one can not sue anyone for anything, there have to be merits to the case.
regards
mike
Hi, Mike.
I don't want to stray into a semantic argument here. You actually can file a civil lawsuit for anything, as long as you can get a lawyer to file the suit for you.
It's what happens next that's the key point. The court won't just look at the filing and toss it out. They will notify the defendant, who then needs to respond (or get a default judgment against him). So suppose the defendant asks for the case to be thrown out without merit. The plaintiff is then entitled to subpoena witnesses for depositions, subpoena for additional documentation, etc. etc. Then there can be arguments before the court about procedure, etc, etc. All of these put a financial burden on the defendant. All this happens even before the first opportunity for the case to be dismissed. And even for a case which is considered to be complete BS by the general population, the outcome is never guaranteed. This kind of stuff is the "hammer" that some lawyers will gladly wield against the plaintiff, and it does often work to coerce them into a settlement.
its totally true. it differs from state to state but there are rules
governing the courts in whats allowable and what is not.
lawyers turn down legitimate cases every day because the
merits of the case are not provable.
regards
mike
Yes, it is true that lawyers often will turn down cases they consider to be unwinnable, or even more so, frivolous. But it depends on the case. Slip and fall on a sidewalk? Boring; if there isn't really good justification, most lawyers would pass.
The lawyer prosecuting this suit is pretty much guaranteed press coverage, in the papers and on the nightly news. Gets his face and name in front of the public (free advertising). Pushes his "reputation" of helping the little guy against corporations who endanger infants. Great stuff! If the plaintiff settles, he can boast about his win. If he loses, he can air his views on the evening news about how the court system really failed to protect the children, and favored the "corporate interests" instead. Great stuff for an ambulance chaser! And I've never heard of a case where the lawyer was liable for monetary damages, even in the case of a suit that got tossed right out by the courts. So he's got a ton to gain, and really nothing to lose except his time.
The reality is that there are lawsuits against which it is financially impossible to defend yourself. The costs of winning, even in the best case, can easily be much much more than the cost of settling, never mind the risk of either a protracted case, or even an outright loss.