Smokers outnumber any potential number of vapers we could have and it did them little good. Prepare for apocalypse and pray for Nirvana.
Smokers outnumber any potential number of vapers we could have and it did them little good. Prepare for apocalypse and pray for Nirvana.
You assume that they care that there is a difference. They want it the same for headline purposes and votes. Showing the ignorant sheople that they care about protecting the children and the voting constituents.
I think we need to get the public to understand that nicotine by itself is not all that much different than caffeine.The biggest battle to me is separate vaping from smoking. Second leg would be what I mentioned earlier, get people to see the science and logic (yeah that second leg could be used to accomplish the first but I'm referring to reinforcing the harm reduction).
This makes sense to me.I'm cautiously optimistic.
The law is being passed in the EU very soon... But whether we win or not, it won't come into effect until 2016.
Vaping has doubled or tripled every year since it was first marketed. That means that by 2016, we will have four to six times the traction that we have now. Decent scientific studies are now answering the questions that need to be asked: what's in the vapour, is it harmful, can it aid smoking cessation.
[Snippity snip.]
. . . The only way BP can stop it is to replicate it.
If by "they" you mean the extremists you are right, they do not nor will they ever care about the difference. If by "they" you mean the general population, you are wrong. My parents hate smoking but they are okay with vaping since I explained the difference, to the point I can vape in their house. I believe my parents are in the majority of the population that doesn't like smoking. Demonstrating the extremists are the minority will fall in place if we successfully separate vaping from smoking in the eyes of the majority. Just look at the battle with other stuff exemplified by Oregon and Colorado.
I was thinking of pulling together a packet of information, not only about e-cigs, but about all the money connections behind the scenes and sending to media outlets to try to get one of them to cover this story.
Just out of curiosity, I found this page What should we investigate? - News | NBC News
"We're about investigative reporting on topics that matter: corruption, conflicts of interest, broken systems, abuses by institutions and individuals with power, whether that's government, nonprofits, or the press itself."
I would imagine that most news outlets want the same thing, and our story certainly seems to have all the elements.
There are links to upload information and then contact information for them to follow up. I don't feel informed/expert enough to field any follow up details.
Maybe we need a Media/PR director in CASAA?
In addition to getting our story out for free using these types of outlets, maybe a crowd funding effort to pay for advertising?
While I agree with this, I have a big problem with it being the outcome.This makes sense to me.
What I see happening is what happened in so many areas - that is, ginormous corporate interests see a potential source of profit, and try mightily to coopt the vitality of pioneers. They end up cheapening and mass producing the original spirit of the thing, but generate massive profit for themselves in the process. Meanwhile, a tiny subculture market remains, populated by committed (some might say obsessive!) hobbyists or collectors or fans.
You see this in everything from music to fashion to modified motorcycles, and I think this will happen to ecigs, too. There's simply too much potential profit in this for it to be quashed entirely.
Having fought in a war, I would call this a confrontation at best. For vapers it is not going to go back 30 years where you could smoke anywhere you wanted. We will end up following the same rules as there are for tobacco. If you quit smoking and used vaping to do so then you won your own war.
If that's the case, then maybe we should be very concerned about the increasing absurdity of the spreading smoking bans...This is how it will play out. The fantasy of vaping anywhere and everywhere is just that- a fantasy. Not in this country...
While I agree with this, I have a big problem with it being the outcome.
There are millions and millions of smokers still out there...
And in this scenario, the chances of them making the switch start going down instead of up.
![]()
If that's the case, then maybe we should be very concerned about the increasing absurdity of the spreading smoking bans.
Public beaches? Public parks? In your own car with a child present? Public housing? Anywhere on a college campus? Entire football stadiums? What's next?
When you figure out where to go, please let me know.In my case, exodus is the final solution...
When you figure out where to go, please let me know.
Although, knowing you, my guess would be Czechoslovakia?
![]()