We adjust power to reach a desired temperature based on the mass of our coil. So if there is fact behind formaldehyde forming at higher temperatures, there is nothing that sates one action, be it MTL or DTL is void of reaching these concerning temperatures.
That's been exactly my whole point from the start. If you dig a little deeper, you will find that the "experiment" that produced the colorful graph I was criticizing was carried out by someone who had been openly guessing that cloud chasers probably need to worry more about formaldehyde levels so you can keep arguing all you want, the classical bias is still visible and clear to just about anyone who is willing to just look.
An individual can prefer a hotter or cooler vape with MTL just the same as an individual who DTL vapes. We can see this with TC users from both camps. The temperature is set as a preference, power is applied to reach that set temperature and adjusted based on the mass of the coil. Both are vaping at the same temperature (as estimated by the TCR) regardless of their power setting or style of vaping.
The total surface area of the coil build cannot be ignored, as it has a direct impact on the amount of vapor production, and, logically, many people are going to wrongfully assume inhaling more vapor probably means inhaling more formaldehyde if the temperature is the same. I.e., you are still forgetting what I said previously, that the longer the juice remains at or near the overheated areas of the coils before it evaporates, the longer it keeps forming formaldehyde.
This can also be viewed and modeled (as a guidance) with Steam Engine. Heat Flux is a measurement of radiant heat. A low mass coil, usually associated with MTL users, requires less power to reach the same Heat Flux as a coil of higher mass that is usually associated with DTL users. Despite the required power change, due to the mass of the coil, heat flux can remain the same.
Now you are confusing surface area with mass. Actually mass is irrelevant, as the ramp up time of a coil as a function of power is mainly determined by volume, not mass. Specifically, it is determined by volume in cohort with the VHC, or volumetric heat capacity of the given metal type. But we aren't discussing the ramp up time so both the mass and the volume are irrelevant to what we are discussing. That is, aside from the general fact it's often easier to increase the surface area by increasing the volume than it is by decreasing the thicknesses of the wire strands. But anyway... Heat flux per watt is directly proportional to surface area.
What is missing from these formaldehyde tests is the characteristics of the coils used. Increase the power to a low mass coil and I am open to the fact you may be reaching temperatures that should be of concern. But if the tests were to involve a coil of higher mass, then the power should be adjusted accordingly. This is not a case of ones vaping style always equals higher temperatures therefore increased risk of formaldehyde forming.
You are still forgetting what I tried to explain previously, that:
- the airflow characteristics,
- the evaporation rate,
- the relationship between both,
- the wicking capacity of the coils,
- that of the wicks inside them,
- the viscosity of the juice,
- how that changes across different temperatures,
- the boiling temperature of the juice,
- the surface area of the coils,
- the size and topology of the tiny cavities and crevasses between the individual wire strands through which juice is flowing that can be linked together in a complex way, and
- how the combination of all of the above factors affects the different speeds at which said juice is flowing from there to where, plus
- how that also affects heat transfer on all fronts,
ALL play a significant part as for the different temperatures that occur and for how much time how much juice of the given type remains at every one of all these different temperatures before evaporating. (I probably forgot to mention additional factors like the temperature the juice was at before the start of the pull, for example, but anyway, you get the idea.)