Evolv DNA 75

Status
Not open for further replies.

BillW50

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 23, 2014
3,429
34,381
US
But heatvape hybrid connector cap do give me problems at times when my tank got screwed in too tight, it is very difficult to remove and twice I unscrewed the deck instead...you know how the rest of the story goes.
Yes that could be a problem, but I have eight Invader Mini mods. I always like screwing on the top cap to the atty first (I think this is easier on those chrome plated brass threads). And when you screw both on the mod and it stops. I only tighten a tad more by the top cap only. And I have always been able to get everything loose once again and you get a really solid 510 connection.
 

Akuma888

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 30, 2015
246
159
Yes that could be a problem, but I have eight Invader Mini mods. I always like screwing on the top cap to the atty first (I think this is easier on those chrome plated brass threads). And when you screw both on the mod and it stops. I only tighten a tad more by the top cap only. And I have always been able to get everything loose once again and you get a really solid 510 connection.

Yes that's what I did too but you know as the top cap is glossy all the way through the knurling, it just kinda difficult for my sausage butter fingers to get as good grip on it.

Do you screw the top cap fully and tightly to the tank, or you screw it in like 3/4 and screw the rest into the mod?

But I do love the Heatvape Mini, the chip is as good as DNA. However I only have one and it was a gift to me.
 

BillW50

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 23, 2014
3,429
34,381
US
Yes that's what I did too but you know as the top cap is glossy all the way through the knurling, it just kinda difficult for my sausage butter fingers to get as good grip on it.

Do you screw the top cap fully and tightly to the tank, or you screw it in like 3/4 and screw the rest into the mod?

But I do love the Heatvape Mini, the chip is as good as DNA. However I only have one and it was a gift to me.
Yes that is the idea with the top cap. You can't get a good grip on it, but that is okay since you can't get it really tight to make things difficult to get apart. It doesn't need to be any tighter anyway.

I screw the top cap on the atty until it stops. As long as it isn't any tighter that you can loosen with two fingers. And yes, I too love that chip, it works virtually identical to a small screen DNA40.
 

Tpat591

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2014
2,728
9,711
RB nj
From what I hear they were pretty ....... Evolv was there as well and they didn't bring any info on the 75W. Kind of gives you an idea of their frustration level hahahaha
Evolv was there? Surprised they didn't make HCigar put away the flyers before the place opened to keep things under wraps.
 

Tpat591

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2014
2,728
9,711
RB nj
Some are now saying it was posted on a DNA200 Facebook group that the DNA75 will not only handle single 18650s but also has a 2S mode. Strange they would call it a DNA75 & not a DNA133 if this had any merit.

It would make a lot of sense to design the board in that manner though from a versatility standpoint and Evolv certainly has proven in the past that they do take these types of operating parameters into consideration in their designs. It certainly would be the right way to go.

I just wish they would have introduced a larger screen option as well that has ability to put more information fields on the display and possibly a menu driven GUI.
 

retird

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 31, 2010
5,133
5,862
North Side
Some are now saying it was posted on a DNA200 Facebook group that the DNA75 will not only handle single 18650s but also has a 2S mode. Strange they would call it a DNA75 & not a DNA133 if this had any merit.

It would make a lot of sense to design the board in that manner though from a versatility standpoint and Evolv certainly has proven in the past that they do take these types of operating parameters into consideration in their designs. It certainly would be the right way to go.

I just wish they would have introduced a larger screen option as well that has ability to put more information fields on the display and possibly a menu driven GUI.

The DNA 200 already can use 2 cells @ 133 watts. Will be interesting to see what the DNA75 will do and what functionality is comes with. Lots of rumors flying around....
 
  • Like
Reactions: fishwater

Tpat591

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2014
2,728
9,711
RB nj
2 cells would be in parallel, my guess.
My thought as well. Info coming second handed out of a Facebook DNA 200 owners group I don't have access to so I can't point to any posts. Two or three places people are talking about it & info is coming from that forum.

Video said board is same size as DNA200 just with a bit less components so maybe they left enough buck in it to handle a 2S. Still think it would be released as a 133w if they did.
 
Last edited:

jstrong

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 7, 2014
849
862
Virginia
Well this is good news. I was hoping that Yihi would revive the SX350 to a 75ish with TC. Ive gotten a few dna40 boards lately and mods, they have been a joy to use so I do not mind Evolv is doing it before Yihi does.
Kinda confused here. I have read your post a few times. You do know Yihi had a 75 watt TC device a year ago with the SX Mini M Class and the latest SX Mini ML class.
 

Tpat591

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2014
2,728
9,711
RB nj
upload_2016-3-20_14-31-46.png
 

MikeyConti

VapeBro
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 22, 2014
3,885
17,524
35
South Carolina
I would love to have a DNA75 Single 18650 mod for low wattage use but still have the functionality of the DNA200 programmable wise with Escribe!!

Would be nice if Evolv would integrate compatibility with Bluetooth or an RF Chip to use with Escribe. I'm sure this has been brought up a Million times though. I'm new to the DNA Game.. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread