But perhaps certain products to a few of us are so obvious that one will work better than the other. Example you can't really compare 901 against pen style as the pen always will outperform 901 that's obvious to any fool that as experienced both units. Which I have and many friends of mine have.
thats the problem ned.. there are at least a couple of "fools" here who would say otherwise..
i would and so would darcy if he dare speak up.. i have a pair of both types in front of me now.. whats obvious to one fool dont seem the same as what obvious to another fool..
now either u are correct ned or i am correct ned.. we both cant be correct and until its decided which of us is correct total confusion will continue to reign.. i hate total confusion and would like to get rid of it and arrive at some facts..
so ned which one of us is correct.. are u taking rubbish or am i talking rubbish.. one of us needs to be proved wrong even if that one dosnt like it..
i am about to produce a decent (not look like a real cig) e smoking device with a battery thats big enough to work..
i still havnt decided which atomizer to fit it with.. a 901 or a classic.. both have their good and bad points.. the classic will look nicer and has bigger carts.. the 901 works better and has the smaller cart but wont look quite as nice..
but ned.. u are telling me i have all this wrong.. odd isnt it..
trog
ps.. no probs kit i am simply trying to arrive at some e smoking facts.. all this "subjective" conjecture is doing my head in and of no use to anybody.. i dont realy dispute what u say about the bling.. i do dispute what u said about the 901 tho.. i did try bling liquid in a 901 by the way.. and a pipe.. u havnt..
Last edited: