Just to clarify, UC its not radio waves it's sound waves that we can't hear, radio waves are what microwaves make for example
"Champagne"
I tried it and it does nothing, possibly because:
- the bottle was mislabeled (smells like vanilla to me)
- there is a secret method to using it
Mine is Lorann Champagne, is supposed to smell very sweet and sort of like vanilla flavouring?
---
(UC) Indeed we can't hear it but I bet the dogs wonder what in carnations is going on!![]()
I still use my US cleaner all the time for steeping, but mine is heated. It's also very useful for prepping or cleaning ceramic wicks (which I prefer) and also cleaning up new/crudded up atties. They are handy for all types of vape-ralated tasks....even cleaning jewelry.
That being said - I wouldn't spend a lot of money on a new one - you can find used US cleaners pretty cheaply. I got mine in a trade from a Dentist who was retiring, but there are many Laboratory surplus places around that have them for very reasonable prices if you look around.
Whatever floats your boat....
Not at all. It does work.
Blending and heat are both nessessary. Blending comes from the cavitation of the radio waves. Heat is produced by this cavitation. So this method is efficent. I think your argument is in the cost of investment with your argument being why spend all this money when you can simply heat and shake. This may be a valid argument but I found heating and shaking does not do the job as quickly as a UC. I did the thurmos cup heating and shaking and found the mix still needed a week or 2 to mature.
I haven't noticed that happening to my juices.
I am referring to keeping the juice and water bath at a constant 150° for four hours. There is a remarkable difference in results than a hot cup drop in.
You can convince yourself all you like that cavitation matters, and if it works for you thats good. Its a good method, my point indeed is that its simply absolutely positively not necessary.
A mini crock pot heats at 150° and takes up almost no space at all. it is that level of heat that works. i had seen a test someplace that confirmed my results awhile back. ill see if I can find it.
Here: http://www.reddit.com/r/electronic_cigarette/comments/1ep7ym/
Final result. Consistant heat is all that it necessary. His testing was 8 hours at ~160° I believe. For myself and the progression of my juice taste wise I prefer 4 hours. But the graphs dont lie.
If that's true, I'll stick with using a UC and temperature control as the majority of DIY'ers here have been doing, and getting awesome results with. Heating Nic above 120 degrees is not a good idea. Unless I missed something and you're talking about 0nic juice.
Sent from the hand not holding my itazte using Tapatalk
At 120-130 degrees, the chemical compounds in nic begin to break down.
...electrolysis / electrolytic action?
Saline you mean? Interesting.
For me the cons outweigh the pros at this point. I detected no boost in smoothness, and the effect of flavor seemed minimal.
Regarding saline, interesting how my first mix using it strips the gunk off my coils and wicks, which then leaches back down into tank, making it cloudy and looking very disgusting. I'm not sure if I like that or not.
I haven't noticed that happening to my juices.