We are now being called drug addicted trolls...

[Factor52]

Article on: Healthnewsdigest (dot)com
I never realized there could be haters like this:

Posted by Electricman in comments on article:

"The only people claiming this drug addiction is safe are the ecigger addicts who
like any other addictions (MODERATED),......, nicotine look for any little
meaningless bits of information on why their drug addiction is safe.
"The
only acceptable safety standard for a non-essential recreational drug with not
being exposed to it at all.” NOT some junk posted by casa(Consumer Addicts
Should Advocate Addiction) who profit from your addiction and would like to
addict your family and children to this dangerous addiction

And
e-cigarette proponents alone bear the entire burden of proving their product
safe for use around others by this standard. The public does NOT owe it to them.


Real nice that casaa posted a link to this and told all the ecig trolls
to attack this blog .Elaine and the rest of the ecig trolls that want to addict
YOU and your children to this dangerous drug.....the more they addict the more
profit they make ....what a shame"

 

[volume control]

Opinions are like aholes, and aholes happen to have a lot of them.

 

[tj99959]

Gee, I wonder how he really feels about e-cigs.

 

[Byten]

"A trolling we go, a trolling we go, High ho the dairy oh.."

They allow "guest" comment posting... tee he, tee he.

 

[SweetSpot]

Oh well, we all gotta die from something, why not let it be something that lets your lungs be pink again and keeps you in control of your faculties.

 

[EddardinWinter]

I feel dirty from responding to that person.

 

[Rickajho]

Gee, I see some people at risk for dying of .... retentive anger management issues.

Fortunately there were far more positive posts than negative at that site.

 

[Mac]

LOL @ CASAA making a profit

 

[jerseyrob]

I prefer to think of myself as a vaping knome not a Troll . Troll's are ugly. Knome's are beautiful .

 

[jimrug1]

While there can be an "intelligent" debate on the pros and cons of vaping, the comment posted by the op does not come from a mature, intelligent, or informed individual. To respond to his comment merely lowers the integrity of the discussion.

 

[MDV39]

Article on: Healthnewsdigest (dot)com
I never realized there could be haters like this:

Posted by Electricman in comments on article:

"The only people claiming this drug addiction is safe are the ecigger addicts who
like any other addictions ...., coke,......, nicotine look for any little
meaningless bits of information on why their drug addiction is safe.
"The
only acceptable safety standard for a non-essential recreational drug with not
being exposed to it at all.” NOT some junk posted by casa(Consumer Addicts
Should Advocate Addiction) who profit from your addiction and would like to
addict your family and children to this dangerous addiction

And
e-cigarette proponents alone bear the entire burden of proving their product
safe for use around others by this standard. The public does NOT owe it to them.


Real nice that casaa posted a link to this and told all the ecig trolls
to attack this blog .Elaine and the rest of the ecig trolls that want to addict
YOU and your children to this dangerous drug.....the more they addict the more
profit they make ....what a shame"

I'm sorry but did he just call me an ecigger? WTH

 

[fwellers]

Wow. I bet it takes that person a long time in the bathroom. Only constant constipation can bring out that kind of vitriol.

 

[MarleysChains]

I think my favorite part of that entire rant was "The only acceptable safety standard for a non-essential recreational drug with not
being exposed to it at all".

What the hell is an essential recreational drug? I didn't think any recreational drug was essential.

 

[jimrug1]

I'm sorry but did he just call me an ecigger? WTH

He's fishing (and using live bait) don't bite .... ;-)~

 

[jimrug1]

I think my favorite part of that entire rant was "The only acceptable safety standard for a non-essential recreational drug with not
being exposed to it at all".

What the hell is an essential recreational drug? I didn't think any recreational drug was essential.

I can think of many that are much more fun than nicotine!

 

[Byten]

While there can be an "intelligent" debate on the pros and cons of vaping, the comment posted by the op does not come from a mature, intelligent, or informed individual. To respond to his comment merely lowers the integrity of the discussion.

So you agree that the goal should instead be to lower the integrity until no is paying attention anymore? So much fun.. lol!

Nice to see that page is blowing up a little bit.

 

[MrSmith99]

I left a nice reply to the article itself which didn't seem too biased. I wasn't going to respond to the troll called Electricman. Let him eat static!

I did notice that I couldn't see the comments in my Firefox browser because I have so many filter plug-ins to weed out nefarious code in web pages. I had to open the page in IE to see everything.

 

[Extraunordinary]

I wonder if he drinks coffee or soda... Just sayin'.

 

[J.R. Bob Dobbs]

ive said it before, ill say it again...

 

[jimrug1]

So you agree that the goal should instead be to lower the integrity until no is paying attention anymore? So much fun.. lol!

Nice to see that page is blowing up a little bit.

Ummm NO!! My point was to ELEVATE the integrity of the argument by expressing opinions based on current research as devoid of emotion as possible. To get into a "shooting match" with the emotional and uninformed comments of the poster that the OP sited, would be to decrease the validity of a well researched argument.