Vaping nicotine as a never-smoker, why not?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mr.Mann

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 30, 2011
17,401
40,572
48
All over the place
LOL... so your argument is baseless and fact-less, and you believe anyone cares?

They actually do imply there is some dependency related to nicotine, but they have a very strange test for it:

"Rates of dependence on the nicotine replacement therapies were judged by how many persons were still using 3 weeks after the trial ended "

I always thought the measure of dependence is not the mere fact someone uses something in order to derive some benefit from it. The measure is in what happens when you take it away from them.

If you gave me Devil Dogs during the course of a study, and I kept buying them on my own after the study was over, it might just be because I like them. A lot. But it would not be proof of a dependency, by any definition I'm aware of. (and I did not see anything to the effect that the NRTs were or were not made available, for free, after the study, for whatever that might matter)

My understanding (of it and other thinking on it) was that nicotine in and of itself is not exactly the issue but the way it is delivered and what else it is combined with that has dependency implications.
 

Jman8

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 15, 2013
6,419
12,928
Wisconsin
It seems half the new vapers on here are just looking to blow clouds, yet you seem to think teens, who are indestructible in their own minds, are vaping as smoking cessation?

I think it is both answers and probably more reasons why teens vape. Hence why I sometimes think so called common sense is common stereotyping and/or soundbite logic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AndriaD

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
If they did smoke, ever, and especially if they started chewing nic gum as a cessation method, then that is totally irrelevant to this discussion on the dependency affect to never smokers. Why does this point have to be made, repeatedly? Can we not even agree that the experiences of smokers or ex smokers is irrelevant to never smokers?

People who were never smokers get just as addicted to chew. What do chew and cigarettes have in common?
 

Mr.Mann

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 30, 2011
17,401
40,572
48
All over the place
If they did smoke, ever, and especially if they started chewing nic gum as a cessation method, then that is totally irrelevant to this discussion on the dependency affect to never smokers. Why does this point have to be made, repeatedly? Can we not even agree that the experiences of smokers or ex smokers is irrelevant to never smokers?

I agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coldrake

Jman8

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 15, 2013
6,419
12,928
Wisconsin
I don't care what they do, but find it amusing when some say teens are vaping as smoking cessation. I also don't believe it when they say teens are vaping 0 nic. They may tell their parents that, but I would really find that hard to believe. Same as if little Johnny told his parents he drinks beer, but only non alcoholic beer. Kids are drinking hand sanitizer for a buzz these days...

I'll also just add that I think teens are hip to the idea that if you vape, you can still smoke and likely not get as addicted as mom and dad did, because you have more options than they did. I do think it is very likely some teens won't even encounter addiction to smoking because of existence of vaping, whereas we who experienced addiction to smoking have a different perspective. We think if you smoke at all, you'll likely at some point become addicted to smoking and that it might take years of useless agony before you break that type of addiction. I think teens and never smokers will very unlikely experience that addiction, and because vaping has so many options for controlling nic level, plus so many options for flavoring, it is possible that the older dogs won't realize the many tricks the younger pups are able to utilize. I do know that most of us wish we had the vaping option growing up, and do instinctively recognize things would've been vastly different if we had both options from the get go. I highly doubt there would be millions of adults who are self convinced that there is no way out of the smoking trap.

I think kids are always going to experiment with various crazes, especially if adults continue to take things ultra seriously and tell half truths about what using entails. All while having their many parties that seek to imbibe in the, ahem, mature way.
 

englishmick

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 25, 2014
6,606
35,904
Naptown, Indiana
(I do not buy the inhalation theory, short of actual evidence, because it is my understanding that the majority of nicotine absorbed while vaping is done through the mouth, nose and throat tissues, not the lungs. This is very often discussed here, and I assume that to be true.

I used to believe that, because it was said here a lot and nobody contradicted it. A while ago someone argued quite convincingly that it might not be true. Partly that was based on the fact that, although it was said regularly, nobody appeared to know where it came from originally. The other part was that vaping had changed. Not so long ago vaping tended to be low powered, with low airflow. You couldn't suck much air through a low powered cartridge so not a lot actually went down into the lungs. With modern high powered devices and huge airflow you can fill your lungs with no trouble. So maybe in the past most of the nic was absorbed in the mouth and throat because that's as far as it got.

I don't know the truth of this. Just saying it might not be the case.
 

Amraann

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 24, 2011
3,030
10,552
54
Florida
Everyone who has smoked started out as a never smoker...
I think vaping can be addictive, whether one was a smoker or not...

That is true but my point is that a never smoking person who vapes is highly unlikely to start smoking. Vaping is not a gateway to smoking.

If someone who vapes was going to smoke IMO they would have just gone straight to smoking
 

VNeil

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 30, 2014
2,726
6,868
Ocean City, MD
My understanding (of it and other thinking on it) was that nicotine in and of itself is not exactly the issue but the way it is delivered and what else it is combined with that has dependency implications.
I was merely taking issue with their "test" for dependency. They go on to state different rates of continuation based on different methods, but the rates of continuation could have been due to different methods delivering different basic benefits to the users. Without testing the effect of discontinuing use I don't see any way they can determine dependence.

Let's say someone does a test related to orange juice. One control group eats oranges every morning. The other drinks a glass or two.

At the end of the test, they come back 3 weeks later to see who continues to ingest orange juice in the same way they were previously tested.

They find that orange juice drinkers were twice as likely to still be drinking orange juice, verses those eating fresh oranges.

They determine orange juice is more likely to create a dependence.

Do you agree with that methodology or logic?
 

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
I used to believe that, because it was said here a lot and nobody contradicted it. A while ago someone argued quite convincingly that it might not be true. Partly that was based on the fact that, although it was said regularly, nobody appeared to know where it came from originally. The other part was that vaping had changed. Not so long ago vaping tended to be low powered, with low airflow. You couldn't suck much air through a low powered cartridge so not a lot actually went down into the lungs. With modern high powered devices and huge airflow you can fill your lungs with no trouble. So maybe in the past most of the nic was absorbed in the mouth and throat because that's as far as it got.

I don't know the truth of this. Just saying it might not be the case.

Its one of those vaping myths...
 

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
That is true but my point is that a never smoking person who vapes is highly unlikely to start smoking. Vaping is not a gateway to smoking.

If someone who vapes was going to smoke IMO they would have just gone straight to smoking

It's a lot easier for teens not to get caught vaping than smoking. The recent poll posted on here showed there are twice as many dual users as there are dedicated vapers...
 

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
They actually do imply there is some dependency related to nicotine, but they have a very strange test for it:

"Rates of dependence on the nicotine replacement therapies were judged by how many persons were still using 3 weeks after the trial ended "

Here's what I'm wondering: was this a "test" of never-smokers? Or was this a test of the ability of NRT to help smokers break their dependence?

Because 3 wks is just about long enough to reach the first really hard test of one's determination; it's certainly not long enough to break a decades-long dependence.

I only drank for about 13 yrs. So it would seem to be a far easier dependence to break than my 39-yr addiction to cigarettes, wouldn't it? But I don't think I was really free of my alcohol dependence for at least 10 yrs after quitting, maybe longer. And even after near-23 yrs of sobriety, there are still triggers that cause the craving -- sundown is a big one, it happens every day. :D I don't get the trigger every day, but sometimes, if I happen to be outdoors or riding in a vehicle just at sundown, just something about the air and the sky sends the msg to my brain: time for happy hour! :facepalm:

I smoked for 39 yrs. If I can manage to get free of that addiction enough to consider quitting vaping inside ten years, I'll be amazed. I told the doc maybe 5 yrs, but I'd call that wildly optimistic.

Andria
 

supertrunker

Living sarcasm
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 12, 2012
11,151
52,107
Texas
I was merely taking issue with their "test" for dependency. They go on to state different rates of continuation based on different methods, but the rates of continuation could have been due to different methods delivering different basic benefits to the users. Without testing the effect of discontinuing use I don't see any way they can determine dependence.

Let's say someone does a test related to orange juice. One control group eats oranges every morning. The other drinks a glass or two. Drinking the same thing is not a control group.

