Quoted From the article... "Really? Actually Christians have only believed this for about 140 years." I don't really want to get into an argument about the rapture. I think there are scriptures that allow us to contemplate pre-trib, mid-trib and post-trib possibilities. And to adamantly stand on one position is to ignore the scriptures that support the other options. BUT.... no matter what you believe, that quote is a typical ad-hominem fallacy. To argue that something is not true because no one has believed it before is bad logic. That dog don't hunt. I don't mind listening to someone who is logical and can really prove a point but to tell me something isn't true because someone else didn't believe it, is absurd. Worse yet, to try to convince me that something else is true because someone else didn't believe in the opposing theology is even more absurd.
I will admit... that as soon as I read the opening few statements, I stopped. I just can't listen to someone who's premise is false from the get-go.
(dang... I didn't come here to do this.... and yet here I am. Oh well. I guess if your gonna jump in, it might as well be with both feet.)
Blessings
I will admit... that as soon as I read the opening few statements, I stopped. I just can't listen to someone who's premise is false from the get-go.
(dang... I didn't come here to do this.... and yet here I am. Oh well. I guess if your gonna jump in, it might as well be with both feet.)
Blessings