You are going to have to be more specific Steve instead of making more vague accusations. I have kept up on the calls to action and I have seen none of the sensationalism you are accusing CASAA of doing. You need to give specific examples if you expect anyone to take you serious.I used to read the calls to action then proposed legislation. There's usually a disconnect between the proposals and their summaries and 'attention grabbing' titles and summaries. How can an 'advocacy' group be taken seriously when they use fear and sensationalism?
I hear the ANTS operate covertly and lurk around every corner...
Of course I see you are still pushing the idea that we are all just addiction driven paranoids. Do you really want to go down that road Steve. A lot of what you are saying is straight out of the anti's playbook. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, it probably is a duck. So far you are attacking essentially all of the legitimate THR advocates, accusing people of being addiction driven paranoids, and telling us flat out lies about the deeming regulation.
I have no idea of what your agenda is but it doesn't look good.