Acetyl Proprionyl, Diacetyl, Acetoine HELP

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mowgli

Runs with scissors
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 25, 2013
8,723
36,953
Taxachusetts
One Way or Another

#LilTimeOnTheMountain

James said they added suppliers and continued using FW for some things.
He told us they don't use FW Butterscotch anymore ATT.


Good show :thumb:
I can't see it at YT because I don't allow Macromedia on my puter but The Alfred College show is a good one.
I have 1350 CDRs of Live Dead from 1966 - Feb 1979
 

DeadbeatJeff

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Mar 6, 2014
1,273
949
Rochester, NY
store.coilsociety.com
James said they added suppliers and continued using FW for some things.
He told us they don't use FW Butterscotch anymore ATT.


Good show :thumb:
I can't see it at YT because I don't allow Macromedia on my puter but The Alfred College show is a good one.
I have 1350 CDRs of Live Dead from 1966 - Feb 1979
curious: why none at all? Why not just employ a script blocker? Youtube is obviously not malicious.
 

LucentShadow

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 28, 2011
936
2,436
Michigan, USA
'Just so you know, we appreciate logical & respectful challenges to our thinking (and any/all valid information that we may/not have known)! That's the only way our own knowledge base can increase and improve! So we appreciate your 'reasonable doubt' (it's not like we don't have some of our own)...and since we're all striving to get to the baseline-bottom-of-this without assumptions & errors, wethinks posts like yours are not only good, but essential.

Here's a few thoughts that may fit into the equation:

Firstly, wethinks it's safe to assume that the largest percentage of chemicals purchased from suppliers are labeled properly (except in rare/mistake situations)...and what mistakes there are, would be identified fairly quickly due to all the 'checkpoints' along the production line. Example: one barrel that's supposed to be full of diacetyl/similar is mistakenly labeled as cinnamon. Typically, the very first checkpoint in production (just opening the lid of the barrel) is going to alert an experienced mixer to the problem - and on it goes down the production/checkpoint line until the product is bottled and used. Another checkpoint is the end user...after a few complaints, the problem is traced back and identified.

We don't think it's possible that VR/FW has been dealing with 'that type' of a "raw material supplier' mistake for YEARS. FW has always made (for example) the 'most realistic butterscotch' (from hundreds of posts on ECF/internet), and it still is. They're using the same chemicals/formula they've always used (or there would have been a 'collective scream' from the vaping community).

So perhaps their 'raw material supplier' has been slipping/shipping them diacetyl for years, but labeling it 'something else buttery chemical blend'? With no acetyl propionyl? no acetoin? FW's Sarah already told Jonathon there were only 3 flavors with any of the 3 chemicals (in low percentages), but many of us layman can easily taste & smell the dangerous diketones in MANY of their flavors. Our point? ...and we layman are the first to recognize this?

If that's the case, then VR/FW's internal system of checks & balances; regular testing & record keeping is not only pitiful, it's irresponsible and dangerous. And that kind of inconsistency and inadequate testing is not capable of producing a line of flavors that's been consistent for years. Again, the vaping community/users would be all over the inconsistencies...virtually immediately.

So, let's assume the 'raw material supplier' has been slipping FW the mickey (wrong/mislabeled chemicals) - and they've been getting by with it for YEARS. An FDA agent knocks on the door of FW, and says: "There are tests that reveal you're using diacetyl, when you claim you are not, putting the health of thousands of vapers and workers at risk...let's see your purchase orders for the last 4 years. Well, golly-gee...even though it's tasteable, smellable, and test results reveal it - sho-nuf, you've never purchased any. Let's get in touch with the chemical company that's been lying, cheating & scamming you for years, and let them settle it. Whatever they say is 'evidence enough' for us. " ??? puhLEEZ, eh?

...

I'd like to clarify my thoughts on the matter. I don't think that most companies like Flavor West are actually manufacturing by mixing individually sourced, pure chemicals. That is a difficult and expensive endeavor, that would seem to be above such a company's 'pay grade'. I think that they manufacture blends of other pre-made blends of chemicals from flavor companies that are higher up the chain, such as these:

Flavor & Fragrance Industry - Top 10

Category:Flavor companies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I admit that I could be wrong, but it's hard to say, as secrecy is highly prized in such an industry. If they are using such 'flavors' from bigger companies, then they may not know what, exactly, is in their own flavor blends, as that is proprietary information protected by the business that is supplying them.

I've found a couple of the articles that have intrigued me in the past, about this subject. They both have interesting tidbits about this higher echelon of the industry:

How Flavor Chemists Make Your Food So Addictively Good

The Flavorists: Tweaking tastes and creating cravings - CBS News

It makes perfect sense to me that most smaller flavoring companies probably do not engineer their flavors absolutely from scratch, as that would essentially be reinventing the wheel. They probably source simple flavors from bigger companies who have already done the R&D, and put their own spin on them by blending different ones together. If so, then these 'raw materials' would actually be mixtures of dozens of chemicals, and protected as intellectual property.

They will probably never tell, though, so I suppose that it's our lot to speculate, and poke them with sticks when we get angry, in the hopes that they may spout out a truth, accidentally. ;)

Just to add another nugget of diacetyl-related info, it appears that one of these top flavoring companies had some grief over allegations of poor handling of the huge amounts that they use:

Sensient Technologies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ugh.
 

DeadbeatJeff

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Mar 6, 2014
1,273
949
Rochester, NY
store.coilsociety.com
I'd like to clarify my thoughts on the matter. I don't think that most companies like Flavor West are actually manufacturing by mixing individually sourced, pure chemicals. That is a difficult and expensive endeavor, that would seem to be above such a company's 'pay grade'. I think that they manufacture blends of other pre-made blends of chemicals from flavor companies that are higher up the chain, such as these:

Flavor & Fragrance Industry - Top 10

Category:Flavor companies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I admit that I could be wrong, but it's hard to say, as secrecy is highly prized in such an industry. If they are using such 'flavors' from bigger companies, then they may not know what, exactly, is in their own flavor blends, as that is proprietary information protected by the business that is supplying them.

I've found a couple of the articles that have intrigued me in the past, about this subject. They both have interesting tidbits about this higher echelon of the industry:

How Flavor Chemists Make Your Food So Addictively Good

The Flavorists: Tweaking tastes and creating cravings - CBS News

It makes perfect sense to me that most smaller flavoring companies probably do not engineer their flavors absolutely from scratch, as that would essentially be reinventing the wheel. They probably source simple flavors from bigger companies who have already done the R&D, and put their own spin on them by blending different ones together. If so, then these 'raw materials' would actually be mixtures of dozens of chemicals, and protected as intellectual property.

They will probably never tell, though, so I suppose that it's our lot to speculate, and poke them with sticks when we get angry, in the hopes that they may spout out a truth, accidentally. ;)

Just to add another nugget of diacetyl-related info, it appears that one of these top flavoring companies had some grief over allegations of poor handling of the huge amounts that they use:

Sensient Technologies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ugh.

moot point is moot

if they are taking traditional food flavoring and re-purposing it for vaping, specifically, then the onus is on them to ensure their products are safe, which they could do at the point of resource acquisition to determine which flavors they will actually use. This laize-fair attitude is unacceptable, as is the apparent complete disavowal of any responsibility.

Now you have numerous other, lesser, venders and juice-makers making claims based on FW's completely uninformed and negligent labeling of products that they have no idea the true make-up of. And that is the best case potential scenario for them, the worst being blatant lying and misinformation. For profit.

You wanna be a big boy, put on the big boy pants.
 
Last edited:

LucentShadow

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 28, 2011
936
2,436
Michigan, USA
moot point is moot

if they are taking traditional food flavoring and re-purposing it for vaping, specifically, then the onus is on them to ensure their products are safe, which they could do at the point of resource acquisition to determine which flavors they will actually use. This laize-fair attitude is unacceptable, as is the apparent complete disavowal of any responsibility.

Now you have numerous other, lesser, venders and juice-makers making claims based on FW's completely uninformed and negligent labeling of the products that they have no idea the true make-up of.

You wanna be a big bow, put on the big boy pants.

True, about the onus. I'm not trying to defend them, just pointing out that it may be more murky and difficult to get answers, than one might think.

The big boys have legal teams at their disposal, and the answers may lie with them.

I will say that there seems to be a pretty big shake-up here now, in our little corner, which is a good thing, IMO.
 

DeadbeatJeff

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Mar 6, 2014
1,273
949
Rochester, NY
store.coilsociety.com
True, about the onus. I'm not trying to defend them, just pointing out that it may be more murky and difficult to get answers, than one might think.

The big boys have legal teams at their disposal, and the answers may lie with them.

I will say that there seems to be a pretty big shake-up here now, in our little corner, which is a good thing, IMO.
Sure, but as is evidenced in this thread, testing for these chemicals is well within the means of a company like FW, regardless of... anything.
 

we2rcool

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 31, 2013
1,179
1,462
Iowa, IA, USA
I sold 2oz of each of my flavors to offset the costs.
I need a list of all the FW flavors containing Dikones(sp) above the FDA allowable limit.
I need my money back for all my FW flavors on that list then I need to visit MBV's wholesale site.

MBV stopped using FW for Butterscotch and a host of other flavors last October IIRC

We're not sure what people are talking about when they use the term "FDA allowable limit".

Diacetyl, acetyl propionyl and acetoin are ALL FDA approved under GRAS status (Generally Recognized As Safe), and to our knowledge there's no set "limit" (other than the natural one that comes from 'if you put too much in our butter/cream flavored 'xyz', we'll gag and never buy it again). However, in this thread it's been posted that FW posted the following on FB: ///The FDA does not require suppliers to disclose specific ingredients if the material falls under the maximum requirements. For Diatcetyl it is 1% and none of our products exceed this or our vendors would have this on the COA's they send us....

But we already know that a flavor with 1% diacetyl creates an ejuice that is hundreds/thousands of times higher than the REL!

So apparently this "FDA limit" is simply one of 'how much can be in there' before it has to be listed as an ingredient, and has absolutely nothing to do with 'safe exposure'.

NIOSH's REL (Recommended Exposure Limit), CDC - NIOSH Update - Diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione: NIOSH Seeks Comment On Draft Criteria Document 8-31 ppb (parts per billion). See underlined below - 2,3 pentanedione (acetyl propionyl) is no less dangerous than diacetyl. Acetyl propionyl is a common substitute for diacetyl - and many flavors that are "diacetyl free" are no less toxic than those containing diacetyl (because the manufacturers just inserted acetyl propionyl when they took out diacetyl). Acetoin is very 'chemically reactive compound' that converts to diacetyl in many conditions (it actually/gradually converts to diacetyl just be being in the air).

The juices (not flavoring concentrates) in this thread tested at 959,000ppb and 1,797,000ppb diacetyl, and one with 179,000ppb acetyl propionyl and 60,700ppb diacetyl. Even if the vapor from those juices is 100x less than that (as Theravape claims), the vapor would still be thousands of times over the recommended 'safe zone'.



For Diacetyl, a recommended exposure limit (REL) of 5 parts per billion (ppb) as an eight-hour, time-weighted average, (TWA) during a 40-hour work week. To further protect against effects of short-term exposures, NIOSH recommends in the draft document a short-term exposure limit (STEL) for diacetyl of 25 ppb for a 15-minute time period.

For 2,3-pentanedione, a recommended exposure limit (REL) of 9.3 parts per billion (ppb) as an eight-hour, time-weighted average, (TWA) during a 40-hour work week. The REL for 2,3-pentanedione in the draft document is based upon the lowest level at which the substance reliably can be detected using the existing analytical method, and should not be misconstrued to imply that 2,3-pentanedione is of lower toxicity than diacetyl. Further, NIOSH recommends a STEL of 31 ppb to limit peak exposures for 2,3-pentanedione on the same basis of analytic method limitation.

Vape Safe!
 

we2rcool

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 31, 2013
1,179
1,462
Iowa, IA, USA
They need to list it as included not diactyl free(!) if it's 1%

That's what I need a list of.
I probably have a dozen or more that I bought as D Free! that are over the limit.

thanks

Even .0000001% is "over the limit" if it's labeled "diacetyl free".

If we had a list, we'd certainly share it. Not having a list (because manufacturers, vendors and mixers do NOT disclose the ingredients) is the whole point of this thread.

None of us have the simple information we need to be able to make an informed choice.

And it's not just FW.

FA is the ONLY vendor that makes a line specifically for vapers that is totally free of these chemicals. TFA tests & discloses the percentages in their flavors. Since these chemicals are GRAS for ingestion, and since the flavors are sold as "food flavors", any & all brands are suspect.
 

smelly

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 30, 2013
201
161
41
Central, FL USA
I've traded some emails with Flavourart this morning. Wanted to personally confirm their status. Response so far is all flavors under their vape section are diacetyl and acetyl propionyl free. Acetoin however is there. Waiting for confirmation on which ones contain acetoin. I need to order a bunch of flavors today so I sure hope they answer the question soon.

Anyone already have this info?
 

vangrl27

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2013
280
339
vancouver
This is a phone conversation that someone from the Canadian Forum had with Linda from TFA. Thought I'd post it to try to somewhat clarify how they operate.

"Ok, Here it is:

TFA only sources from USA manufacturers that are regulated by the FDA to only produce food grade flavorings. However, the manufacturers do not need to provide a CofA to the flavor broker which in this case is TFA.

Now, once TFA receives the outsourced product from their vendor they put the liquid through their own gas chromatograph to produce their own analysis of the product and they post own their website. such as the following:

http://shop.perfumersapprentice.com/..._search=348715

and then if you want to check your specific batch number, for example I'll use my Key Lime flavor with a batch# of 162002

Perfumer's Apprentice

and those analysis are available for all batches.

A very, very nice lady that was very upfront about everything I asked. She also said I can't tell you what specific ingredients that are known to be safe are going to do to your lungs in 20 years but that they take every measure possible to be up front about ingredients that could possibly harm us. She also said if you still aren't sure then either do more research or stop using the particular product.

It was a 15 minute conversation, I did read her the FB Flavor West screen shot and she was very surprised by the remark but would'nt comment further as she wasn't there and didn't want to get into the middle


edit: crap....she WAS very up front. WAS not wasn’t

She didn't tell me who it was but she did say that one of the flavor companies that we may or may not be familiar with sources their flavors in powder form from China and then mixes it like you would powdered OJ. plot thickens "
 

smelly

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 30, 2013
201
161
41
Central, FL USA
Pure speculation but FW has always had that China powdered taste to me. I work at a flavor manufacturer/seller and see/smell a lot of weird stuff. I'll go ahead and say it, my first FW order was my last. They need a huge overhaul. Candy flavors is another one. Enough bashing for now :). Kudos to TFA. Linda is one of the nicest/best most transparent customer service reps I've dealt with. Good people right there.

And so far Flavourart is also top notch. Confirmed coffee, pistachio, wine (red and white) and chestnut contain acetoin. How their custard doesn't fall on this list?... Hmmm...
 

vangrl27

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2013
280
339
vancouver
"And so far Flavourart is also top notch. Confirmed coffee, pistachio, wine (red and white) and chestnut contain acetoin. How their custard doesn't fall on this list?... Hmmm..."

the only one of those that i see in their e-cig line is the red & white wine. If there is acetoin in that flavour then they should remove it from that line.
 

Mowgli

Runs with scissors
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 25, 2013
8,723
36,953
Taxachusetts
curious: why none at all? Why not just employ a script blocker? Youtube is obviously not malicious.

Flash forces non-stoppable movement on web pages.
I use "copy address", paste into ecf, preview post to watch some flash movies.
ECF employs something that allows some flash movies to play here on non-flash puters but it doesn't always work.

On topic - I'm extra ...... because I like almost all of the 50+ FW flavors I've tried.
I like it even more because Jason told me they're designed to work at the same concentration %
I mix mine at 12.5% in 70/30 & 15% in 50/50 and almost all of them are good right there.
I like simple things that work right.
....!
 
Last edited:

DeadbeatJeff

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Mar 6, 2014
1,273
949
Rochester, NY
store.coilsociety.com
Flash forces non-stoppable movement on web pages.
I use "copy address", paste into ecf, preview post to watch some flash movies.
ECF employs something that allows some flash movies to play here on non-flash puters but it doesn't always work.

On topic - I'm extra ...... because I like almost all of the 50+ FW flavors I've tried.
I like it even more because Jason told me they're designed to work at the same concentration %
I mix mine at 12.5% in 70/30 & 15% in 50/50 and almost all of them are good right there.
I like simple things that work right.
....!

look into NoScript, an addon for FF and Chrome. Stops all script, java, flash, or other, unless you allow the domain from which they originate.
 

DeadbeatJeff

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Mar 6, 2014
1,273
949
Rochester, NY
store.coilsociety.com
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread