Sorry for the long post title.
It has been 9 days "analog" free.
I am very curious if anyone knows the actual science behind the differences between an addiction to tobacco, particularly burning tobacco as in "analogs", and just pure nicotine itself as in heated vapor or otherwise, and possibly what the brain goes through when "analogs" are stopped but nicotine is still being supplied via other means (when all those other chemicals are removed from the equation).
Say if someone was using cigarettes to "self medicate" for depression/anxiety. Is it the product/chemicals of burning tobacco combined that really "help" them, or is it mainly the nicotine? Or do we even know? I have read that nicotine itself either isn't an MAOI or it is but it's a less effective one without the other chemicals in burning tobacco. So to this end, shouldn't it be reasonable to conclude that quitting "analogs", even if you switch to vaping, could/should still have an effect on those neurotransmitters? Has this been established? And if so...should it be reasonable to conclude that once free of analogs, quitting vaping down the road (or even, not quitting vaping, but using 0 nic juice) would be easier than quitting analogs once you've been freed of them for an extended time? Not in terms of the hand-to-mouth, inhale-exhale addictive behavior that you can still satisfy with 0 nic, but as in actually what happens in your brain, chemically.
I ask because I have been told that it is not just the nicotine that creates the shift in neurotransmitters and elevated mood that we perceive from cigarettes, which is why replacing nicotine itself as in patches, gums, etc doesn't work as often, as the nicotine itself isn't wholly responsible for these effects on mood. I have also been told the exact opposite. And am having trouble finding research to point in either direction. ALSO wondering if our "heating" it via vaporizing makes it any different to our brains than other delivery methods (patch, gum, lozenge) besides the inhale-exhale part.
Yes I know there haven't been tons of studies. But I also know some of you are hardcore in studying all the studies lol and some of you here are actually in fields where you might know or understand this all a bit more than me. And being that a lot of you "study the studies" I figure there are some veterans who might be more well versed in this particular topic.
It has been 9 days "analog" free.
I am very curious if anyone knows the actual science behind the differences between an addiction to tobacco, particularly burning tobacco as in "analogs", and just pure nicotine itself as in heated vapor or otherwise, and possibly what the brain goes through when "analogs" are stopped but nicotine is still being supplied via other means (when all those other chemicals are removed from the equation).
Say if someone was using cigarettes to "self medicate" for depression/anxiety. Is it the product/chemicals of burning tobacco combined that really "help" them, or is it mainly the nicotine? Or do we even know? I have read that nicotine itself either isn't an MAOI or it is but it's a less effective one without the other chemicals in burning tobacco. So to this end, shouldn't it be reasonable to conclude that quitting "analogs", even if you switch to vaping, could/should still have an effect on those neurotransmitters? Has this been established? And if so...should it be reasonable to conclude that once free of analogs, quitting vaping down the road (or even, not quitting vaping, but using 0 nic juice) would be easier than quitting analogs once you've been freed of them for an extended time? Not in terms of the hand-to-mouth, inhale-exhale addictive behavior that you can still satisfy with 0 nic, but as in actually what happens in your brain, chemically.
I ask because I have been told that it is not just the nicotine that creates the shift in neurotransmitters and elevated mood that we perceive from cigarettes, which is why replacing nicotine itself as in patches, gums, etc doesn't work as often, as the nicotine itself isn't wholly responsible for these effects on mood. I have also been told the exact opposite. And am having trouble finding research to point in either direction. ALSO wondering if our "heating" it via vaporizing makes it any different to our brains than other delivery methods (patch, gum, lozenge) besides the inhale-exhale part.
Yes I know there haven't been tons of studies. But I also know some of you are hardcore in studying all the studies lol and some of you here are actually in fields where you might know or understand this all a bit more than me. And being that a lot of you "study the studies" I figure there are some veterans who might be more well versed in this particular topic.