being more powerful than a regular cigarette. What if that’s what I want? I’m an adult. I’m over 19. I smoke cigarettes. I’ve been told I can’t smoke in parks, I can’t smoke in restaurants, all the various areas where I can’t smoke anymore. So now I want to get this. . . . What you’re proposing is we just say ‘Tough, you’re not going to have that product in Utah.’ You talked about the flavors and though you’ve taken out the e-cigarette part you’ve left in the part where you can’t have the flavoring – whatever the flavorings are. We have fruit wine coolers. We have Mike’s Hard Lemonade. All things that if you were to look at them as a kid or anyone else, these are very much alcoholic beverages. I realize that we’re talking about alcohol and cigarettes, but however we’re still not attacking that industry. But there are menthol flavored cigarettes. There are flavored cigarettes.”

- Amy Sands wrongly implied that Washington was considering banning flavored products. She needs to stay more up-to-date on these issues.

- Amy Sands: “There’s mountains of research to show that cigarette smoking will cause lung cancer, cancer in almost every organ of your body, and kill you. The same is true of these products. These are cancer-causing, toxic products. There’s no doubt – all sorts of scientific research to prove that smokeless tobacco products like these addict and they kill.”

- Rep Ray: “Who you guys have heard from the most today are people that are being paid by the tobacco lobby to come up here and convince you one way.”

- Rep Ray: “We know that one third of kids who start using these are going to die at some point in their life from the use of tobacco.”

- Rep. R. Curt Webb: “Was it two years that we had the discussion about flavored malt beverages? This is déjà vu. The exact same arguments were given. They look like soda pop, they smell like soda pop, they’re packaged like soda pop, they’re available easily. So it seems like we’ve heard all these arguments before. We acknowledge that they’re dangerous, we know that they’re dangerous, but our choice in the end was not to ban them but to control how they’re sold. And the controls on how their sold is already in place for tobacco products. We did not ban those beverages. We just changed how they’re sold.”

- Rep Webb: “You’re asking us to go a step further and say they can’t exist at all and responsible adults in a controlled purchasing situation would not be allowed to even have the product available to them.”

- Dave Davis, President of Utah Retail Merchants Association, Utah Food Industry Association: “There seems to be some feeling that if a product has flavor in it, that it’s designed for kids. And quite frankly, I don’t know how all of you are, I enjoy flavors in things. I didn’t lose my taste for flavor when I became 19 years old. . . . We as retailers stand in favor of regulating these products just like we do tobacco products – making sure that they’re behind the counter, making sure that there are penalties imposed on retailers who sell these products to children, making sure that there are penalties imposed on youth who try to purchase these products … I would like to speak on behalf of the kids who perhaps have parents that smoke. Might it be beneficial to them to have their parent, rather than light up that cigarette in the car or around that child, pop one of these products and prevent the second-hand smoke and prevent the 4,000 some odd chemicals that are in a traditional cigarette?”

- Dr. Tom Metcalfe – general pediatrician who represents 580 pediatricians of the Utah chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics: “These products are poisonous and deliver up to twice the nicotine a cigarette does – 3 mg vs. 1.5 mg for a cigarette. … There is no solid evidence that these products actually help adults to quit smoking.”

- Ben Ryan, second-year pediatric resident at Primary Children’s Hospital and co-director of Pediatricians Against Second-Hand Smoke: Talks about children eating keyboard keys and rubber bands. “There were approximately 8700 ingestions of tobacco-containing products in 2009. 80% of those ingestions were in children under the age of 5. 90% of those ingestions were unintentional. 1 in 5 resulted in a visit to a health care facility. … One cigarette alone can kill a child.”

- Representive Gradley G. Last: “I get a little bit concerned about how we throw data around up here. I’ve learned in the legislature that we use data to say anything we want on either side. You’ve just given us information regarding 8700 ingestions, I think you said that was of tobacco. [Ryan says it contains all tobacco-containing products] So all those things you’re talking about are things that are not specifically included in this bill? So those things will still be available for children. So the question I have is do you have any examples, and I don’t care if this is nationwide or worldwide or whatever, of a child that has died because of products that specifically excluded, or included I guess, in this bill? [Ryan: “I can’t give you specific examples.”]"

