Not speaking to me, but I thought I would add -- As have I!the most funniest thing is i have got so many PM's from many members of this board saying thanks for debating in this thread and are behind me...
Yay us! W00t!
Not speaking to me, but I thought I would add -- As have I!the most funniest thing is i have got so many PM's from many members of this board saying thanks for debating in this thread and are behind me...
For the first time here, I exercised this. Allow me to assist with navigation.can't find the ignore fast enough
Clinton told Esquire magazine that lawmakers should put together the best health care measure for President Barack Obama, even if it must be fixed later.
this is why i hate democrats why are they rushing this...
Nice repetition of an empty talking point. America has been working on health care reform for over two generations. The "rushing" line is pure anti-reform propaganda. Way to stay true to form, denec.
it is not propaganda
Yes it is.
to you it is...all i know is only 17% in this country is uninsured..to me that is not a crisis..and i bet most of them are not working, illegals, bottom feeders or what not, i wonder how many of those have big tv's, computers, take drugs, and other things they do not need when they can buy their own insurance if they really want.
i say to hell with them..it is not my job to pay for them...and that is what will happen
as i say time and time again...healthcare is not a right in this country according to the constitution
"We hold this truth to be self-evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among this are life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. To secure this right goverments are instituted among men, deriving their just power form the constant of the governed;"
Casey, thanks for your update to my 1st grader explanation of socialism/fascism yesterday. I dummed it down too much, and your note was MUCH better.
Now i would think you Life would be some how affected by healthcare...for a nation to withhold health care from its citizens not only will affect the Quality of that life, but the Quantity of life that person holds
we don't withhold life from our citizens..if it is an emergency we have plenty of ER's across our nation
and there are plenty of hospitals that treat people who have no insurance for free if you have some sort of illness like cancer but you will not get the best of care...but why should you?
as i say time and time again...healthcare is not a right in this country according to the constitution
That's a meaningless statement. The emergency room is not the appropriate place for most medical needs. It's for emergencies, not for things like on going therapy, detailed diagnostics and preventive care. Furthermore, emergency rooms are the most costly avenue to health care available. Going there is not a casual activity like going to your GP. The costs of emergency room visits can and do cause people to become ruined financially, something that wouldn't have to happen if more people had good coverage.
There are not "plenty of hospitals that treat people who have no insurance for free" and even if there were, do you think it's a good idea to force people to consider which hospital to go to when they've had an accident and need emergency care? "Can you take me to the hospital that's 10 miles away? I can't afford to go to the one that's right here."
Hospitals and emergency rooms are not a viable solution for life long health care.
that is your problem not mine...10 miles is nothing
and all hospitals are required to treat someone in an emergency..
Neither is digital copyright. Do you advocate pirating music and movies too? There's nothing in the constitution that protects them, so if you intend to be consistent you should support piracy of digital media.
Yeah, that's what people should tell ambulance drivers.
"Hey, 10 miles is nothing! I'm sure I'll live long enough to make it there. My life is less important than my pocketbook."
Way to miss the point.
how many times i have to state it..in an emergency you go to the nearest ER or nearest trauma center no matter if you have insurance or not..
State it as many times as you like. I haven't denied that point. Go re-read my post, because you've either missed or chosen to ignore my point.
EDIT:
Here's the post again.
"That's a meaningless statement. The emergency room is not the appropriate place for most medical needs. It's for emergencies, not for things like on going therapy, detailed diagnostics and preventive care. Furthermore, emergency rooms are the most costly avenue to health care available. Going there is not a casual activity like going to your GP. The costs of emergency room visits can and do cause people to become ruined financially, something that wouldn't have to happen if more people had good coverage."