I don't believe it because I read it on the internet. In fact, my point is, I can't find it to read on the internet. Please cite something, anything, to support your 3rd sentence. That's my point- we've all taken it for granted that it's proven that nicotine is addictive, because we've heard it for decades. But EVERYTHING everyone cites relates to nicotine delivered via tobacco combustion. After reading about potential health benefits of nicotine a while back, I started looking a while back for anything that supports your statement, but simply can't find it. And lets forget the illness and other negative effects - that's not what I'm talking about. Show me anything that shows nicotine without tobacco combustion is addictive at all, much less highly addictive. I'm not being combative, Eskie - I'd really like to see and know, rather than taking it as a given.