- Representative Bird: “Don’t we have the same problem with over the counter drugs, Tylenol, that kind of a thing? If a child gets too many of those don’t they have the same issue? Should we not ban those as well?” [directed Ryan]

- Jacinda Ross: “Hello my name is Jacinda Ross and I am here personally to speak for the e-cigarette users. I know that some of the parts of the bill regarding that were taken out, but the flavoring is something that is very important to a lot of us. I haven’t seen the bill’s latest revisions, has the internet sales prohibition been taken out of the current bill? [Ryan appears to say the bill doesn’t apply to e-cigs]. So basically my problem with taking out the ability to have a flavor in it is that that is one thing that really helps a lot of us to switch from smoking to using the e-cigarette. I myself I’m an ex-smoker. I stopped using cigarettes and started using electronic cigarettes about six months ago. I can’t even explain how much of a difference it made in my life to have that for me – to be able to get off of the smoking. I personally use sweet flavors. I like sweet flavors. I use cherry flavor. I use orange flavor. I don’t like the tobacco flavors that are available. I’ve had 3 cigarettes. The first 2 months that I started using the e-cigarette I had 3 actual cigarettes. And the longer period that I used the e-cigarette, the more that I noticed with the real cigarette how awful it tasted. I have another friend who uses cinnamon flavored e-cigarettes, and he was a 3-pack-a-day smoker. He got an e-cigarette to help him cut down on his smoking. He didn’t even intend to completely quit smoking, but after a week and a half, getting used to the cinnamon flavor caused it so that he didn’t like the taste of actual cigarettes anymore and he stopped smoking completely as well. So this is just happening – I don’t think that just because something tastes good that it means children are going to be interested in it. I have 2 teenage sons myself, and the only interest they have in my e-cigarette is making sure that I keep using it so they don’t have to deal with having smoke around them.”

- Liz Zentner – Utah PTA Health Commissioner: “The problem is that a lethal dose of nicotine for children is 10 mg and one of those cartridges contains 500 to over 1000 mg. We are very worried about that. … Don’t be fooled by the slick tactics of tobacco companies and lobbyists.”

- Maddie Buckley (spelling?), student at West High School (98% sure it was West), 15 years old: “If it wasn’t bad for me, I would love to smoke. I love the way it smells. I love the way that my ex-boyfriend looked when he smoked. And honestly when I looked at these products I thought that they looked fantastic and I would love to try them. … when I took a survey for a youth group I work with named Teen Advocates Against Tobacco on these products, I had two friends who said in unison when I explained to them what an e-cigarette was, “Wow, that’s cool.’ I was asked questions about what kind of flavors they have because they kids actually wanted to try them. I know that this isn’t exactly a statistic.” [Note: A hilarious speech, complete with one of the representatives jokingly asking her to narc on her friends that smoke, drink, and/or do drugs]

- Rep. Gibson: “I just wanted to make a comment. You made mention about Big Tobacco lobby. There are people that I have heard him that are not lobbyists. They are e-cigarette people that want the flavor. Granted, the tobacco lobby is in the room, they’re in the hallway, we know that, but there are a lot of citizens that don’t like this as well.”

- Rep. Jackie Biskupski: “I’d love nothing more than to pass this bill out, just to send a message to clean up your act. We’d love that. But I don’t know if we have the votes. But I can say that the arguments around this table about allowing adults to make choices. Well, at what point are you going to legalize ......... so adults can make a choice about that? Come on. We’re really facing a significant issue here. And if the tobacco industry wants to pick up ......... and start moving it, they probably could.”

- Rep. Gage Froerer made motion to hold bill.

- Voted against 8-4.

- Rep. Ray after losing: "Thank you chair, we'll see you next year"
 

Placebo Effect

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 19, 2008
1,444
1,562
Even better news everyone: The bill failed 10-4, not 8-4.

The bill actually failed 10-4.
If you go back and listen to the audio, 14 votes are taken, but the chairman says it failed 8-4. Now, maybe just maybe they don't count the Chair and Vice-Chair in the tally, but if they took 14 votes and the Utah website says 10-4, I'd say the vote was 10-4.
 

mwa102464

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Oct 14, 2009
14,447
12,564
Outside of the Philadelphia Burbs, NJ & Fla
I just listened to that whole meeting and vote, there was some very good discussion there. It really amazes me that the people who where against the ecigs of just how uneducated they really where about not only how they work but how they are saving lives and taking the real cigarettes out of the hands of thousands of people. They think they where knowledgeable but really where clueless about the subject and just wanted to downright vote against the ecigs and outlaw them.

There really needs to be a much bigger marketing campaign about this whole ecig business and how it is changing smokers, saving lives, getting rid of big tobacco who is one of the biggest killing corporations in the world, the biggest. We need the leaders in this industry and the Attorney's, Doctors, Lobbyist, and all the professional within this industry to get to work for all of us and campaign hard and get the real messages out there to not only educate but to help us win this battle against all that want to ban this.

Great job, Jacinda!!
 

Jacinda222

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 21, 2010
183
70
Salt Lake, Utah
- Paul Ray claimed that e-cigarettes were “precluded” from the bill, but they were not. He later said that the bill did ban “any kind of flavoring being put into the vaporizers,” but he failed to mention the online sales ban. Later, he says that the online sales restriction was removed, but from my reading of the substitute bill, it was not. E-cigarettes, while separately defined from "nicotine product" in the bill, are still products that don't contain tobacco.

Yes, that part really confused me. When he first said they had been taken out, I wondered if there had been another amendment made after the recent one. Then when he said the flavors were still included, I didn't know what to think.

And since when I asked he said that the internet sales prohibition didn't apply to e-cigs, I figured it wouldn't then behoove me to address that as a problem...

Either lying or uninformed about his own bill. Sheesh!
 

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,285
7,707
Green Lane, Pa
There is some good in that thought. The E Cig should not be included in any of these conversations, it should not be a legal issue under either pharma or tobacco regulation. It is a device that can and is used my quite a number of people to deliver flavored vapor with no drug component. I normally vape very low nic or no nic liquid when I vape.

The conversation about the product should only be about nicotine liquids. Pipes aren't regulated as a tobacco product even though their principle usage is to deliver tobacco. That should be a point that is driven home to these people. So when he said E cigs were not in the legislation it appears he was separating the hardware from the liquid, except he wasn't saying flavored nicotine liquid, just flavored liquid.
 
The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act gives FDA the authority to regulate 'tobacco products: "The term ‘tobacco product’ means any product made
or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption,
including any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product
(except for raw materials other than tobacco used in manufacturing
a component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product).""
 
Thad, so your saying a pipe is now a tobacco product or an icetool used to bake los snus? That is just crazy. What happens if I decide to produce and market a personal flavor vaporizer to vaporize flavored PG/VG, never entering the tobacco market?

No, not at all. I was just pointing out that the Tobacco Act gives the FDA regulatory authority over tobacco products, including accessories, which means that the agency could issue regulations regarding the marketing of pipes or "e-cigarette" hardware. The components of tobacco products (other than the tobacco itself) are not necessarily tobacco products: In other words, although a pipe or atomizer could be considered tobacco product accessories in FDA regulations, some pipes are for smoking while some are for plumbing and some atomizers are for vaping while some are for air fresheners or fog machines. :vapor: ETA: Another good example is paper. I fully expect the FDA to promulgate regulations on flavored rolling papers and cigarette tubes, but that obviously doesn't mean that all paper products are now considered tobacco products.

It seems to me that most of the authority the FDA has over tobacco products from the FSPTCA is regarding the marketing and packaging. Unfortunately, the FDA is given authority to ban flavors and additives and regulate the amount of nicotine, BUT the bill specifies that the regulations must be based on science. I have no faith that the FDA will change course and act in the interest of public health ahead of personal wealth, but I am hopeful that continued legal actions against the agency will at least help. :rules: The FDA's "bootsrapping ron amok" (as Judge Leon called) it is not new with the e-cigarettes, so the suit that Lorillard and Reynolds have brought against the FDA to point out the conflicts of interest is a good step toward FORCING the FDA to take a less-biased look at tobacco Harm Reduction.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread