Nothing makes kids want something more than telling them they cannot have it
Nothing makes kids want something more than telling them they cannot have it
Hempfest 2009
Seattle (KING COUNTY) Washington
King County hosts Hempfest every year
but bans E-cigarettes to protect the children
I sent Ken Schram an email about the form letters folks have been receiving from Patterson with a link to the thread on "infuriating response." I also asked him to consider awarding a Schrammie to the FDA.
NICE... Would love to see that video!
That video would make Ken FAMOUS...
Might also make him unemployed.
Ken is a already famous here in the Seattle area for his opinions on many things, He won't lose his job here that's for sure. I am glad he's come down on the side of sanity on this issue. I don't agree with many of his crusades, but as they say my enemy's enemy is my friend today.![]()
I just got the exact same exact message from Julia in response to my Testimony from last week.
Thanks,
Jeff~
P.S. I see she came up with the part about the "unregulated, black market e-cigarette products" what is that about?
Unfortunately, the zealots no longer care about "saving smokers."
They only care about "saving the children" from the "evils of addiction."
It doesn't even matter if the addiction is smokeless and has no worse
health risks than the caffeinate soda to which they are already addicted.
kristin
Here was my reply,
That was my point. You disregard all the data that supports the facts in this case that there is indeed no harmful chemicals being exhaled for some guys opinion to achieve your personal goals and further send people that quit smoking right back into a harmful environment they were fortunate enough to get out of and you call that good for the people? I applaud your ban to keep the children from buying them but not sending innocent citizens back into the lions den. Nancy Peloski also had your not care about the people attitude and they got rid of her. I can only hope the good people of King Co. have the same affect on your personal agenda.
It's like rationalizing with a 2 year old on why she can't
have M & M's for dinner. You can give her all of the
logical, reasonable explanations and she still says,
"M & Ms!" and refuses to eat her dinner!
kristin
It is a widely believed myth that e-cigarettes are targeted at youth and/or that the products are only used to "circumvent anti-smoking laws." Before enacting legislation, however, a conscientious politician should verify the facts.
It is difficult to believe that any member of the board of health came any closer than 100 feet of an e-cigarette in use. Anyone with a working sense of smell can discriminate between tobacco smoke and vapor. Smoke has a distinctive odor, both during and after use. In Virginia, where the Attorney General ruled that e-cigarettes are not included in the indoor smoking ban, there has been zero confusion. No smokers have lit up indoors because they saw an e-cigarette in use. In fact, what usually happens is that the smoker, who would prefer to stay inside where the climate is controlled, asks about the product and subsequently begins to consider making a switch to a much safer product.
The survey of e-cigarette consumers conducted by the Tobacco Harm Reduction organization found that "All respondents previously smoked and 91% had attempted to stop smoking before trying ecigarettes. About half (55%) were 31-50, while 32% were >50 years old. Most (79%) of the respondents had been using e-cigarettes for <6 months and reported using them as a complete (79%) or partial (17%) replacement for, rather than in addition to (4%), cigarettes."
So if 87% are older than 31 years, and 91% had attempted to stop smoking (65% tried more than 4 times to do so), the facts say that the target market is not young non-smokers. The target market is older people who smoked for decades and had difficulty stopping.
Article available: http://tobaccoharmreduction.org/wpapers/011v1.pdf
Julia Patterson claims that “The Board of Health’s responsibility is to create policies that foster the health and well being of our community, and today’s action will help achieve that objective." FDA-approved smoking cessation products have an abysmal success rate--7% at 6 months, 5% at 1 year, dropping to a mere 2% at 20 months.
If 79% of e-cigarette consumers have completely switched from inhaling deadly tobacco smoke to vapor that contains no tar, no carbon monoxide, no particulates, and none of the 4,000 chemicals created by the process of combustion, how is it in the best interests of public health to discourage use of the products? Banishing former smokers to the smoking section hardly seems to be in the best interests of their health. Such banishment also removes a powerful incentive for smokers to switch to a healthier life-style.