Sorry, but I disagree.
Cigarettes have been designed over decades with SPECIFIC chemicals and additives to KEEP THE USER ADDICTED.
Once hooked, regardless of "intellect", most people no longer have a desire or "choice" to quit.
Do the research, including laboratory trials of cigarette addicted primates and other animals. Including laboratory trials of mice that when given the choice between food or smoke, starved themselves rather than give up sucking on tubes filled with cigarette smoke.
I do not believe those starving mice were just trying to "look cool".
DO THE RESEARCH!
How about you cite the research whereby you believe specific chemicals and additives are put in to keep the user addicted. I STRONGLY believe you will be citing ANTZ sources that amount to hit pieces against smoking and/or BT. The SAME type of stuff we see with eCigs. But here on a vaping forum, we do all we can to downplay that sort of reporting, seeing it as ANTZ propaganda. So, when ANTZ speaks out against BT/combustibles, we are right on board with them and their 'science.' But when they do the same with eCigs, we dispute their findings calling them not believable, and having an agenda.
I entered this thread as dual user, and noted that in my first reply. But inevitably, these type of threads turn to hating on cigs from what looks an awful lot like ANTZ rhetoric, which is clearly ingrained in our culture. So, I say cite your research, and then let's look at what those SAME sources have to say about eCigs and let's all decide on how credible we truly believe they are OR are we actually dealing with ANTZ propaganda.
Not only is my experience with smoking one where I was very much addicted, but I was able to go cold turkey. Once, that was relatively easy, twice it was challenging, but doable. I do believe quitting, as in initial decision to stop smoking regularly is a matter of willpower. And then the desire to stay quit is a matter of choice with willpower. As a current dual user, and with my previous experience of quitting, cold turkey, I know I can stop at any time. I choose not to. Or closer to, I choose not to stay quit. As I vape (nicotine), the willpower to stop is replaced with ability to fulfill much of what I get from smoking by way of vaping. I believe (don't really know for sure) that most vapers, now ex-smokers, experience similar thing. But, difference between me and them is they desire to stay quit. I'm now on day 3 or 5 (not sure) of not smoking. I'm very okay with myself having another smoke at some future date, and may be today. An ex-smoker who hates what smoking has done to them, their family and sees BT as evil is not okay with idea of having another smoke. But, I continue to believe, quite strongly, that if you had such an easy time transitioning from abusive smoker to daily vaper, then one smoke (or even one pack) wouldn't send you right back to place of abusive smoking, UNLESS you made personal decision of stopping vaping. Do them both, and you will likely prefer vaping and thus will not become heavy abusive smoker, as was the case before vaping came along.
Part of the reason why I choose not to stay quit is because I do take pleasure in moderate smoking. The ability to have a smoke and not crave it. That is relatively new to me, and not something that is brought up as possible with smoking. Seems it is either you smoke and risk become heavy addict, or you don't smoke. Even smokers seem to buy into this black and white approach to smoking, swearing that one smoke for them today would mean they would be abusive smoker. And then adding to that, it is because of what BT puts into smokes as to why that would happen, not their choice, and nothing to do with willpower.
I strongly disagree with that take, and enjoy having that discussion as I see it hugely related to the politics around vaping and what is at heart of FSPTCA.