This discussion would be much more productive if we stuck to reality as opposed to idealism.
There is a phrase in French that translates to "It doesn't matter if you like it or not"...that I find wholly applicable here.
Asking questions like 'why should e-Cigs be singled out' is a wrong question, simply because e-Cigs are perceptually at this time close enough to tobacco ones that they are a "problem" in a general societal view.
Trying to deal with this perception requires an *initial capitulation* to this social construct. It just does.
It doesn't matter if the facts or figures say this or that *at this time*...there is such a thing as winning the battle and losing the war...as well as spreading your forces too thin to even fight the battle.
What is the core goal we are after here? We want to be able to use our devices, to buy them and sell them freely.
This will not happen with a massive assault against *every established institution and social belief*...history proves this to us time and time again.
You can not depose a system with a small force; you can corrupt it and grow your forces. To survive you must *acknowledge* the, for want of a better word, status quo and your place in it or you will be squashed into oblivion.
Attacking non-smokers, smokers, ASH, the FDA, BT, BP, Fascists, the MSM and everyone else at the same time leaves us with no allies whatsoever.
You want to get more allies? Don't try to tear down all of their institutions...they are protected and they WILL protect them.
The doorway is education and the key to that lock is acknowledging the fact that the lock is there and the perceived legitimacy thereof and *its* right to exist.
In other words...use simple tools of flattery and psychology. Make them fight for you, not against you.
Trying to get "innocent people" "hooked" on e-Cigs is a sure as hell way to bring down the proverbial ban hammer from every direction.
Can we please, please just walk away from this and let reason and current reality be our compass here?
-K
There is a phrase in French that translates to "It doesn't matter if you like it or not"...that I find wholly applicable here.
Asking questions like 'why should e-Cigs be singled out' is a wrong question, simply because e-Cigs are perceptually at this time close enough to tobacco ones that they are a "problem" in a general societal view.
Trying to deal with this perception requires an *initial capitulation* to this social construct. It just does.
It doesn't matter if the facts or figures say this or that *at this time*...there is such a thing as winning the battle and losing the war...as well as spreading your forces too thin to even fight the battle.
What is the core goal we are after here? We want to be able to use our devices, to buy them and sell them freely.
This will not happen with a massive assault against *every established institution and social belief*...history proves this to us time and time again.
You can not depose a system with a small force; you can corrupt it and grow your forces. To survive you must *acknowledge* the, for want of a better word, status quo and your place in it or you will be squashed into oblivion.
Attacking non-smokers, smokers, ASH, the FDA, BT, BP, Fascists, the MSM and everyone else at the same time leaves us with no allies whatsoever.
You want to get more allies? Don't try to tear down all of their institutions...they are protected and they WILL protect them.
The doorway is education and the key to that lock is acknowledging the fact that the lock is there and the perceived legitimacy thereof and *its* right to exist.
In other words...use simple tools of flattery and psychology. Make them fight for you, not against you.
Trying to get "innocent people" "hooked" on e-Cigs is a sure as hell way to bring down the proverbial ban hammer from every direction.
Can we please, please just walk away from this and let reason and current reality be our compass here?
-K