One group has no teeth. I'm happy making assumptions.

At the end of the test, they come back 3 weeks later to see who continues to ingest orange juice in the same way they were previously tested.

They find that orange juice drinkers were twice as likely to still be drinking orange juice, verses those eating fresh oranges.
because it's a lot easier.

They determine orange juice is more likely to create a dependence. Compared to whole oranges.

Do you agree with that methodology or logic?


T
 

supertrunker

Living sarcasm
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 12, 2012
11,151
52,107
Texas
Here's what I'm wondering: was this a "test" of never-smokers? Or was this a test of the ability of NRT to help smokers break their dependence?

Because 3 wks is just about long enough to reach the first really hard test of one's determination; it's certainly not long enough to break a decades-long dependence.

I only drank for about 13 yrs. So it would seem to be a far easier dependence to break than my 39-yr addiction to cigarettes, wouldn't it? But I don't think I was really free of my alcohol dependence for at least 10 yrs after quitting, maybe longer. And even after near-23 yrs of sobriety, there are still triggers that cause the craving -- sundown is a big one, it happens every day. :D I don't get the trigger every day, but sometimes, if I happen to be outdoors or riding in a vehicle just at sundown, just something about the air and the sky sends the msg to my brain: time for happy hour! :facepalm:

I smoked for 39 yrs. If I can manage to get free of that addiction enough to consider quitting vaping inside ten years, I'll be amazed. I told the doc maybe 5 yrs, but I'd call that wildly optimistic.

Andria


The dreaded 3's. 3 weeks, months and so on.

T
 

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
The dreaded 3's. 3 weeks, months and so on.

T

Exactly. I've heard that 3 days is a bad one too, but at 3 days smoke-free I was so euphoric about going 3 days without smoking and NOT MISSING IT AT ALL, I didn't notice. It was at 3 wks that my euphoria was suddenly assaulted by depression. And again at 3 months.

Andria
 

VNeil

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 30, 2014
2,726
6,868
Ocean City, MD
Here's what I'm wondering: was this a "test" of never-smokers? Or was this a test of the ability of NRT to help smokers break their dependence?

Because 3 wks is just about long enough to reach the first really hard test of one's determination; it's certainly not long enough to break a decades-long dependence.

I only drank for about 13 yrs. So it would seem to be a far easier dependence to break than my 39-yr addiction to cigarettes, wouldn't it? But I don't think I was really free of my alcohol dependence for at least 10 yrs after quitting, maybe longer. And even after near-23 yrs of sobriety, there are still triggers that cause the craving -- sundown is a big one, it happens every day. :D I don't get the trigger every day, but sometimes, if I happen to be outdoors or riding in a vehicle just at sundown, just something about the air and the sky sends the msg to my brain: time for happy hour! :facepalm:

I smoked for 39 yrs. If I can manage to get free of that addiction enough to consider quitting vaping inside ten years, I'll be amazed. I told the doc maybe 5 yrs, but I'd call that wildly optimistic.

Andria
My error I think. That looks like it was a smoking cessation aftermath test. In the spirit of the great Emily Litella... Never Mind!
 

VNeil

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 30, 2014
2,726
6,868
Ocean City, MD
Exactly. I've heard that 3 days is a bad one too, but at 3 days smoke-free I was so euphoric about going 3 days without smoking and NOT MISSING IT AT ALL, I didn't notice. It was at 3 wks that my euphoria was suddenly assaulted by depression. And again at 3 months.

Andria
My final day 4 and 5... I experienced such Hell I vowed never, ever to put myself through that again. Interestingly, 7 weeks before, I quit totally within days of starting to vape, and I have no recollection of a terrible day 4-5. But I ended up relapsing after only a week when I returned home to my smoking wife and the temptation was too great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluecat

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
My error I think. That looks like it was a smoking cessation aftermath test. In the spirit of the great Emily Litella... Never Mind!

Well in that case, their "test" is utterly worthless; maybe they should have tested to see who was still using it at 3 YEARS. ;)

Andria
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread