While I can't be sure, I'd image that they substituted it. It doesn't seem like they would have very good buttery flavors without a buttery flavoring.
I don't think acetoin would be a good alternative CDC testing of AcetoinThe boiling point of PG and VG are much higher, so it wouldn't work.
Acetoin, delta-tetradecalactone, and ethyl lactate.
Travis. Other substitutes have been mentioned, which is why we're for disclosure of all ingredients so we can decide for ourselves.
Travis. Other substitutes have been mentioned, which is why we're for disclosure of all ingredients so we can decide for ourselves.
i just found that Acetoin, which turns into diacetyl, and 2,3 pentanadione, which is as bad as diacetyl are both in cigarettes too, so vape your brains out. I'd like to see it removed but I don't think it really matters any more. It's a moot point to me, I still feel vaping is wayyyy safer than smoking.
i just found that Acetoin, which turns into diacetyl, and 2,3 pentanadione, which is as bad as diacetyl are both in cigarettes too, so vape your brains out. I'd like to see it removed but I don't think it really matters any more. It's a moot point to me, I still feel vaping is wayyyy safer than smoking.
I agree.There is a clear and demonstrable danger from small/unprotected Li-ion batteries. Some buyers of mods don't know that, and some sellers of mods don't tell their customers. So it's comparatively easy for ECF to publicize the issue. It may create a debate about the finer points but the job gets done.
There are implied dangers from some chemical flavorings, but there are some problems:
1. No one has been hurt yet.
2. The only way to know if those constituents are in the mix is a lab test.
3. Lab testing is expensive.
Because none of the suppliers popular with the community test their product, there is no real market advantage to any supplier by stating "Our product is XXX-free", some buyers believe it and some don't. But as soon as a couple of suppliers lab test their e-liquid and then advertise it as contaminant-free, it will give them a marketing advantage, since most e-cig users are health-conscious or they wouldn't be here. That will force others to do the same.
At that point there will be a benefit to buyers as the actual quality, as opposed to the advertised quality, will be improved.
So as you can imagine I am fairly keen that a supplier starts the ball rolling. The first one to kick it off will get plenty of publicity, and they will deserve it.
There is a clear and demonstrable danger from small/unprotected Li-ion batteries. Some buyers of mods don't know that, and some sellers of mods don't tell their customers. So it's comparatively easy for ECF to publicize the issue. It may create a debate about the finer points but the job gets done.
There are implied dangers from some chemical flavorings, but there are some problems:
1. No one has been hurt yet.
2. The only way to know if those constituents are in the mix is a lab test.
3. Lab testing is expensive.
Because none of the suppliers popular with the community test their product, there is no real market advantage to any supplier by stating "Our product is XXX-free", some buyers believe it and some don't. But as soon as a couple of suppliers lab test their e-liquid and then advertise it as contaminant-free, it will give them a marketing advantage, since most e-cig users are health-conscious or they wouldn't be here. That will force others to do the same.
At that point there will be a benefit to buyers as the actual quality, as opposed to the advertised quality, will be improved.
So as you can imagine I am fairly keen that a supplier starts the ball rolling. The first one to kick it off will get plenty of publicity, and they will deserve it.
Keep reading.
i just found that Acetoin, which turns into diacetyl, and 2,3 pentanadione, which is as bad as diacetyl are both in cigarettes too, so vape your brains out. I'd like to see it removed but I don't think it really matters any more. It's a moot point to me, I still feel vaping is wayyyy safer than smoking.