if so theres something seriously wrong with your cuboid...perhaps a circuit problem internally or a bad contact ...twice the battery HAS to last twice as long under the same loadsMy vape doesn't change. It's what's in the signiture area below. The cuboid ran no longer than the mini in my test according to the puff timer. I'm thinking I'll do the test again and report the results again. It will take a few days to do that after I start the test. I'll report the results here.
I would agreeif so theres something seriously wrong with your cuboid...perhaps a circuit problem internally or a bad contact ...twice the battery HAS to last twice as long under the same loads
I would suggest metering the batts as a quick comparison after a days use
They said they were testing it now but didn't release any info on it, or they said they were looking forward to it? Didn't see the vid you are talking about.Apparently the guys from plumes of hazard are beta testers for the DNA75, unfortunately they didn't really say anything on their show.
They had beta units, but didn't want to give out any information because it is very early in beta testing and a lot can change between now and when the board is released.They said they were testing it now but didn't release any info on it, or they said they were looking forward to it? Didn't see the vid you are talking about.
Life is rarely ideal. I'd settle for the 40 getting reprogrammed for a TCR adjustment & maybe be bumped up to 50-60w as I just don't see enough real estate on a 40 to allow Escribe use. Maybe they could do an escribe daughter board connected with ribbon cables & zifs could be set up for the 40, but why bother. Smaller mods would have trouble fitting it so it would be an expensive design & implementation with a very limited market.In an ideal situation for me I would like to see this 75w board have the same footprint as the dna40 so I could upgrade a few dust collectors I used to enjoy.
Yeah I know it is doubtful but it would be great to upgrade some mods I used to really enjoy.Life is rarely ideal. I'd settle for the 40 getting reprogrammed for a TCR adjustment & maybe be bumped up to 50-60w as I just don't see enough real estate on a 40 to allow Escribe use. Maybe they could do an escribe daughter board connected with ribbon cables & zifs could be set up for the 40, but why bother. Smaller mods would have trouble fitting it so it would be an expensive design & implementation with a very limited market.
Escribe capabilities don't take up room on the board except a USB connector; other than that its functionality is all in the MCU.Life is rarely ideal. I'd settle for the 40 getting reprogrammed for a TCR adjustment & maybe be bumped up to 50-60w as I just don't see enough real estate on a 40 to allow Escribe use. Maybe they could do an escribe daughter board connected with ribbon cables & zifs could be set up for the 40, but why bother. Smaller mods would have trouble fitting it so it would be an expensive design & implementation with a very limited market.
I calculate the DNA75 pcb dimensions.
In my mind.
From DNA200 I removed the charger, JST connector, one power stage, and the charger step-up.
I added a chip for 1 cell charger, a battery monitor, and an input current monitor (maybe in the same ic).
The result is a pcb about 52mm length.
Plus the 510 connector, total length about 65mm.
Equal to 18650 battery.
Same functionality (EScribe), one battery, step-up/down.
I don't know about Evolv's DNA75, but my mind's DNA75 is awesome!!!![]()
On efuntop the listing for the Hcigar VT75w lists that it is compatible with Escribe.the thing i'm most concerned about is the size of the board... my plan is to put one in my 40w Shark Flask! well, providing it has escribe aswell. and, that's not confirmed yet![]()
Ah.........Tacos!It is likely the exact same size as the 200, based on using existing materials and processes.