A possible explanation and a request...

Status
Not open for further replies.

MyNameisStitch

New Member
Apr 29, 2009
3
0
Hello everyone!
I'm relatively new to the whole e-cig world. I purchased a 901 about 4 weeks ago and I am proud to report that i've only had 3 cigarettes since then. I just thought I would pass along some news reports that are very upsetting and might help explain why PureSmoker is having such difficulty keeping stock. The site won't allow me to post URLs yet so I will quote the articles below.

This uncertainty scares me as i've found this to be a great alternative to a very disgusting habit that I would not want to go back to. I'm sure it is also very scary for Steve and Mrs. Cash who now have alot invested into this.

In my small 2 transactions with them i've found PureSmoker's customer service and product to be outstanding and i'd like to ask that everyone keep this new information in mind because it is something entirely beyond their control.

Thanks for your time!
-Jake W.
 

MyNameisStitch

New Member
Apr 29, 2009
3
0
From NPR

Entrepreneurs are always trying to come up with new products for smokers: a nicotine lollipop or a bottle of Nico Water to give you that fix when you can't light up.

Those products didn't pass muster with the Food and Drug Administration. And now, the agency is taking a closer look at the latest trend: electronic cigarettes.

At the smoke-free Tyson's Corner shopping mall in McLean, Va., Clarence Chatman puffs away on what appears to be a lit cigarette; little white clouds billow from his nostrils.

"That's funny," Chatman says. "So even though smoke is coming out, you're not smoking."

He's trying a Liberty electronic cigarette, a stainless steel tube with a battery that heats up a nicotine solution. Chatman takes a drag of the resulting vapor.

"You have to pull on it real hard in order to get something out of it," he says. "And then you feel the nicotine when you're letting the smoke out."

The "smoke" is actually just water vapor. "I could see getting in a lot of trouble: 'Hey! You can't smoke in here!'" Chatman says. "But it's not smoke."

Chatman, a tourist from Rochester, N.Y., wants to quit after 35 years of smoking — a desire sparked by this month's 62-cent per pack increase in the federal cigarette tax.

The budding electronic cigarette industry targets smokers like Chatman at kiosks in malls and on the Internet.

Health Claims Probed

E-cigarettes, as they are called, come in a variety of flavors: coffee, chocolate, mint, apple — and yes, tobacco. But they don't contain any tobacco.

In an advertisement, the maker of one e-cigarette, Smoking Everywhere, claims, "Fact: Smoking Everywhere electronic cigarette is the healthier way to smoke." That claim raises a red flag for government regulators.

"We're concerned about the potential for addiction to and abuse of these products," says FDA spokeswoman Rita Chappelle. "Some people may mistakenly perceive these products to be safer alternatives to conventional tobacco use."

The agency has opened an investigation and has refused to allow e-cigarettes, e-cigars and e-pipes to cross the border because they're considered new drugs that require FDA approval.

But the industry questions the FDA's jurisdiction.

Who Has Jurisdiction?

"Like a traditional cigarette, this product is not intended to produce a therapeutic effect," says Walt Linscott, legal counsel for Smoking Everywhere Inc. "It is not a drug, if you will. This is an adult smoking experience, and it should be thought of and regulated in that similar construct."

The Supreme Court has ruled that the FDA does not have the authority to regulate tobacco. But a bill pending in Congress would give the agency that power and allow it to reduce nicotine levels. Linscott argues that e-cigarettes could be an effective bridge in that process.

Anti-smoking advocates wonder whether that could be the case.

"I think there's a lot of possibilities; it's intriguing," says Thomas Glynn with the American Cancer Society. "But it needs to go through some rigorous testing before the public health community would feel comfortable with it."

Glynn says similar nicotine-only products haven't caught on, in part because smokers are so tied to the ritual of smoking. E-cigarettes could be different, Glynn says, if FDA-reviewed clinical studies show they are safe and effective.

"Any product that we ingest, we'd like to see go through the Food and Drug Administration," Glynn says. "I mean, we know more, to be honest, about what's in dog food and macaroni and cheese than we know what's in tobacco in this country. And there's no reason to introduce yet another product where we don't know what we're ingesting."

Under Pressure To Act

Back at the mall, Chatman says that for now, he won't spend $60 on an electronic cigarette starter kit.

"I like the idea of no smoke, and you can puff it wherever you want to," he says. "But I don't know. I was trying to weigh the cost."

It's unclear how much longer Chatman will have to weigh his options.

The FDA's investigation is ongoing, and the agency is under pressure from public health advocates, including New Jersey Democrat Sen. Frank Lautenberg, to take electronic cigarettes off the market until they are proved to be safe.
 

MyNameisStitch

New Member
Apr 29, 2009
3
0
From WJLA
New Questions About Safety of E-Cigarettes

TYSONS CORNER, Va. - E-Cigarettes, they're marketed as a way for smokers to get a nicotine fix without paying high taxes and facing bans on lighting up in public places. But there are new questions about the safety of the battery-powered "Electronic Cigarettes" that are showing up on the Internet and in stores across our area.
"It's still much much healthier, why?

Owners of this Smoking Everywhere franchise at Tysons Corner bailed on interview, so with hidden camera rolling we get the sales pitch.

"You don't get your chemicals at all. No tobacco, no tar, no carbon monoxide," said the sales person

But hang on. On Friday, Canada's equivalent of the FDA says they do contain propylene glycol. Health Canada has banned the sale of electronic cigarettes saying, "these products may pose health risks and have not been fully evaluated for safety, quality, and efficacy."
"I'm more concerned about the 600 carcinogens in the average cigarette, but it is an addictive substance and you are inhaling it into your lungs, and I'm not sure we have any data that tell us what happens with chronic inhalation of nicotine," Washington Hospital Center's Mark Soberman, MD.

The U.S. FDA has blocked 17 import shipments of electronic cigarettes, saying in a statement, "These products offered for import appear to require FDA approval to be legally marketed in the U.S. and have not been reviewed by the agency." But the FDA has stopped short of seizing inventory already here.

"It's much healthier," said the sales person.

Inventory marketed to ABC 7 News as a way to quit smoking.

"Like the patch, the bubble gum with nicotine -- it's exactly the same. But you can actually feel like you are smoking a real cigarette,"

A claim even one Dallas-based E-cigarette retailer denied.

"The electronic cigarette is not a cessation device, it will help people smoke in a healthier way and maybe give them the convenience to smoke everywhere," Ohad Naim, a franchise owner, said.

But Ernest Oviedo hopes to use it to kick the habit.

"I want to quit smoking," he said. "I like smoking, but I know it's bad so I just want to give it a try."

While the device can cost up to $150 and offers nicotine in several flavors -- including chocolate, cherry, and vanilla -- the FDA and doctors worry young people may start using the product.
The retailers say they only sell to people 18 years of age and older.

The bottom line, experts say, more research is needed.
 

Majestic

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 11, 2009
956
269
N.E. Wisconsin
I suspect the political motivation behind the FDA's actions are......

1. Elected officials are worried about the decline in cigarette tax revenue as the popularity of e-cigs grows. Let's face it, the continued bumping up of the cigarette tax under the guise of public health/expense is a quick fix for balancing their budgets or to generate revenue for new programs with little public outcry. With e-cigs sales, no sin tax is received and most states lose out the general sales tax as well.

2. Big tobacco is worried about the decline in their sales due to e-cigs popularity. Although analogs have fell out of public favor, it's still a big industry with lobbists.

3. The drug companies are ticked the e-cig market sort of passed them by. Not only do e-cigs cut into their profitable smoking cessation product sales, but had they been the ones to market e-cigs under FDA regulation they could have inflated the prices accordingly.

Just my .02 cents worth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread