Hcigar HB DNA 40 anticipation thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eric Auer

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 14, 2014
989
1,887
PA
Technonut: Yes, I'm already assuming this will not qualify as an "authorized Evolv reseller" item. Just a blind leap of faith with no safety harness. :ohmy:

Vapenstein: Thanks for the pics. Yes, the small gap due to the slightly raised 510 connection is still there, similar to the HB50 that I've seen in video reviews. I was hoping it would have been removed, but oh well. I can live with it. And yes, for the OCD leaning people, the off-centered 510 connection which will cause the slight overhang for 22mm atomizers is a bummer. I think they had to do that with the new design of the magnetic door. So off-centered with magnet door, or centered and non-magnetic door. I guess their other option would have been to use a different 510 connector. I'm not sure what material this is, but the threads feel really good. It's a slotted, spring-loaded 510. So if their options were this one versus a smaller one that was crappier, I can live with the slight offset, but better 510.

Pic of the 510 connection:


Pic to compare the sizing: iTaste MVP v2 - hcigar HB DNA40 - iStick 50W


For what I got this for (to try out temperature limiting technology), I can live with the offset 510 and any other small flaws, as long as it works correctly. I mean come on, we're talking a real DNA40 fully completed mod for $113 people. My tamper proof sticker was already half hanging off when I received mine. I just pushed it back into place.

I'm not sure if I'm going to have the time to build a coil to test the temperature control yet. So maybe much later tonight.
Sorry for poor pics. Had to use camera phone. Battery dead on my regular camera.

It looks quite a bit wider than the MVP20W....

Eric
 

Vapenstein

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 4, 2010
1,771
999
I just ran the numbers in my ohm's law iPad app. I never realized it, but the iPV Mini was inaccurate. The DNA 40's 24w/3.7v/.57 ohm On my Subtank adds up. My iPV Mini was reading the .57 coil as .1 lower than actual if I go by the wattage/voltage numbers at the 28.5w I used to vape on it. So that is another point for this DNA, I appreciate the fact that it appears to be an accurate device.
 

Vapenstein

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 4, 2010
1,771
999
Sorry about my enthusiasm today. Last post for the day. Sorry for the crappy pic, just wanted to illustrate that the fire button location was actually well chosen. I primarily vape left handed and drive, use the iPad, use a mouse, whatever, with my right hand. This box is very comfortable to use left handed. The fire button is solid and nicely clicky too.
F64C3E1E-61C5-4210-9AD0-32B8DAE97FB4_zpszi3z03qj.jpg
 

Genghis

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 25, 2009
101
169
Abq, NM
As you mentioned, the buttons are really nice and clicky. No rattle for anyone who cares. I don't.

I think my first attempt at a Ni200 build was a failure. 28 gauge, single coil, about 13 wraps on a 9/64 drill bit on an RDA. My ohm reader read it at .16, but it reads .20 on the HB. I kept trying to fiddle with the settings to get an acceptable vape, but could not dial it in. Everything I tried felt underpowered. I cranked it up pretty high and got a little bit more vapor, but tasted a little bit of burnt taste, so I stopped. I popped on a Subtank and it seemed like everything for this kanthal build is working properly.

Please note, that I have no experience with any DNA40 device and almost non-existent experience with an RDA. I'm almost certain that I did something wrong. But I'm too tired now to attempt another build.

Everything on the screen seems to be working correctly (other than my build). It hits the temp limit that I set and then flashes a few times after I let go of the fire button. If I remember correctly 28 gauge Ni200 was suppose to be the ideal gauge to use, but I may have try some other gauges to try and bring up the resistance. Trying to get a coil with more than 13-15 wraps appears to be a bit challenging with the small space we need to fit it in.

I'm going to have to read some Ni200 coil build threads before making another attempt. Hopefully I'll figure it out tomorrow.
 

realbriguy

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 17, 2013
87
75
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
I just came across this thread, and since I've been using this HCigar HB-DNA40 since Tuesday, acquired through Vape Triad, I'll see if I can answer a bunch of questions regarding the device, and specifically with what Vape Triad is doing.



Then I stumbled across the Hcigar HB DNA 40, which is shipping sometime after the conclusion of Chinese New Year, so we'll see it some time in March.

Select retailers already have this in stock as of this past week.

People aren't going to like the 510 connector on this one, but it's a small gripe given all the other benchmarks this little box hits.

What's wrong with the 510 connector?


The fire button is in a kind of goofy spot

It is, but you'll have to try it to understand it. The first time I saw it, I thought the same thing. Then I tried it for the first time in the DNA clone 38W version of this box design, and realized that the fire button placement just made absolute sense. The enclosure used by HCigar for both this Evolv DNA40D version and the DNA clone 38W version is pretty much the exact same.

Holding the device like you would any other, the button placement just lands right where your thumb is, regardless of whether you're using it right or left handed.

I'm starting to like being able to fire with my thumb more than with my index finger now.


It's the nicest plastic Hammond box on the market. And it'll be under $100 soon enough.

It's CNC machined from a billet of 6061 aircraft grade aluminum, then media blasted and anodized. I've seen in many places across the internet, the assumption that it's plastic, and I wonder why. The only plastic on the outside of the enclosure, is the window protecting the DNA screen.

My particular unit, the rough surface and the anodizing process used, does give it a warmer touch than bare metal. Maybe this is why the assumption that it's plastic, but I can assure you, it is aluminum.


Although I'm happy to see that legit DNA 40 mods are reaching a better price point, I hope this one is wired better than the HCigar DNA 30 Mini Vaporshark clone.

Infinitely better. It's all put together using a formed plastic frame to hold the components internally, and then screwed down to posts that have been machined directly to the aluminum enclosure. The only bit of hot glue used, is to secure the board to the internal plastic support frame via the rails.


Could be, the SX300 HB50, which was their last box before this, looks very similar, and is plastic.

Hcigar_E_Cig_box_mod_vv_vw.jpg

This is not plastic either. It's also CNC machined from a billet of 6061 aircraft grade aluminum. Even Matt Culley from Suck My Mod said he thought it was plastic in his video review, but he later corrected himself in the description of the video. If this device honestly felt like plastic to the lot of you, then HCigar must be doing a great job of how this feels.

Think about it: The 510 connector grounds directly to the enclosure as the common ground, as does the DNA board and the battery negative terminal. If the enclosure were plastic, it would not be able to conduct electricity.


I never thought I'd say this but I hope the Evolv chips in that hcigar box work properly. That kind of scares me. At least with most of the others using the DNA 40 you can send it in when the chip goes pear shaped. With this I fear your SOL. Pretty much makes it a no buy for me.

Buy it from a reputable vendor who will support the manufacturer's warranty, and you won't have an issue. The HCigar HB-DNA40 has a manufacturer's 90 day warranty, which Vape Triad says they will fully support and handle directly through them, for the total length of the warranty. They are going through great lengths to support HCigar as a brand.


I wonder what Evolv has to say about these. I may shoot them an email. I assumed Hcigar bought the chips from Evolv since they name them on the packaging.

There's a lot of discussion about this online, and while I've been told the details, I'm not going to say too much in public. For now, all that can be said, is that Evolv did not handle this initial chip sale directly. There are a number of reasons for this, but it was done on purpose. The deal was handled through a third party EU distributor for Evolv (they're legit).


Just caught this in another thread... Doesn't overly concern me.. Have a screwdriver handy just in case though... ;)

retird said:
This was posted in another forum about the Hcigar HB-DNA40....... just passing along FYI:


Just came across a few units of the HB-DNA40 that are showing up with the "Weak Battery" error fairly early on. Units may work fine right out of the box, but when running high drain setups (multi coil, low resistance), it may create arcing at the grounding contact points, which create enough impedance to show the error. The higher the drain of the atomizer, the faster this error seems to occur. More tests need to be done to confirm this for certain, but the half dozen units or so that I've tested so far that bring up this error, it's beginning to show this to be the case.

From what I can tell, the anodization used on the casing is a dielectric, and the grounding screws for the 510 and the battery's negative terminal is screwed in a single time and not tight enough. This may not be enough to break through enough of the anodization in the casing's screw holes to create a proper connection. The small gaps of contact may be small enough to create some resistance, which results in an electrical arc during firing of high drain setups. The arcing results in carbon build up, which creates more resistance, and messes with the DNA40's sensitive readings.

The best preventative solution I've found so far, is to back out the screws and screw them back in a couple of times to break through more of the anodized layer to get better contact to the enclosure. Also, the factory did not screw the grounds in very tight, so it's recommended that they be made a bit tighter to create a better contact. Doing this seems to have solved the problems so far.
14 mins · Like

EDIT: I'm thinking about running the screws in / out a few times, then take them out, apply a thin coating of Noalox, and run them back in tightly.. Should do the trick.. :)

Of course this is not for folks who are concerned about voiding their warranty by removing the anti-tamper sticker..

This fix was later retracted, and was pointed out as no longer a valid fix, as it actually puts your board at risk of being fried.

It's not the fix itself that would cause your board to be fried - it's the overall setup of the wiring that puts a lot of high current drain on the very tiny traces of the board. Tightening the grounding screws will improve the connection to the enclosure as the common ground, but it does not solve the base problem, where all of the grounded connections through the enclosure are coming back into the board through a single point, rather than all of the marked ones.

In a particular scenario where the board is drawing a lot of current through it, the existing wiring setup will be forcing up to 8.9 Amps of power to be flowing through the tiny traces of the DNA40 board. This would result in a fried, and dead board.

Vape Triad is not just correcting the issue by tightening a few screws. They're actually going out of their way to desolder existing connections, and to resolder a new wiring layout to get proper and reliable performance. From initial tests so far, not only has the Weak Battery issue gone away on their most troublesome test unit, but internal resistance has also gone down since the enclosure is no longer used as the common ground. All of the units shipping out of Vape Triad will have these wiring improvements applied.

From what I've been told, this is the same issue that Vapor Flask went through at first, so this isn't a problem that's just limited to China. Vape Triad has been recording all of the changes made, and will be sending them back to HCigar when they are back from holidays, so that all of the changes will be applied to later production runs of this product. Early adopter problems... :p


In that case, it appears that Sweet-Vapes only wants to involve themselves for a 30 day manufacturing defects warranty, going by what's stated in their description... I applaud the vendor who is going to the trouble of securing the screws for their customers, and posted the fix. :toast: Our choice would be to either take a chance that the screws are properly installed, and look for issues within 30 days (chances are a replacement would have the same issue until new, corrected stock arrives), or make the fix ourselves.. As posted, I'll be fixing mine.. ;)

EDIT: If this is the same vendor mentioned, I do not applaud the $147.50 USD price... :unsure:

HCigar HB-DNA40 (Black) Box Mod with Evolv Temperature Control / Protection

The price is certainly higher than those out there, but if they're not only supporting the 90 day warranty, but also going out of their way to re-wire all of the circuitry so that their units are better performing and more reliable than any screw-tightened version out there, I believe there's value in that.


first impressions

the gap created by the 510 adapter doesn't bother me
90B284C0-276B-4C72-880B-F44F86AE1B18_zpsgxtgp9dm.jpg
None of the units that Vape Triad has, has that gap. All of their units (except for 5 silver ones which are discounted in-store) have flush mounted 510 landing pads as well as battery pull ribbons attached to them. They were all done by special request based on feedback that was given on the HB SX series boxes. Later production runs of all of the HB-DNA40's should all have these features.


one more gripe. The smoked plastic over the display doesn't improve legibility. Bad choice but again, not a dealbreaker. It would make it tough to read in sunlight IMO.

I totally agree with you there. Mine is a little bit blurry/hazy, and I've had a hard time reading it in the sunlight. I hope it gets fixed.
 
Last edited:

AnsonJames

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 23, 2011
1,855
2,239
IRELAND
Here's another very, very quick look at the Hcigar DNA 40. Skip to the 1:17:00 point (that's one hour, 17 minutes -- it's a movie-length video). The actual Hcigar look only takes up about a minute, but you can see the internals a bit.



I met the guy doing most of the talking in this video at a Vapefest in Ireland, his name is Dave Dorn.
He vapes 40mg eliquid - which I tried.

Almost took my head off.
 

Technonut

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 11, 2010
5,090
7,290
62
East Coast, USA
I just came across this thread, and since I've been using this HCigar HB-DNA40 since Tuesday, acquired through Vape Triad, I'll see if I can answer a bunch of questions regarding the device, and specifically with what Vape Triad is doing.





Select retailers already have this in stock as of this past week.



What's wrong with the 510 connector?




It is, but you'll have to try it to understand it. The first time I saw it, I thought the same thing. Then I tried it for the first time in the DNA clone 38W version of this box design, and realized that the fire button placement just made absolute sense. The enclosure used by HCigar for both this Evolv DNA40D version and the DNA clone 38W version is pretty much the exact same.

Holding the device like you would any other, the button placement just lands right where your thumb is, regardless of whether you're using it right or left handed.

I'm starting to like being able to fire with my thumb more than with my index finger now.




It's CNC machined from a billet of 6061 aircraft grade aluminum, then media blasted and anodized. I've seen in many places across the internet, the assumption that it's plastic, and I wonder why. The only plastic on the outside of the enclosure, is the window protecting the DNA screen.

My particular unit, the rough surface and the anodizing process used, does give it a warmer touch than bare metal. Maybe this is why the assumption that it's plastic, but I can assure you, it is aluminum.




Infinitely better. It's all put together using a formed plastic frame to hold the components internally, and then screwed down to posts that have been machined directly to the aluminum enclosure. The only bit of hot glue used, is to secure the board to the internal plastic support frame via the rails.




This is not plastic either. It's also CNC machined from a billet of 6061 aircraft grade aluminum. Even Matt Culley from Suck My Mod said he thought it was plastic in his video review, but he later corrected himself in the description of the video. If this device honestly felt like plastic to the lot of you, then HCigar must be doing a great job of how this feels.

Think about it: The 510 connector grounds directly to the enclosure as the common ground, as does the DNA board and the battery negative terminal. If the enclosure were plastic, it would not be able to conduct electricity.




Buy it from a reputable vendor who will support the manufacturer's warranty, and you won't have an issue. The HCigar HB-DNA40 has a manufacturer's 90 day warranty, which Vape Triad says they will fully support and handle directly through them, for the total length of the warranty. They are going through great lengths to support HCigar as a brand.




There's a lot of discussion about this online, and while I've been told the details, I'm not going to say too much in public. For now, all that can be said, is that Evolv did not handle this initial chip sale directly. There are a number of reasons for this, but it was done on purpose. The deal was handled through a third party EU distributor for Evolv (they're legit).




This fix was later retracted, and was pointed out as no longer a valid fix, as it actually puts your board at risk of being fried.

It's not the fix itself that would cause your board to be fried - it's the overall setup of the wiring that puts a lot of high current drain on the very tiny traces of the board. Tightening the grounding screws will improve the connection to the enclosure as the common ground, but it does not solve the base problem, where all of the grounded connections through the enclosure are coming back into the board through a single point, rather than all of the marked ones.

In a particular scenario where the board is drawing a lot of current through it, the existing wiring setup will be forcing up to 8.9 Amps of power to be flowing through the tiny traces of the DNA40 board. This would result in a fried, and dead board.

Vape Triad is not just correcting the issue by tightening a few screws. They're actually going out of their way to desolder existing connections, and to resolder a new wiring layout to get proper and reliable performance. From initial tests so far, not only has the Weak Battery issue gone away on their most troublesome test unit, but internal resistance has also gone down since the enclosure is no longer used as the common ground. All of the units shipping out of Vape Triad will have these wiring improvements applied.

From what I've been told, this is the same issue that Vapor Flask went through at first, so this isn't a problem that's just limited to China. Vape Triad has been recording all of the changes made, and will be sending them back to HCigar when they are back from holidays, so that all of the changes will be applied to later production runs of this product. Early adopter problems... :p





The price is certainly higher than those out there, but if they're not only supporting the 90 day warranty, but also going out of their way to re-wire all of the circuitry so that their units are better performing and more reliable than any screw-tightened version out there, I believe there's value in that.



None of the units that Vape Triad has, has that gap. All of their units (except for 5 silver ones which are discounted in-store) have flush mounted 510 landing pads as well as battery pull ribbons attached to them. They were all done by special request based on feedback that was given on the HB SX series boxes. Later production runs of all of the HB-DNA40's should all have these features.




I totally agree with you there. Mine is a little bit blurry/hazy, and I've had a hard time reading it in the sunlight. I hope it gets fixed.

Thanks for the updated info.. Certainly doesn't leave us who purchased through Sweet-Vapes in a good position.. The DNA 40 spec sheet states a typical input current of 8.0 amps, and a maximum of 16.0 amps.. Doesn't seem that the 8.9 amps you spoke of as potentially frying the board would apply.. Perhaps I'm missing something..

I'm going ahead with removing the screws, applying a thin layer of Noalox, and snugging them down as a preventative measure.. I more than likely won't exceed 30-35 watts with the device anyhow, and only purchased it to compare the temp-protection to the SXminiJ M that I should be receiving by the end of next month.. Others may want to rethink their purchase until these issues are corrected, if indeed valid (again, going by Evolv's DNA 40 spec sheet)...
 

MidwestGuy

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 17, 2014
365
841
Iowa
So the fix is to remove the "enclosure as ground" issue? How is this solved, exactly? Assuming it has something to do with soldering a wire to the side (negative/ground portion) of the 510 and wiring that directly to the GND point on the board... Removing any existing ground wires of course. I don't have mine yet so haven't been able to check out the wiring.
 

Technonut

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 11, 2010
5,090
7,290
62
East Coast, USA
So the fix is to remove the "enclosure as ground" issue? How is this solved, exactly? Assuming it has something to do with soldering a wire to the side (negative/ground portion) of the 510 and wiring that directly to the GND point on the board... Removing any existing ground wires of course. I don't have mine yet so haven't been able to check out the wiring.

How would that make a difference, since the 510 connector is installed in, and grounded by the enclosure? I'm starting to smell something fishy.. I just can't see a vendor making these fixes which involve desoldering, and rewiring multiple devices. It would make more sense to merely ship the devices back, and wait for the corrected versions to be shipped back (in sealed factory packaging). I also find it hard to believe that Hcigar would allow a vendor to perform these "repairs"... Sounding kind of dubious to me.. :confused:



EDIT: There is also no mention of these "repairs" in the vendor's listing.... Again, strange..

http://www.vapetriad.com/hcigar-box-hb-dna40-black-with-evolv-temperature-control-protection/
 
Last edited:

Vapenstein

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 4, 2010
1,771
999
day two update

no unexpected behavior
battery level indicator appears functional

re. the accuracy thing, as much as I liked my iPV Mini, and it vapes great, I think the SX130 chip is way off. I vaped 28.5w on a .5 ohm build day in and day out on that thing, never a dry hit. Showed delivering 3.7v. On the DNA 40 it shows 4.1v delivered at .57 ohms/28.5w, and it's right on the edge of dry hitting, certainly burnt, hot and not optimal. I think this is a Subtank Mini thing, it can only feed to a certain power level before it can't wick fast enough with the smallish juice inlets on the rba section. On the DNA 40 I have it dialed back to 22w, 3.61v shown being delivered, and the vape is approximately the same as the vape I got off this tank at 28.5w on the iPV Mini in terms of flavor, vapor and wicking. So the accuracy of the DNA 40 appears to be giving me more headroom than I had with the iPV Mini, which will be nice for RDAs and Kanthal tank builds lower than .5 ohm.

tl;dr I am still really happy about this box.

Looking forward to getting the hang of nickel and temp protection this week when my ni200 show up in the mail.
 

realbriguy

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 17, 2013
87
75
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Thanks for the updated info.. Certainly doesn't leave us who purchased through Sweet-Vapes in a good position.. The DNA 40 spec sheet states a typical input current of 8.0 amps, and a maximum of 16.0 amps.. Doesn't seem that the 8.9 amps you spoke of as potentially frying the board would apply.. Perhaps I'm missing something..
I don't know the details on why 8.9 Amps. This is what Canada's largest Evolv distributor had told Vape Triad when they talked about the issue. Maybe I misunderstood that somehow, and it was meant to say that the trace could only handle up to 8.9 Amps on its own, which starts to make more sense, as the grounding load is meant to be split across two different traces on opposite ends of the board. As the HCigar HBDNA40 is currently designed, both of the grounds are going through just one trace.

I'm going ahead with removing the screws, applying a thin layer of Noalox, and snugging them down as a preventative measure.. I more than likely won't exceed 30-35 watts with the device anyhow, and only purchased it to compare the temp-protection to the SXminiJ M that I should be receiving by the end of next month.. Others may want to rethink their purchase until these issues are corrected, if indeed valid (again, going by Evolv's DNA 40 spec sheet)...
The resistance of your atomizer can also make a difference - it's not just about power output. One customer at Vape Triad was getting this problem with a brand new unit right out of the box with a simple 0.8 Ohm Kanthal dual coil build set to 30W. Couldn't get it to fire even once.

So the fix is to remove the "enclosure as ground" issue? How is this solved, exactly? Assuming it has something to do with soldering a wire to the side (negative/ground portion) of the 510 and wiring that directly to the GND point on the board... Removing any existing ground wires of course. I don't have mine yet so haven't been able to check out the wiring.
Currently, the setup is like this:

- DNA40 ground out goes to the top enclosure screw via the "OUT" negative pin on the DNA40 board (it's meant for the 510 negative).
- 510 negative grounds to enclosure by its attachment method, thus, closing the circuit to the "OUT" negative pin. This turns the enclosure into a bridge for that circuit.
- Battery negative grounds to the enclosure at the bottom of the two screw terminals that was previously recommended to be tightened.

Thus, the 510 and battery ground to the enclosure in a loop, which connects to the board via one pin.

The current fix that Vape Triad is doing, is removing the battery negative terminal wire altogether, and soldering a new (longer) one, tagged directly to the battery negative pin located on the board. By doing so, the enclosure is removed from that part of the circuit, and it isolates that ground from the enclosure.For whatever reason, HCigar decided not to use this pin at all. Perhaps it was easier/cheaper/faster to do it the way they did it, not realizing the sensitivity of the DNA40 chip required absolutely perfect connections. Regardless of the reason, this fix is working. They've had a couple of troublesome units, that even screw tightening did not work. Re-soldering the wiring to new connections was the only solution, and they received guidance from the Canadian Evolv distributor.

They did also mention the possibility of looking into doing a direct ground wire between the 510 negative housing to the DNA40 board to completely remove the enclosure from the circuit, but so far, the battery negative relocation seems to be holding up fine on its own. The 510 negative fix may not be required. Vape Triad is looking into it.


How would that make a difference, since the 510 connector is installed in, and grounded by the enclosure? I'm starting to smell something fishy.. I just can't see a vendor making these fixes which involve desoldering, and rewiring multiple devices. It would make more sense to merely ship the devices back, and wait for the corrected versions to be shipped back (in sealed factory packaging). I also find it hard to believe that Hcigar would allow a vendor to perform these "repairs"... Sounding kind of dubious to me.. :confused:

Again, this fix has nothing to do with the 510 connector. As mentioned above, the current fix is done by tagging the battery negative terminal directly to the board - and so far, it's worked and fixed their most problematic units.

I suppose Vape Triad could just send the units back to China to be fixed, but that's as long as customers are okay with waiting for the product to come back... end of March? Early April? This fix works now, and I have it in my hands now, so what's the issue? You're right, it would be make more sense in terms of time and convenience to ship the devices back and WAIT for the corrected versions to be shipped back, but Vape Triad is setting themselves apart as first-to-market with an effective and reliable product at their price point.

As for HCigar allowing them to do that... Vape Triad has a lot of pull with HCigar. It's why they were able to get changes applied to their units that other vendors don't have.

EDIT: There is also no mention of these "repairs" in the vendor's listing.... Again, strange..

HCigar HB-DNA40 (Black) Box Mod with Evolv Temperature Control / Protection

Actually, they do mention it in the second paragraph of that link:

VapeTriad.com said:
All HCigar HB-DNA40's purchased from Vape Triad will be opened and quality control checked prior to sale, with additional modifications applied to the internal circuitry to mitigate any potential problems. The current design can potentially cause a "Weak Battery" error with a fully charged battery, but these issues will be corrected in-house by Vape Triad to ensure trouble-free operation by our customers. Be aware that this process may cause the warranty seal to be affected, but Vape Triad will still take care of the warranty issues for you, should you run into any problems.
 
Last edited:

realbriguy

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 17, 2013
87
75
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
It would be great for business being the only one who has "corrected" devices currently available at a higher price than elsewhere for those wanting a "good" one though huh? ;)

It would justify paying more, if it meant not having to deal with the problem as a customer, along with full 90 day warranty support through them as well.

Just saw this video of the Weak Battery error popping up on YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMRSHDEtmOY

I suppose a thriftier customer who had the knowledge and equipment to fix the weak battery error on their own could go with the cheaper route.
 
Last edited:

realbriguy

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 17, 2013
87
75
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Vape Triad says they'll be posting photos of the internals of their fixed units in a day or two, after they're done testing and before they go into production on their remaining units. They've applied the battery negative re-location to four units as of yesterday, and say all were successful, but wanted to stress test those units it for a couple of days first before committing to production.
 

Technonut

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 11, 2010
5,090
7,290
62
East Coast, USA
Until I see reports of the issue here on ECF from owner's of the device, I remain suspicious... If your 2nd hand info is correct, thanks for posting it. :) I know that Mark Todd is going to be reviewing one.. At the time of his Vlog, he was impressed. We'll see how his review turns out.. ;)

Could be that the Sweet-Vapes units are good.. We won't know until member reports start coming in...
 

realbriguy

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 17, 2013
87
75
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Until I see reports of the issue here on ECF from owner's of the device, I remain suspicious... If your 2nd hand info is correct, thanks for posting it. :) I know that Mark Todd is going to be reviewing one.. At the time of his Vlog, he was impressed. We'll see how his review turns out.. ;)

Check out the Youtube video I'd posted. I'd edited that post to add it in, but don't know if you saw it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread